I think it's instructive that YouTube, launched a year later than "Tarnation," would engender millions of far less talented Caouettes, who would similarly use their computers to document and distribute the stories of their lives, irrevocably changing the media world. But why didn't "Tarnation" itself break out in a bigger way and become a more influential phenomenon. While the movie earned more than a million dollars in box office receipts worldwide—a not-too-shabby figure for a weird personal doc—"Tarnation" still seems to be regarded today as a kind of outsider-art oddball.
One of my contentions is that Caouette's films, both "Tarnation" and "Walk Away Renee" are in many ways difficult to watch, showing rather unpleasant sides of the director and his mother. "Indeed, the films can be off-putting," I suggest, "which may be one of the reasons why few filmmakers have followed in Caouette's brash footsteps. For all of its digital razzle-dazzle, the work is ultimately about mental combustion and collapse, which in turn drives his unique aesthetic choices. How many filmmakers can claim to be so closely in tune with mental illness to cinematically reproduce it?"
RT @ReelChanger: Oh, man, I absolutely love this comparison of Gatsby and Spring Breakers by @antkaufman. http://t.co/NiKnsX7oj4Posted 32 minutes ago
@antkaufman I admire his work even appreciate its sensationalism but consistently his films are too long and that decreases their impact.Posted 8 hours ago
What is the key ingredient to Alex Gibney’s success? My latest Docutopia column: "Serious Sensationalism" http://t.co/tRg4D0qVdzPosted 8 hours ago
Serious Sensationalism—The Alex Gibney Doc Factory | Docutopia http://t.co/zIJoCZtbdkPosted 9 hours ago