Apparently, neither did Kael -- sort of. During our recent Criticwire panel discussion on the state of film criticism in the digital age, Entertainment Weekly's Owen Gleiberman, who knew Kael, revealed an interesting tidbit: her notorious one-time-only viewing habits, while "substantially true" were also kind of exaggerated. In fact, Kael did watch some movies that she loved multiple times (no, not "Ghostbusters").
The topic came up as the panelists began discussing how online publishing has affected journalists' deadlines. Gleiberman and I had both attended the "Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2" press screening the night before -- and we both had to file our reviews within hours of watching the film. That led into a conversation about how quickly articles now need to be developed, written, and edited -- and whether that is substantially different from the way things used to be in the industry. As an aside, I mentioned how some critics willingly choose never to see a movie more than once -- like Kael -- which prompted this response from Gleiberman (around the seven minute, ten second mark of the original audio) about whether that apocryphal story about her was actually, uh, unprocryphal:
"I knew her, and I can tell you that story is substantially true, but it is something of an exaggeration. There were certain movies that she loved that she saw a number of times. Like 'Nashville,' she saw three nights in a row."
So there you have it: mostly fact with some embellishment, but as the old saying from "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance" goes: "When the legend becomes fact, print the legend." By the way, I've seen that movie at least three times.
Listen to the entire "The Art of Film Criticism in the Digital Age" panel discussion.