What happens when the alternative paper of record's shortlist of the best things to do loses its critical focus? What happens when instead of highlighting Patrice Chereau's new film "Gabrielle" or a Michael Haneke retro at the Anthology Film Archives, the Village Voice instead shouts out a roofside screening of "Waiting for Guffman" or a Chicks With Flicks Film Fest.
When the new owners of the Village Voice instituted a revamp of the Voice Choices section -- a short list often accompanied by arthouse picks selected by J. Hoberman -- and replaced it with more populist recommendations of outdoor screenings and the like chosen by the listings editor, will the type of foreign and avant-garde films that the Voice has championed for the last 50 years suffer? Does anyone care? Voice readers will also notice that the Film section has been pushed to the back of the paper, where it used to the first thing readers would turn to in the arts coverage.
Is it possible that new owner Michael Lacey just simply hates movies?
Self-censorship, Iranian cinema and Asghar Farhadi's "The Past" | ReelPolitik http://t.co/8at5HbbYCKPosted 17 hours ago
The 1CCU PR Press Daily is out! http://t.co/EpEqPeEGi9 ▸ Top stories today via @E_TV_PR @antkaufmanPosted 19 hours ago
Why did PBS allow Koch "to offer a critique of a film he hadn’t even seen? Money." - Alex Gibney http://t.co/OuwQKo3KTFPosted 19 hours ago
"Since you're white it's not an issue for you" -- Debating the Class/Racial Politics of "Frances Ha" -- see comments http://t.co/U1D1Had0XyPosted 20 hours ago