Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

film review: Prince Of Persia: The Sands Of Time

by Leonard Maltin
May 28, 2010 4:00 AM
4 Comments
  • |

I have nothing against a juvenile action-adventure yarn with a touch of fantasy thrown in, and while I can’t pretend to get inside the head of a 12-year-old boy, I enjoy summoning my inner child whenever such a film has great spirit and rousing action scenes. This one, I’m sorry to say, feels mechanical in its storytelling, and presents us with heroes and villains that are “types” rather than genuine, fleshed-out characters one can care about.

Jake Gyllenhaal is likable enough, and the actors who join him play their parts as well as can be expected, including the beautiful Gemma Arterton, as the princess who alone understands the mystic power of a dagger that can alter “the sands of time.”

It’s a good thing Ms. Arterton is beautiful, because this is one of those movies that—in spite of its expansive, Middle Eastern backdrop and enormous sets—chooses to play most of the scenes involving its main characters in ultra-closeups, the kind where—

—after a while you find yourself examining the pores in the actors’ skin. I suppose this will play well on an iPhone, but it’s pretty distracting on the big screen.

Director Mike Newell shoots and stages his action scenes in a way that’s even more frustrating: major stunts (and there are a lot of them) never seem to take place in plain view. If, for example, a character is to mount a horse during a frantic escape scene, then slide down to the side so his pursuers can’t see him, the action is so fragmented that we never actually see the stunt take place. All we get is the set-up and the result. (This same fragmented approach to action drove me crazy in the last James Bond film, Quantum of Solace.) What’s the point of having able-bodied stunt people if their work is obscured through the shooting and editing process?

As for visual effects, Prince of Persia does what other Jerry Bruckheimer productions have in the past. Its story builds to a climax that involves a massive scene of chaos and destruction…but the elements of this sequence are so huge, and obviously unrealistic, that there is no emotional connection with the characters whose survival is at stake as all hell breaks loose.

I don’t mean to dissect a movie that is clearly intended as escapist entertainment, and nothing more. But there is good escapism and then there’s this. Even the comedy-relief character played by the wonderful Alfred Molina seems shopworn, an amalgam of better-written figures from a dozen other films.

Undemanding 12-year-olds who don’t squirm at two-hour movies based on video games may not share my criticisms. But if you’re male, older than 12, and you have a choice between this and Sex and the City 2, I’d suggest staying home and reading a good book.

  • |

More: Film Reviews

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

4 Comments

  • Jason | May 31, 2010 3:55 AMReply

    I thought 2009 had a pretty good summer movie season with District 9, Star Trek, The Hangover, Surrogates, Terminator Salvation and Harry Potter 6 (though I'm one of the few people who didn't like the Dark Knight or Wall-E either).

  • Dan | May 30, 2010 7:05 AMReply

    This looks like usual Jerry Bruckheimer trash, and this is going to be a terrible summer movie season. Even worse than 2009...it's all going downhill. 2008 was probaby the best summer movie season we will ever have: Dark Knight, Iron Man, Wall-E, Tropic Thunder, Hellboy II....the list goes on. All character-driven movies that also piled on really impressive scope and action as topping. Last year the big hit was Transformers 2, which as near as I can tell nobody on the planet actually enjoyed, and this year probably won't have a hit on that scale...Toy Story 3 is the only hope.

    If we really need to set aside several months to only have movies where things blow up, at least do it well. Something being "escapist entertainment" is not an excuse for shoddy storytelling. Nothing is less "entertaining" than these Jerry Bruckheimer movies filled with paper cutout characters and mystical babble and action movie tropes. Where is the entertainment value in that?

  • Chris | May 29, 2010 8:57 AMReply

    The only really solid summer movie I have seen so far is Robin Hood. I thought Iron Man 2 wasn't bad, but it didn't surpass the original or anything, which I usually hope for a sequel to do. The only movies coming out this summer that I am genuinely looking forward to are Toy Story 3, Inception and Robert Duvall's new film Get Low. Mr. Maltin, I know you weren't a fan of The Dark Knight, but are you looking forward to Inception at all?

  • Jason | May 28, 2010 6:58 AMReply

    Wow, this movie year kinda sucks. I dont' know why I was looking forward to Prince of Persia, maybe because it was directed by the talented Mike Newell (or maybe 'cause I like the video games). Unfortunatly neither of these things made me enjoy this new summer wannabe blockbuster and as much as I love films I think Leonard's recommendation of staying home and reading a book is a excellent one. I really hope this movie season picks up soon.

Email Updates

Latest Tweets

Follow us

Most "Liked"

  • Melanie Lynskey-Joe SwanbergHappy Christmas
  • Magic in the Moonlight-Colin Firth-Emma StoneMagic In The Moonlight
  • Snow White Marketing Campaign-9th WeekThrowback Thursday: See Disney’s Snow ...
  • Curtain-David Suchet-PoirotWhy David Suchet Came So Close To Missing ...
  • Douglas-Keaton- Clay EnosAnd So It Goes


leonardmaltin