Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Now You See Me

by Leonard Maltin
May 31, 2013 7:30 PM
  • |
Now You See Me-680
Photo by Barry Wetcher, SMPSP - © 2013 Summit Entertainment, LLC.

This exhausting film harps on the magician’s ultimate trick, misdirection. That word describes the very nature of Now You See Me, which purports to tell a clever story when all it’s doing is whirling in an endless spiral.  (That spinning is literal as well as figurative: I actually felt woozy as a result of the camera’s endless swooping and swirling.) So what is it about? That’s hard to say; the three credited screenwriters might have differing views on the subject. I don’t even know if Ed Solomon, Boaz Yakin and Edward Ricourt worked together on this patchwork script.

As the movie opens, we meet street magician Jesse Eisenberg, shady mentalist Woody Harrelson, daring stage magician Isla Fisher, and slick con artist Dave Franco. They are all summoned to a Brooklyn apartment by a mystery figure; the next thing we know they’re performing together in Vegas under the sponsorship of fat cat Michael Caine…and under scrutiny from magic debunker Morgan Freeman. Then an apparent bank robbery puts FBI agent Mark Ruffalo and Interpol detective Mélanie Laurent on their case. The four delight in fooling and frustrating this law-enforcement pair and lead them on a merry chase to New Orleans and New York City. Along the way there are multiple chases, surprises, and near-misses.

Morgan Freeman-680
Photo by Barry Wetcher, SMPSP - © 2013 Summit Entertainment, LLC.

The characters are sketchily drawn, so the success of this film depends almost entirely on the storytelling, which is exceptionally cluttered. What annoys me most is that the film doesn’t trust bona fide stage magic and repeatedly sets up impossible “tricks” and situations. As it turns out, that’s just a prelude to the final, ultimate reveal, which is stupendously bogus.

It’s a crime to waste so much talent on this piffle. Director Louis Leterrier is a supposed action expert, but all he proves here is that he knows how to induce vertigo in an unsuspecting viewer.

A good magician doesn’t just perform tricks; he casts a spell. This annoying movie never pulls off that particular feat.



Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    


  • Jeffrey | June 4, 2013 8:38 PMReply

    Jesse Eisenberg is a good actor, but he's radically miscast here. He doesn't portray a hip character very well. He's much better at playing an outcast. If that makes his range limited, so be it.

  • Jarod R. | June 3, 2013 10:52 PMReply

    The mere trailer of this film convinced me not to go see it. Jesse Eisenberg is one of the most annoying creatures on the planet.

  • Norm | June 1, 2013 6:39 PMReply

    At least the review wasn't a total loss, like Iron Man 3, I learned a new word.."piffle", coulda been worse...

  • Bill Cappello | June 1, 2013 5:10 PMReply

    Well, that does it for me. I use Leonard's reviews of any films in which I may be interested in seeing, as a strong guide to making my decision to pay $10 to see anything. I'll wait until this one is out on DVD and rent to watch it at home.

  • Dick May | June 1, 2013 3:50 PMReply

    Thanks for you warning about the camera movement. Somehow certain movie makers have the feeling this is "natural", instead of both uncomfortable and distracting.
    Maybe some day tripods will come back into fashion.

  • Jeffrey | June 1, 2013 12:41 PMReply

    Wow. I was eagerly anticipating what this film might be. What a shame.

  • Nick | June 1, 2013 5:25 AMReply

    I liked it. I think you're wrong. The plot was very interestingly connected and the action was directed well.

  • Nick | June 1, 2013 5:25 AMReply

    I liked it. I think you're wrong. The plot was very interestingly connected and the action was directed well.

  • Dbenson | June 1, 2013 1:58 AMReply

    "Magic debunker?" It sounds like an "acting debunker" ("He's only PRETENDING to be Lincoln!"). It's no secret that non-supernatural forces are at work; Freeman's character seems more analogeous to someone who can reverse engineer a particularly boggling piece of technology.

    From Houdini on, debunking properly called has been directed at those who claim their illusions are real (phony mediums, psychic surgeons, etc.). Real magicians, like actors, are proud to define their work as art, not reality.

    Don't mind me. I just get like this.

Email Updates

Latest Tweets

Follow us

Most "Liked"

  • Hercule Poirot-David SuchetThe First and Final Days as Poirot: ...
  • New Laurel & Hardy Book: Love At First ...
  • Blind Husbands-Erich Von StroheimThrowback Thursday: Von Stroheim!