BEST ACTOR IS SUDDENLY THE MOST INTERESTING CATEGORY
This is still George Clooney’s award, with Brad Pitt the runner up. But there were two terrific surprises. Gary Oldman, virtually ignored by other awards except the BAFTAs, turned up for his amazing, restrained performance in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy. And Demian Bichir - I know, Demian who? – squeaked in for his affecting role as a Mexican gardener in A Better Life. (Photo below; he also played Castro in Steven Soderbergh's Che.)

NINE BEST PICTURE NOMINEES
There could have been as few as five or as many as ten under this year’s wackadoodle rules, and a smaller number would have focused attention on the inevitable battle between The Artist and Hugo – or is it The Artist vs. The Descendants? With nine nominees, the possibilities for spreading votes changes the dynamics. There should have been seven. The Help, Moneyball, Midnight in Paris were all expected. Tree of Life wasn’t, which sends a message somebody wants to be seen as artistic. Then there were the lily-livered nominations: War Horse is there because it’s big and it’s by Spielberg. The mediocre Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close is there because ... well, who knows? Earnest 9/11 subject?
The Descendants seems less and less likely -- I'm on Team Hugo.
YAY - ONLY TWO SONGS NOMINATED
Anything that cuts down on those bloated, cringe-inducing production numbers is fine with me. This year’s Best Song nominees are from The Muppets (“Man or Muppet”) and Rio (“Real in Rio”). Kid-friendly music may not make for the most sophisticated Oscar show, but it’s pretty hard to go wrong with Muppets!
THE INEVITABLE WHO WASN’T
Albert Brooks, widely considered a sure thing for a Supporting Actor nomination for Drive, wasn’t. But as he Tweeted yesterday , the nominations were only going to tell him if he had to show up for another awards ceremony where Christopher Plummer won.
The race is just heating up and will be fascinating to watch - maybe more fascinating than the Billy Crystal old-timers show.
7 Comments
Jay | January 25, 2012 6:14 PM
What Johnnie said, basically. Like it or not, the man is probably unknown to most people. I suspect quite a few non-racist folks read or heard of his nomination and said "Demian who?" It's possible to overestimate the "global reach of film culture." Maybe someone should take a poll.
And I don't know how to add the accent to his name, so cut me some slack on that, please.
Johnnie | January 25, 2012 5:29 PM
I'm really confused about why James's post is seen as racist.
Can someone please explain this to me.
Bichir is a complete unknown to 99% of worldwide audiences. He starred in a film that, while certainly a fine motion picture, was unseen by 99.5% of the world's population. Therefore, his Oscar nomination was justifiably considered a surprise by everyone on planet Earth except whichever members of the acting branch voted for him
A headline that consists of the words (FILL IN THE BLANK WITH AN UNKNOWN ACTOR GETTING AN OSCAR NOMINATION) WHO?God dammit, can we stop accusing everyone of racism?
Frako Loden | January 25, 2012 3:19 PM
"I know, Demian who?" What's with the "I know"? I guess you're calling out to others as ignorant as you are.
Michael Guillen | January 25, 2012 3:07 PM
Caryn Who? Oh yeah, her. The one who can't spell her name like a normal Karen. The one who thinks she's amusing to make dismissively racist jokes about Demián Bichir, one of Latin America's finest actors, on the presumption that no one will know a Mexican actor. The one who can't even remember to put the accent over his first name. Time for a colonic, Caryn. You're so stuffed full of yourself and your predisposition to American cinema that you can't recognize the global reach of film culture. Why indieWIRE allows you to spew this peurile crap is unbelievable.
Rania | January 25, 2012 9:58 AM
Just watched A BETTER LIFE last night. Bichir is fine in it, but I don't see it as an award-worthy performance, largely because he has to act in a mediocre, cliched, predictable film.