That's the question I asked myself shortly after assembling
the gallery of filmmakers featured in several recent Indiewire articles about
the festival's upcoming lineup. The term sprang to mind because I immediately started compiling a list of notable directors in this year's program. The myth of the Sundance breakout tends to dominate the festival's reputation, just as the usual cast of acclaimed auteurs usually define Cannes.
However, Sundance has its own roster of regulars precisely because it discovers a lot of emerging talent. It's also commonplace to dismiss Sundance for favoring red carpet glamour, which is sometimes merited when the movie associated with said carpet utterly blows. But the truth is that Sundance can and does attract first-rate filmmakers, both from its so-called "family" and beyond--from the Duplass and Zellner brothers to So Young Kim and Quentin Dupieux. Does that mean that they'll deliver? Well, that's a different question we'll have to wait until next month to answer. Needless to say, just because you're a rock star doesn't mean you can always rock out.
5 Comments
Eric | December 5, 2011 10:31 AM
Chaz: I'm not saying that the festival lineup is mandated by said friendships, but rather that, because many of these filmmakers have played Sundance in the past, they are naturally friendly with its programmers. And I don't think anything is wrong with that. I also firmly believe that, while most festival programmers actively program bad movies for various reasons, they also (at least at this festival) don't accept anything solely based on existing relationships. So it's not JUST the friendship that counts, nor do you need that friendship to get into Sundance. I think it's more that the friendship happens as a natural result of getting into the festival.
nancy olmez | December 2, 2011 10:59 AM
It means your friends with Trevor Groth usually