Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

August: Osage County

by Leonard Maltin
December 27, 2013 1:49 AM
  • |
Photo By Claire Folger - Courtesy of The Weinstein Company

Asked what it was like to have to trim almost half of his play’s running time for a screen adaptation, Tracy Letts replied, “It was excruciating.” I can only imagine, as some characters clearly get short shrift in this condensation of the Pulitzer Prize-winning show. Yet as a showcase for a host of gifted actors, it remains potent and entertaining.

Photo by Claire Folger - Courtesy of The Weinstein Company.

Watching Meryl Streep is always a joy, I daresay a privilege. She tears into a juicy role as matriarch of a deeply troubled Oklahoma family. The death of her husband (Sam Shepard) brings far-flung siblings and children back to their homestead for the funeral and its aftermath. Over the course of a few days, and especially over the dinner table, old wounds are reopened, long-held resentments aired anew, and layer by layer, we discover the ugly skeletons in this family’s closet. When the air clears, it’s up to the individuals to decide what they should do next.

The cast couldn’t be better, and each one gets a chance to shine—some more consistently than others. Julia Roberts is quite good as the daughter who stands up to her mother. Margo Martindale is wonderful (as always) as Streep’s earthy sister, and Chris Cooper equally shines as Martindale’s husband. Juliette Lewis and Julianne Nicholson have sterling moments as Roberts’ sisters, while Dermot Mulroney and Ewan McGregor do yeoman service as men who married into the dysfunctional clan. Abigail Breslin and Misty Upham make the most of their relatively minor roles. I’m not sure Benedict Cumberbatch’s role, as Martindale and Cooper’s callow son, was worth the time it took for him to fly from London to Oklahoma, but he does as fine a job as one would expect.

Photo by Claire Folger - Courtesy of The Weinstein Company.

Director John Wells takes a straightforward approach to this sprawling material and allows us to be spectators, taking in the dirty laundry one piece at a time. For a film that relies so much on dialogue, it flows surprisingly well.

Yet as good as it is, this movie made me want to see the four-hour play; I’m sorrier than ever that I missed it on Broadway and in Los Angeles. Given the exigencies of mainstream moviemaking, Letts and Wells decided to focus on the two dominant female characters played by Streep and Roberts. That’s a reasonable trade-off, but I couldn’t help thinking there had to be more to the male characters than is revealed in this screenplay. As a moviegoer, I shouldn’t be thinking about what’s missing.

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    


  • Peter | May 30, 2014 4:48 AMReply

    Disappointed by seeing this when the preview material look absolutely hilarious. Its narrative conclusions was disappointing, too.

  • mike schlesinger | December 27, 2013 6:12 PMReply

    I did see the play and adored it. The chief victim of the cutting is the Cheyenne housekeeper. Onstage, she functions as the audience surrogate and brings us more fully into the drama. On film, she's been reduced to a near bit. (So is the cop who was at one time Roberts' boy friend, but he was never an important character so that loss is no big deal.) And of course there's the deservedly-derided tacked-on "extra" ending. I did enjoy the film very much, but I wonder if I would have liked it even more had I come to it cold...a risk that's always inherent with an adaptation.

Email Updates

Latest Tweets

Follow us

Most "Liked"

  • Too Much Johnson-Joseph CottenOrson Welles Discovery Now Online
  • Hercule Poirot-David SuchetThe First and Final Days as Poirot: ...
  • New Laurel & Hardy Book: Love At First ...