In this week's Docutopia column at the SundanceNow website, I ask, "In Depicting Trauma, Does Narrative Cinema Fall Short"?
Here is an excerpt:
When tragedies of this magnitude take place, is a sterile “art project”—as Salon.com critic Charles Taylor derisively called the film—the most effective way to represent them?
Taylor also suggested in his review that Van Sant “substitutes aesthetics for exploration,” which I think goes too far. The problem isn’t that Van Sant replaces aesthetics for deeper exploration; it’s that the film foregrounds its cinematic technique to explore these horrors in a highly dispassionate way. So when it comes to massive catastrophe and heartbreak—i.e. an event involving the slaughter of innocent children—can narrative illusionism really capture or retell those events with the same sense of responsibility—or force—as a more sober documentary? Yet perhaps the problem with Elephant hinges less on its status as fiction than on the kind of fiction it is: one that removes itself from the horror via a kind of stylized splendor. Recall similar critiques leveled at Steven Spielberg’s Schindler’s List many years ago: Should a movie about the Holocaust look so beautiful?
RT @thompowers: Rithy Panh documentary A MISSING PICTURE wins Un Certain Regard at #Cannes2013 http://t.co/bQr9TZh1lO @antkaufman
Posted 6 hours ago
Rithy Panh documentary A MISSING PICTURE wins Un Certain Regard at #Cannes2013 http://t.co/bQr9TZh1lO @antkaufman
Posted 8 hours ago
Rare for Cannes, a documentary wins top honors in Un Certain Regard #Cannes2013 | ReelPolitik http://t.co/jRstv4MqiN
Posted 10 hours ago
Political Pics on Khmer Rouge and Palestinian Occupation Win Cannes Prizes | ReelPolitik http://t.co/IxicbSMvGB
Posted 12 hours ago
1 Comment
han | December 20, 2012 9:23 AM
try denis villeneuve's polytechnique instead.