Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

"Grace is Gone" and The Perils of Film Reviewing

by Anthony Kaufman
January 27, 2007 3:04 AM
1 Comment
  • |

I didn't like "Grace is Gone," James C. Strouse's Iraq homefront melodrama that was acquired at Sundance by The Weinstein Co. One of my chief complaints about the movie was the way it looked. The cinematography felt flat, and in my indieWIRE review, I incorrectly stated that the movie was shot in HD-DV. Well, "Grace is Gone" director of photography Jean-Louis Bompoint (who also shot Michel Gondry's "The Science of Sleep") wrote me an email with a correction: The film was actually shot in Super 35mm, with Fuji Eterna 64D – 250D – 500T film stock. He even sent along stills of the film to show how much better it'd look on celluloid as opposed to the digital projection.

girls profile bed02.JPG

This doesn't make me like the movie anymore, of course, but it does show how dangerous it can be to premiere a film at a festival under less than pristine conditions, and to unveil it to people like me who are ready to criticize it. I feel bad for Mr. Bompoint, and I certainly don't want to damage his reputation, as he writes, "I sincerely think my film career was injured with your latest lines about my work."

The fact is the film's look probably has more to do with Strouse than Bompoint. Perhaps I should have really said it was the direction that was flat, not the cinematography. Or perhaps Bompoint's style was not suited to "Grace is Gone." "The Science of Sleep"'s strange, unreal quality makes perfect sense. But in "Grace is Gone," the big pink walls and uninspired camera placements don't do much to help the emotional truth of the story.

  • |
Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

1 Comment

  • philippa | February 1, 2007 6:59 AMReply

    I read this as a kind of correction of the article by the author - of what he was saying, that the film was shot on Super 35 but shown in the wrong or not optimal conditions. I don't think that it could possibly "injure" the DP's career. I don't think Anthony even named him in the review and I don't think that he's tearing up the film's cinematography at all. I think that it's much more important to read the true impressions of a critic at the exactly the time the film is screened. Blogs provide an interesting afterthought space.

Follow ReelPolitik

Latest Tweets

Follow us

Most "Liked"