Risk-Taking James Franco In Risk-Free 'Oz the Great and Powerful'

Reviews
by Caryn James
March 6, 2013 10:00 AM
1 Comment
  • |

Flying moneys, good. Flying baboons, bad. That's one difference between the classic, 1939 'Wizard of Oz' and 'Oz the Great and Powerful,' Disney's pricey new extravaganza with James Franco as the pre-wizard carnival con man. More important: don’t go on comparing them. The new 'Oz' is loaded with references, some direct and some tongue-in cheek, but mostly it is a sweeping, kinetic adventure all its own.

Director Sam Raimi has said the old 'Wizard'  is his favorite film, but that doesn't show here. This 'Oz' is no more or less than a commercial enterprise, a movie that no one seems to have put much heart into. But it has appealing characters and terrific actors, and is definitely more fun than most attempts to piggyback on classics.

I may have been an easy target, of course. My favorite line from the classic is "And your little dog, too!" -- which is to say, I have no reverence or affection for the old movie and Judy Garland's pouty performance. And I do usually think James Franco is amazing, even and especially when he's taking an ambitious risk. Laugh at him for doing 'General Hospital' as performance art if you like, but don’t miss him as Allen Ginsberg in the underrated Howl. And I still say his disastrous Oscar gig with Anne Hathaway was not his fault; it was the writers'. (You can watch his recent interview with Stephen Colbert here; Colbert asks, "Are you a fraud?")

No one would call this 'Oz' risky. As homage, it begins in black-and-white at the carnival, where Oz (real name, Oscar) is a hokey magician. His friends from this "real" world will return in different guises, in this case when his hot-air balloon drifts into a tornado and lands him in full-color Oz, a place whose name he shares. Fate? Coincidence? The film doesn’t take on anything that complex. There, the Kansas woman he has loved, but been too ambitious to settle down with reappears as Glinda, both played by Michelle Williams. His best friend from home is played by Zach Braff, who becomes the voice of Oz's loyal sidekick, Finley the flying monkey.

Franco's Oz is appealingly down-to-earth, even when he's being tricky and avaricious. The film might have been much more arch with Robert Downey Jr., who almost starred, or more fantastical with Johnny Depp, who turned it down. With Franco keeping it rooted, the rivalry between witches provides the drama. Mila Kunis and Rachel Weisz are sisters, Theodora and Evanora, full of glamor and secrets, battling with Glinda for control of Emerald City and the affection of the would-be Wizard. Weisz is especially good at walking the line between Disney cartoon come to life  -- her glittery green dress and the green emerald around her neck are classic Disney -- and a treacherous new character. Williams plays Glinda without the saccharine, thank goodness. One of the three will become the pointy-nosed, green-faced, cackling Wicked Witch we know so well.

The screenplay, by Mitchell Kapner and David Lindsay- Abaire (writer of the wrenching, very different 'Rabbit Hole') is merely functional as it glances off and updates the story. There are ethnically diverse people in Oz now, including Munchkins; there are large-scale battles, including one in which Evanora dispatches those flying baboons. There are brief attempts at camp, with some nudging lines at the start (Frank interrupts Oz sweet-talking a woman, and Oz says, "There’s a sock on the door!") that belong to a different film. But the battle between good and evil  -- both within the hero's character and in the land of Oz  -- is fairly foolproof.

Surprisingly, the 3-D, which should have been wondrous, is quite ordinary. The distant views of CGI'd castles look fairly shabby  -- in a Disney movie of all things. Castles R Them. (I do like the green lightning bolts that flow from Evanora’s hands as she tases Glinda, though.)

Whatever my problems with the old 'Wizard of Oz,' it has retained a touch of magic, a remnant of the astonishment that must have struck moviegoers the first time black-and-white Kansas gave way to the yellow brick road and the Emerald City. It's hard to recreate that sense of wonder, and this film doesn’t come close. Why expect it to? 'Oz The Great and Powerful' is a pleasant, colorful fantasy for the moment ( or more accurately, 2 hours and 7 minutes) .








You might also like:
Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

1 Comment

  • Oztastic | March 6, 2013 1:03 PMReply

    This ridiculous notion that either Robert Downey Jr. or Johnny Depp might have made a better Oz than Franco is again ridiculous.

    NO one knows, and I mean NO ONE, if they might have been better or much much worse.

    Seriously, in my opinion Franco did enough and was PERFECT.

    Also, is this the route, that all critics are going in terms of naming previous cast members, who could have gotten a role, or is it something to do with Franco.

    Because, whilst some critics have been going on and on about Downey Jr. that or Depp this, they FAIL to mention that all three witches in this MOVIE, could have been played by other stars, TIME and TIME again.

    Also, the much loved classic Wizard of Oz, NOTE Judy Garland, Jack Haley and Margaret Hamilton WERE all not the FIRST choices for their particular roles but look how great that turned out.

    Anway, OZ the Great and Powerful is a wonderful PREQUEL not trying to take anything away from Wizard of Oz but give nods and had is own magic by telling the Wizards own story = enjoyable family movie. Hoping for mega box office GOLD, well done all involved.

Follow Caryn James

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Critic's Choice: Three Lively Discoveries ...