NYT | "Fresh Starts: One for Iraq, One for Bush"

by David Sanger, in the New York Times today:

If Mr. Bush's accomplishments in Iraq are judged on the events of the past 14 months, he has clearly succeeded in only one of his tasks: dismantling a tyrannical government. The so-far fruitless search for unconventional weapons — the primary justification for invading Iraq — undermined his credibility, making what Mr. Bush described as a war of necessity appear to have been one of choice. His argument that a change of rule in Iraq would quell terrorism is similarly questioned, undercut by a rewritten State Department assessment that now concedes an increase in terrorist incidents. The attacks on American troops in Iraq were not part of the count.



Comments

Thank you for all the information. I shall check back soon.


Please visit some helpful info on BASIC Rules of Poker BASIC Rules of Poker http://www.cafexml.com/ http://www.cafexml.com/ .



Trackback (ping URL)

(06/27/07) vizio television - shit-happens 837960 Eye of vizio television


Post a Comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Name
Email
URL
Comments


Remember personal info?