
Reeves shares the screen with such formidable filmmakers as George Lucas, Martin Scorsese, James Cameron, David Fincher, Steven Soderbergh, and Danny Boyle, to name just a few marquee names, along with product developers and executives, film archivists, and many of the world’s leading cinematographers.
I anticipated a heated debate about the merits of 35mm vs. digital capture and projection, and that’s certainly one component of the film (with Christopher Nolan and his d.p. Wally Pfister as 35mm purists), but Side by Side has more lasting importance as a document of recent history in the movie industry. It chronicles the first attempts to create high-performance video and then each stage on the road to developing digital cameras that leading filmmakers would embrace.

If you’ve followed this topic, from near or far, I don’t think you’ll come away with any revelations, but you will have surveyed the recent and current filmmaking landscape in a clear-eyed manner, and that’s the best springboard for further debate and discussion. Side by Side is a significant piece of work; I suspect its historical value, as a snapshot of our time, will increase with each passing year.
RT @leonardmaltin: 'Fast & Furious 6' has some exciting action sequences, but I wish it were altogether a better film http://t.co/4KVdXItINo #MovieCrazy
Posted 1 minute ago
RT @leonardmaltin: 'The Hangover Part III' is a dreary, lamebrain comedy that ruins whatever fond memories we have left of the 1st film http://t.co/i4jcIItOXZ
Posted 36 minutes ago
RT @leonardmaltin: 'The Hangover Part III' is a dreary, lamebrain comedy that ruins whatever fond memories we have left of the 1st film http://t.co/i4jcIItOXZ
Posted 1 hour ago
RT @leonardmaltin: 'The Hangover Part III' is a dreary, lamebrain comedy that ruins whatever fond memories we have left of the 1st film http://t.co/i4jcIItOXZ
Posted 1 hour ago|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| |
![]() | ![]() |
0 Comments