Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

So Luke Grimes Left 'True Blood' Because He Refused To Play Gay

News
by Jeremy Staley
June 26, 2014 10:21 AM
19 Comments
  • |


Buzzfeed has some depressing gossip for y'all: Remember when Luke Grimes suddenly left "True Blood" last year? It's been confirmed it was because he wasn't cool with his character James's upcoming gay romance with Lafayette. That actually kind of goes in line with HBO's vague initial statement -- which was that his decision was attributed to “the creative direction of the character.” His publicist begs to differ, saying it was "scheduling." But that's what publicists have to say. Buzzfeed, on the other hand, had a different story:

According to the source close to True Blood, writers and cast members were baffled and angered by Grimes’ reluctance to take James in a same-sex direction, especially since True Blood has always been an overtly sexual show with heavy LGBT undertones. Despite the scramble to recast the part, the writers and cast are pleased with Parsons’ performance, and believe he’s a good fit for the role of James.

Parsons is Nathan Parsons (from the dearly departed "Bunheads"!), who replaced Grimes as James, and we agree is doing just fine. As for Grimes -- Here's hoping "True Blood" was the highlight of his career.

News
get email updates
  • |

19 Comments

  • Garry1 | July 25, 2014 12:40 AMReply

    really sad that someone can be straight bashed for the way they were born. :( I still remember the first time a homosexual man hit on me. i was nice but i felt sick in my stomach and not in a good way. sad that those of us that are born heterosexual with our own feelings that we cant help have to hide our feelings or face slanderous labeling as homophobic or racist instead of just being friends. i almost wish i was not a human being at this point because it doesnt matter what you are apparently. the other side treats you the same way every bad person has ever reacted almost blindly to themselves. everyone just grab a stone already and ding each other in the head so we can get an AA meeting and then go back to work.

  • Leonbravioso | June 30, 2014 9:29 PMReply

    I thought the LGBTQ community was about acceptance?
    Why is this young actor being knocked for making a decision that is about him and his sexual preference?
    I'd have respect for any gay actor that said I'd prefer to play strong proud gay men roles. Granted he'd read for much fewer roles but I'd still respect him.
    I could be wrong but no where did Luke Grimes say he had anything against homosexuality. He just prefers NOT to kiss a man or have simulated sex with him. Just because I believe that homosexuals are no different than heterosexuals and are 100% equal does NOT mean I believe people should be forced to play gay just like I don't think gay men and women should not be forced to play straight.
    He didn't show homophobia, just preference.

  • Leonbravioso | June 30, 2014 9:33 PM

    Sorry, I meant that I don't think straight people should be forced to play gay and gay men and women should not be forced to play straight.

    I hit submit too soon and there is no way to edit the post afterwards.

  • Emile Rentrof | June 29, 2014 12:43 PMReply

    Well, of course HE'D be cast in 50 shades of gray.

    Homophobic actor cast in the homophobic writer's '50 Shades of Gray'.

    Luke Grimes passed the litmus test to be cast in Shades of Gray.

    He and E.L. James can cuddle while they throw shit at the gay people helping them make their careers.

  • Emile Rentrof | June 29, 2014 12:34 PMReply

    Luke Grimes - homophobic actor. Another a-hole actor. Move over Crowe and Gibson, you have company......from a lesser known but just as hateful.

  • Ant | June 28, 2014 2:07 AMReply

    Maybee he likes to have control over his choices. maybee he would happily sign onto Brokeback Mountain 2 but draws a line at the character shark jumping that has straight characters waking up and suddenly craving something new.
    Actors can sign on for 7 years but it can't be I'll suck on any thing I'm told for 7!years.
    When you sign on for a role it's ok to expect the parameters of the character to be discussed. Sign on for gay, get ready to grind sign up for nice then we won't turn you into a serial killer. Are we now at a point when any girl can be asked to go full nude and any guy to be asked to perform gay sex or asked to rape a women and suddenly every actor has to be agreeable. I don't think his behavior is homophobic. It's about control. He got to make a choice he was told he didn't have.

