There was a big piece in the San Francisco Chronicle today about the film. It was about as positive as one could ask for, and kind of delightfully written, but it's always fascinating to see the tiny distortions to the truth that are made to maximize journalistic appeal. The same is true with filmmaking in general, but journalism purports to a greater fidelity to "truth." It's all true, but it's phrased in ways that make the truth just incrementally more absurd and dramatic. I'm not complaining. I actually like it. But it's like looking into a distorting mirror at the funhouse. It's fun, but is that really how one looks?