"It is what it is. F—ing trees, man. The plants. F— it.”
Like Weaving and Hanks, Wahlberg made his comments in the context of promoting another movie; in his case, it was 2010's "The Fighter." And while I appreciate the candor, and I don't doubt their honesty (like I'm going to disagree that "Transformers" is meaningless?), let's not forget how this game is played. After all, when "Angels and Demons" came out, Hanks seemed to like it okay. Don't believe me? Just ask Tom Hanks:
Yeah that "Angels and Demons" sure is a "fabulous game... loaded with subtext." Or it's a piece of junk. Whatever.
Again, I'm not picking on Hanks; merely observing that when you've made something quote-unquote "important" (like "Cloud Atlas" or "The Fighter") one of the easiest ways to prove its importance is by retroactively belittling something you made in the past that was "unimportant." I happen to like "Cloud Atlas" quite a bit, and Hanks probably does too. But if ten years from now he's promoting another movie, would you really be that surprised if he took a couple of good natured shots at it? "Can you believe what they had me doing and saying in that movie? A Cockney gangster with a buzz cut and mutton chops?"
Until that new movie comes out, it's always a masterpiece. After that, well, things change. And, hey, I kind of like "Turner and Hooch."
Read more of "You Can Criticize Your Own Movie If..."