  • deltrice smith | July 2, 2014 12:56 AM

    What you said is definitely true. but theres a lot of reasons for why he (or his agent) would have felt uncomfortable with him doing gay scenes. For one, he is very new to acting...this is when teenage girls are developing their crushes for you and the public is forming their opinions about you and your craft. Since this is his first big appearance in Hollywood, maybe his agent didn't want him to be remembered as "that bisexual vampire from True Blood".

    Beginning a career in acting is tricky, and the roles/scenes that you play in the beginning can shape the way that casting directors look at you for the rest of your career. If this weren't the final season of true blood, and he knew his contract would be extended for another 5 or so years, that would be a different story. I'm sure he/his agent felt that "going gay" this early in his career wouldn't be worth the risk considering it's just a minor role in the final season of an hbo show. Taking on gay roles later in an actor's career is different, because the public has already formed their opinion of you and the teenage girls have already developed their crushes. A lot of talent agents/managers feel that doing gay roles too early is career suicide because it may jeopardize your chances of being taken seriously as a leading man in future projects (sad but true).

    Of course, actors should have some say in the the dialog and mannerisms of their characters, however attempting to dictate your characters storyline when you are a rookie actor on the final season of a hit show is a very easy way to get fired.

  • Marvin | June 27, 2014 5:20 PMReply

    Good for Luke Grimes. I am sick of having gay trysts thrown in my face at every TV program. Many times, like in House of Cards, the scenes are gratuitous at best and sooo out of storyline at worse. He should have the right to refuse doing a gay scene without being penalized. Damn that director for imposing his beliefs on someone else. sheesh.

  • Emile Rentrof | June 29, 2014 12:36 PM

    Marvin, you sexist homophobe. Go f**k yourself, you hateful piece of straight shit.

  • anonymous | June 27, 2014 12:29 AMReply

    It is sad that you wish that is the high-light of Luke Grimes career. Luke Grimes has a right to refuse to stick his tongue down another man's mouth. He has the right, whether actor or not to grind up against another man, grab another man's booty and fill out the man's junk. I know we claim all of this is acting but when people kiss on a show whether heterosexual or homosexual,,, don't they exchange saliva, don't they basically lick each others mouth...so we call it acting but these actors are actually DOING . Are the rights of a straight man less than one of a gay man? just because it is now legal to be gay does it mean the 100s of years that it was illegal has just left our minds and like puppets everyone would suddenly be okay with it. Be careful not to be too hopped up on this new politically correct 'if you are uncomfortable with homosexuality you are wrong' because the straight will take up a banner soon, start protests etc like homosexuals did too, for their own 'fundamental freedoms' and if they garner enough support ...what happens?... don't get me wrong, i do not fight the homosexuals i just do-not support the new notion that if you are uncomfortable with homosexuality you are the deveil

  • emile rentrof | June 29, 2014 12:44 PM

    Anonymous? Your statement is homophobic and your "anonymous" tag is like wearing a KKK robe and mask.

    Cowardly hater.

  • Big Al | June 27, 2014 10:41 AM

    Yeah talk about man on man action again. I'm so hard right now.

  • silas | June 26, 2014 5:45 PMReply

    WOW how tolerant and so not petulant of you. Please flip these roles and imagine the outcry at your statement then.

  • san | June 26, 2014 2:58 PMReply

    it's call acting, film makes are less likely to want to hire someone who is going to quit a show in the middle just because they are uncomfortable with certain role.

  • colin | June 26, 2014 12:38 PMReply

    Luke Grimes is in final negotiations to co-star with Bradley Cooper in Warner Bros.' “American Sniper.

  • Colin | June 26, 2014 12:36 PMReply

    Just keep up the hate mongering when somebody has a different point of view like a good lil' apparatchik. Maybe someday you'll be accepted by somebody

  • Nope | June 26, 2014 5:21 PM

    So what Colin is saying is that you should leave racists and the KKK alone because they have different points of view and that is normal. Why do you think its ok for the KKK to exist, Colin?

  • Ophelia | June 26, 2014 12:28 PMReply

    It sounds more like he was uncomfortable doing intense sex scenes. I think you painted this article with the bias brush.

  • jlv | June 26, 2014 12:09 PMReply

    So because he didn't want to play a gay part as an actor he MUST be homophobic, so therefore screw him and his career? Wow.

Email Updates