TV: The New Indie Film?
"The Wire" alone did a great job of keeping numerous indie films bumped down on my Netflix cue for months as I immersed myself in the amazing Baltimore drama of cops, drug dealers, politicians, and everyone else connected to David Simon's masterpiece, and I can't help wonder if other quality shows are keeping folks glued to their laptops and televisions and out of the movie theaters. And would any film from last year generate a whopping cover story in the New York Times Magazine like Mad Men did this Sunday? With the brilliant Season 1 about to hit DVD and Season 2 starting next month, this show will definitely garner many new fans as it keeps its already loyal base stuck to AMC this summer. I feel like when I talk to indie biz insiders and just regular film fans alike I hear much more buzz about "The Wire," "Battlestar Galactica," "Weeds," "Big Love," "Dexter," and "Lost," than I would have heard about practically any film in release last year (aside from "There Will Be Blood.") And with the entire series of Twin Peaks now out of DVD, (the show that started it all, with its polished cinematography, complex storyline, and riveting score), anyone under the age of 30 (who has probably never seen the show) has 29 episodes of that classic to dive into as well. And don't even get me started on "The Sopranos," which just realized a gigantic box set of the entire six season series on DVD, of which I've never seen. I'm saving that one for retirement.
If Hollywood blockbusters are projected in a such a crappy way, than it's no surprise that "The Puffy Chair" screening I went to last summer at the Angelika Center had some sort of high pitched whine during the entire screening. All of this for $10-$12? It's no wonder people wait for it on DVD. (After they finish watching "Heroes.") Posted by jamesisrael on Jun 24, 2008 at 11:50AM |
Filed under Question of the Day
|