Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
First Reviews: 'Hail, Caesar!' Is the Coens at Their Best First Reviews: 'Hail, Caesar!' Is the Coens at Their Best A.O. Scott and Why It's a Critic's Duty to Be Wrong A.O. Scott and Why It's a Critic's Duty to Be Wrong Kristen Wiig's 'AbracaDeborah' Is the Non-Existent Sundance Movie Everyone's Talking About Kristen Wiig's 'AbracaDeborah' Is the Non-Existent Sundance Movie Everyone's Talking About Is There More to Louis C.K.'s 'Horace and Pete' Than Its Surprise Release? Is There More to Louis C.K.'s 'Horace and Pete' Than Its Surprise Release? Film Writers Narrowly Escape Tragedy in Sundance Accident Film Writers Narrowly Escape Tragedy in Sundance Accident Natalie Portman's Doomed Western 'Jane Got a Gun' Gets Shot Down by Critics Natalie Portman's Doomed Western 'Jane Got a Gun' Gets Shot Down by Critics 'Manchester by the Sea,' Indiewire's Sundance Critics Poll Winner, Is Part Tragedy, Part Farce 'Manchester by the Sea,' Indiewire's Sundance Critics Poll Winner, Is Part Tragedy, Part Farce New Classics: Greg Mottola's 'Adventureland' New Classics: Greg Mottola's 'Adventureland' Daily Reads: Why the Disney Vault Needs to Go Away, How the Republican Primaries Have Broken 'SNL,' and More Daily Reads: Why the Disney Vault Needs to Go Away, How the Republican Primaries Have Broken 'SNL,' and More Daily Reads: The 100 Jokes That Shaped Modern Comedy, When TV Drama Cover The Iowa Caucus, and More Daily Reads: The 100 Jokes That Shaped Modern Comedy, When TV Drama Cover The Iowa Caucus, and More The Totally Insane Ending to 'Little Boy' Has Critics Fuming The Totally Insane Ending to 'Little Boy' Has Critics Fuming Daily Reads: The 'Hollywood Blackout' Controversy at the 1996 Academy Awards, Everybody's a Critic and That's How it Should Be, and More Daily Reads: The 'Hollywood Blackout' Controversy at the 1996 Academy Awards, Everybody's a Critic and That's How it Should Be, and More Could 'The Hateful Eight' Kill Film Instead of Saving It? Could 'The Hateful Eight' Kill Film Instead of Saving It? Adam Sandler's 'The Ridiculous 6' Is Getting Some of the Year's Most Hilariously Scathing Reviews Adam Sandler's 'The Ridiculous 6' Is Getting Some of the Year's Most Hilariously Scathing Reviews One of the Best Movies of 2015 Is Now Available On Demand. (Also It's 16 Minutes Long.) One of the Best Movies of 2015 Is Now Available On Demand. (Also It's 16 Minutes Long.) 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens': Why Rey's Hypercompetence Is a Feature, Not a Bug 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens': Why Rey's Hypercompetence Is a Feature, Not a Bug 'The Gift': A Great Thriller (Almost) Ruined By a Terrible Ending 'The Gift': A Great Thriller (Almost) Ruined By a Terrible Ending New Classic: Asghar Farhadi's 'A Separation' New Classic: Asghar Farhadi's 'A Separation' Daniel Radcliffe's Farting Corpse Stars in the Movie That's Tearing Sundance Apart Daniel Radcliffe's Farting Corpse Stars in the Movie That's Tearing Sundance Apart IMDb Ranks the Top 25 Movies of the Last 25 Years IMDb Ranks the Top 25 Movies of the Last 25 Years

The Semiotics of 'Siskel & Ebert'

Photo of Sam Adams By Sam Adams | Criticwire July 17, 2014 at 11:56AM

The co-host of "Ebert Presents" explains why "At the Movies" worked with Roger Ebert, and couldn't with anyone else.
2
Ignatiy Vishnevestky, Roger Ebert and Christy Lemire
Ignatiy Vishnevestky, Roger Ebert and Christy Lemire

In a fascinating essay that's part personal reminiscence and part theoretical deconstruction, the A.V. Club's Ignatiy Vishnevetsky delves into the history of Siskel and Ebert's "At the Movies,"  including his role as one of the show's final co-hosts. Vishnevestky was only 24 when he was picked by Ebert and his wife, Chaz, to occupy the seat across the aisle from the Associated Press' Christy Lemire on "Ebert Presents at the Movies."

Vishnevetshy was, he admits, "alternately manic and smug" at first, and he takes his share of the blame for "Ebert Presents'" eventual failure. (The headline "I Killed 'At the Movies'" is a bit much.) But in examining why the show succeeded for so long, even surviving the death of Roger Ebert's indispensable sparring partner, Gene Siskel, and his replacement with the comparatively lightweight Richard Roeper, Vishnevetsky digs deep into the semiotics of television itself. TV producers, he says, "talk a lot of theory — mostly semantics and pragmatics — though they couch it in the soft, slippery language of viewer feelings.... The whole business of readability, which treats the show as text, smacks of unwitting academia."

Vishnevestky is not the first to parse "Siskel & Ebert" as a sitcom about two guys in a movie theater. But he enlarges that observation with his behind-the-scenes insights, examining how every detail, from the set to the iconic "Thumbs Up" rating system, was designed to establish and sustain that frame.

The balcony set (ours was in the original "Sneak Previews" studio, WTTW) is much smaller than it looks, designed around the old principle of forced perspective.... The wide shot of the screen is recorded separately, since the cameras usually sit in the space where the lower level of the theater (actually a digital matte) is supposed to go.

The director is Don DuPree, a seemingly ageless Southerner with a taste for bespoke shirts and chunky wristwatches; he has been directing these shows since the early ’90s. Despite having overseen hundreds of episodes of "Siskel & Ebert" and "Ebert & Roeper," Don is not a movie buff, which makes him the team’s ultimate authority on what is and isn’t engaging. Crosstalks — the unscripted back-and-forths which are the core of the show — are judged on their ability to pique non-moviegoer Don’s interest. He works from the control room, along with Chaz Ebert, who effectively runs the show.

Everything, in other words, is designed to sustain the narrative frame, and to reinforce the show’s relationship to its viewers — everything except the reality of hosting the show, a fragmented process full of teleprompter reads, booming intercoms, and white-hot lights. One inevitably develops an appreciation for Siskel, Ebert, and Roeper as actors, able to remain in-character despite flubs and technical snafus, and to read the teleprompter and then improvise an argument in the same voice.

What eventually killed the show, Vishnevetsky suggests, is not (just) his performance as a host — which, to be fair, wasn't really wasn't all that bad — but the transition from a culture where critics served as cultural guides and one where they're islands in a rushing tide of opinion and commentary:

The theory goes that, in order to hook a TV viewer, they must be convinced that they’re in on the show. You continually summarize and re-cap. The secret to hooking an online reader is to make them think that they’re being left out of some larger phenomenon, and the only way to rectify this is to click right here, right now.

The two media work off social anxiety; TV cools it, and the click cycle stokes it.

I'm not sure I entirely buy this — explainer posts and aggregation sites, for one, soothe FOMO anxieties rather than heightening them — but it's true that Ebert was the last critic to wield that kind of paternalistic influence, a writer of whom they could feel that if they'd heard his views on a movie, they knew what they needed to know. Maybe Vishnevestky was, as he says, the wrong man for the job, but when the job's unofficial title is Be Roger Ebert, it's pretty tough to nail the particulars.

This article is related to: Roger Ebert (1942-2013), Siskel and Ebert, Life Itself


E-Mail Updates