Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
Daily Reads: Why No One Remembers "Avatar," the Best Blu-rays and DVDs of 2014, and more Daily Reads: Why No One Remembers "Avatar," the Best Blu-rays and DVDs of 2014, and more Criticwire Survey: Last-Minute Gifts for Movie Lovers Criticwire Survey: Last-Minute Gifts for Movie Lovers 'The Interview' Reviews: So How Is That Movie That We're Not Going to See? 'The Interview' Reviews: So How Is That Movie That We're Not Going to See? Star-Ledger's Stephen Whitty Loses His Staff Job Star-Ledger's Stephen Whitty Loses His Staff Job So Long, 'Stephen Colbert': How His Star-Studded Finale Sent Up and Outdid Talk-Show Schmaltz So Long, 'Stephen Colbert': How His Star-Studded Finale Sent Up and Outdid Talk-Show Schmaltz The Scrambled Sexuality of 'Frozen's "Let It Go" The Scrambled Sexuality of 'Frozen's "Let It Go" Numerical Proof that 'Boyhood' and 'Transparent' Were Critics' Overwhelming 2014 Favorites Numerical Proof that 'Boyhood' and 'Transparent' Were Critics' Overwhelming 2014 Favorites Cahiers du Cinema's Top 10 Movies of 2014: 'Goodbye to Language,' 'Under the Skin,' 'Love Is Strange' Cahiers du Cinema's Top 10 Movies of 2014: 'Goodbye to Language,' 'Under the Skin,' 'Love Is Strange' Why the Unanimous Praise for 'Boyhood' Is Bad for Film Criticism — and for 'Boyhood' Why the Unanimous Praise for 'Boyhood' Is Bad for Film Criticism — and for 'Boyhood' Sleeper of the Week: 'Maidan' Sleeper of the Week: 'Maidan' Kevin B. Lee's 'Better Than Boyhood': 'Goodbye to Language,' 'Dear White People' and More Kevin B. Lee's 'Better Than Boyhood': 'Goodbye to Language,' 'Dear White People' and More It's Official: HBO Is Remastering 'The Wire' in the Wrong Aspect Ratio It's Official: HBO Is Remastering 'The Wire' in the Wrong Aspect Ratio Sony's Chair Sends Racist Emails, Also Greenlights More Movies Starring Black Actors Than Anyone in Hollywood Sony's Chair Sends Racist Emails, Also Greenlights More Movies Starring Black Actors Than Anyone in Hollywood Beyond 'The Interview': 6 Movies About North Korea You Can Watch Right Now Beyond 'The Interview': 6 Movies About North Korea You Can Watch Right Now 'Disney Deaths' and 'Big Hero 6': How Children's Stories Process Loss 'Disney Deaths' and 'Big Hero 6': How Children's Stories Process Loss Why 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens' Fills Me With Dread Why 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens' Fills Me With Dread Why 'Spring Breakers' Is the Movie of the Year Why 'Spring Breakers' Is the Movie of the Year Watch: David Ehrlich's Top 25 Movies of 2014, a Video Countdown as Good as the Movies Themselves Watch: David Ehrlich's Top 25 Movies of 2014, a Video Countdown as Good as the Movies Themselves Film Comment's Best Movies of 2014: 'Boyhood' Plus 'Birdman,' Plus a Cotillard Twofer Film Comment's Best Movies of 2014: 'Boyhood' Plus 'Birdman,' Plus a Cotillard Twofer Daily Reads: 'The Interview' and the End of Satire, Why 'Selma' Matters Today and More Daily Reads: 'The Interview' and the End of Satire, Why 'Selma' Matters Today and More

Criticizing the Critic of Everything

Criticwire By Matt Singer | Criticwire March 26, 2012 at 8:03PM

Should an action film be judged purely on its merits as an action film? Or should it aspire to something greater than that?
5
'The Raid: Redemption.
'The Raid: Redemption.

I ask a lot of questions on Criticwire.  Too many?  (See, there's another.)

I don't know.  The questions aren't because I'm wishy-washy -- although I am -- but because I'm trying to start a conversation with readers.  I tell you what I'm thinking, you tell me what you're thinking.  When I see that someone has taken something I wrote to heart and written something back in response, that gets me excited.  

So I was really excited to see that Jonathan Poritsky of The Candler Blog picked up a few of the questions I tossed off in last week's piece "The Pros and Cons of the Critic of Everything" and turned that into his own post entitled "Criticizing Everything."  My original essay was inspired by Glenn Kenny's admission that he was relieved not to have to review "The Hunger Games," or to form an opinion about it, and the question -- I'm not the only one with questions! -- of whether a critic should feel obligated to have an opinion on everything.  From there, Poritsky takes the idea of a "critic of everything" in a direction I hadn't necessarily intended.

While the original piece was about "The Hunger Games," Poritsky's is about "The Raid: Redemption" and the social media reaction to Roger Ebert's 1-star pan of the otherwise critically acclaimed Indonesian action film.  As Poritsky debated the film's value, the conversation eventually moved into an area that, I imagine, is going to come up a lot on this blog: the endless discussion over whether to judge a movie based on its relative merits or its overall merits.  In other words, should a solid action film like "The Raid: Redemption" be compared only to other action films or to films of all genres?  Poritsky says a movie must stand against everything:

"When I say 'The Raid: Redemption' isn’t a very good film it’s because I’m judging it the same way I would any other film (a Spielberg, a Malick, a Brakhage, etc.), based on my own knowledge of the cinema. If your experience is different, then great! This is why there is no shortage of critics and viewpoints... I get that 'The Raid: Redemption' is better than a lot of the other crappy action films of the last few years, so people are jumping to laud it in hopes of seeing more like it. But this is how the bar gets lowered; this is how we end up with multiplexes full of varying levels of crap. So no, I don’t think it’s a good movie, and I think it’s preposterous to tell me I’m judging it wrong. I’ll be as good a critic of everything as I can be."

Not quite the critic of everything I had in mind -- which was more about open-mindedness than creating a single evaluative framework that can be applied to any and all films -- but an interesting one nonetheless.  Maybe it is my wishy-washiness coming out, but I kind of want to have it both ways on this issue.  I want to be able to exalt "The Raid: Redemption" on the relative merits of its meticulously choreographed fight scenes, breathtaking long takes, and inventive use of camera placement; as an exemplar of technique in the world of modern action, the film is certainly without recent equal.  But I also want to remind the people who have proclaimed "The Raid" the greatest action film in decades (like the unnamed critic who did so on the film's poster) that action films are more than savvy technique.  Plot, characters, and dialogue matter too.  American action films could learn a thing or two about visual style and editing from "The Raid" but if they look to it for advice on how to deal with narrative and dramatic arcs, they're not going to get very far.

So what do you think? Is it valid to call "The Raid" a really good action film even if you don't think the elements of it besides its action are all that spectacular?  Or is it unfair to give something genre props?  If your instinct in praising a movie is to say that it's "Pretty good for what it is," are you really saying that it's not very good at all?  It's a question I'll have to pose to the critics who participate in our weekly Criticwire surveys, the first of which premieres tomorrow morning on this blog.  

I know, I know.  More questions.  

This article is related to: The Raid: Redemption


E-Mail Updates