Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
Love or Hate 'American Sniper,' We're Brought Together By Its Bad Fake Baby Love or Hate 'American Sniper,' We're Brought Together By Its Bad Fake Baby 'Better Call Saul': 'Breaking Bad' Prequel Accepts the Charges 'Better Call Saul': 'Breaking Bad' Prequel Accepts the Charges 'Girls' Outrage Tracker: Season 4, Episode 2, 'Triggering' 'Girls' Outrage Tracker: Season 4, Episode 2, 'Triggering' Why the Unanimous Praise for 'Boyhood' Is Bad for Film Criticism — and for 'Boyhood' Why the Unanimous Praise for 'Boyhood' Is Bad for Film Criticism — and for 'Boyhood' 'The End of the Tour' Sundance Reviews: Jason Segel Impresses as David Foster Wallace 'The End of the Tour' Sundance Reviews: Jason Segel Impresses as David Foster Wallace 'Girls' Outrage Tracker: Season 4, Episode 1, 'Iowa' 'Girls' Outrage Tracker: Season 4, Episode 1, 'Iowa' The A.V. Club's 25 Best Sitcom Episodes of the Past 25 Years: 'Seinfeld,' 'The Simpsons' and More The A.V. Club's 25 Best Sitcom Episodes of the Past 25 Years: 'Seinfeld,' 'The Simpsons' and More First Reviews of Johnny Depp's 'Mortdecai': Scraping Bottom With a Waxed Moustache First Reviews of Johnny Depp's 'Mortdecai': Scraping Bottom With a Waxed Moustache Not at Sundance? Watch 14 Festival Films Via Sundance's #ArtistServices Not at Sundance? Watch 14 Festival Films Via Sundance's #ArtistServices 'Strange Magic' Reviews: Yup, That's Late Period George Lucas, All Right 'Strange Magic' Reviews: Yup, That's Late Period George Lucas, All Right Daily Reads: Stop Pitting 'Broad City' Against 'Girls,' How Political Pundits Warp 'American Sniper,' and more Daily Reads: Stop Pitting 'Broad City' Against 'Girls,' How Political Pundits Warp 'American Sniper,' and more 'Going Clear' Sundance Reviews: A Scorching Takedown of Scientology 'Going Clear' Sundance Reviews: A Scorching Takedown of Scientology Meet the Indiewire | Sundance Institute Ebert Film Criticism Fellows, 2015 Meet the Indiewire | Sundance Institute Ebert Film Criticism Fellows, 2015 Now Streaming: 'The Interview' and Other Movies That Didn't Get Us Threatened Now Streaming: 'The Interview' and Other Movies That Didn't Get Us Threatened Cahiers du Cinema's Top 10 Movies of 2014: 'Goodbye to Language,' 'Under the Skin,' 'Love Is Strange' Cahiers du Cinema's Top 10 Movies of 2014: 'Goodbye to Language,' 'Under the Skin,' 'Love Is Strange' Criticwire Classic of the Week: Jim Jarmusch's 'Dead Man' Criticwire Classic of the Week: Jim Jarmusch's 'Dead Man' The Scrambled Sexuality of 'Frozen's "Let It Go" The Scrambled Sexuality of 'Frozen's "Let It Go" 'Disney Deaths' and 'Big Hero 6': How Children's Stories Process Loss 'Disney Deaths' and 'Big Hero 6': How Children's Stories Process Loss Daily Reads: Movie Monsters That Look Like Genitalia, Why It Feels Like There's Too Much TV and More Daily Reads: Movie Monsters That Look Like Genitalia, Why It Feels Like There's Too Much TV and More Daily Reads: The Epic Uncool of Philip Seymour Hoffman's Career, How Scarlett Johansson Subverts Her Good Looks and More Daily Reads: The Epic Uncool of Philip Seymour Hoffman's Career, How Scarlett Johansson Subverts Her Good Looks and More

EW Goes HuffPo, Will Pay Bloggers in "Prestige"

Photo of Sam Adams By Sam Adams | Criticwire March 27, 2014 at 12:10PM

Good news, aspiring writers! Entertainment Weekly is looking to hire you! The bad news: You can't pay your rent in cool points.
5
EW

Good news, aspiring writers! Entertainment Weekly is looking to hire you! The bad news: You can't pay your rent in cool points.

According to an article in DigiDay, the Time Warner subsidiary is going the platform route, with plans to recruit writers from "social media and J-schools" to provide content for its new "Community" vertical. 

Old-media companies are moving away from the top-down approach to editorial content, too. Forbes was at the vanguard of this shift, opening up its site to outsiders two years ago; it now has about 1,200 contributors. More recently, EW sibling People announced that it would allow celebrities to publish content directly on People.com.

Still, Time Inc. hasn’t often been accused of being on the digital cutting edge, although that may start to change when it spins off as an independent company from Time Warner. And the brand seems to want to distance itself from other publishers-as-platforms. Asked where EW fits in comparison with some of the aforementioned others, White stressed that The Community is not just a play for traffic.

"While, yes, there’s SEO value, this is really about super-serving the entertainment audience," she said. "The filter here is, the quality does have to be up to the EW standards. This is not kind of a free-for-all by any stretch of the imagination."

Stifle, if you will, the gag reflex inspired by the word "super-serving" for just a moment and let's think this through. Not every site can afford to pay for content: Though I've never asked anyone, I've accepted pitches from writers I wasn't able to pay. (It may be a thin one, but I do believe there's a line there.) But this is Entertainment Weekly, which is owned by one of the larger media companies in the world. Surely they've got some money floating around -- or, more precisely, Time Warner has the cash, even if they're not inclined to share it. What it comes down to is they want to generate more traffic without spending more money, which while not exactly a sin -- I also want that, plus a pony -- leaves their editors in an awkward position. Although it's still crumbling, EW still has a powerful brand, but it's based more on entertainment reporting than it is criticism, which I mean as no slight to fine critics like Owen Gleiberman, and as something of a slight to the less-fine ones. So the "Community" section seems like a way to expand one element of the site without damaging the other. (For numerous reasons, including but not limited to legal liability, it's unlikely they'll be handing reporting duties off to unpaid contributors.)

From this account, it sounds like EW is trying to square the circle, soliciting unpaid writers while preserving at least the appearance of editorial oversight. (I'm not sure how you reap the benefits of publishing writers for free by paying people to edit them; time will tell.) But it would be nice if we could drop the fiction that writers can be "compensated in the form of prestige," when that prestige evaporates the instant EW opens its digital doors to glorified interns, or that "access to the brand’s editors" means something when all those editors can do is assign more unpaid work. The overriding rationale is that these kind of foot-in-the-door gigs can "lead to something," but that can't happen if the jobs they're meant to lead to keep being replaced.


E-Mail Updates