
Colin Farrell does a good job in the lead, so long as you don’t compare him with Arnold Schwarzenegger, who owned—and helped define—the earlier film. Whether or not you admire that movie, it made an impression. With a new generation of visual effects at his command, director Len Wiseman has the ability to paint on a broader canvas, but since we see this caliber of movie magic on a regular basis it’s no longer an Event. The one exception is a gripping chase scene involving futuristic hovercraft vehicles: this is unquestionably the highlight of the picture.
The central premise, about a man who has had his memory wiped clean and replaced, along with a new identity, derives from Philip K. Dick’s short story “We Can Remember It For You Wholesale.” Both movies use it as a springboard for the screenwriters’ inventions, turning the film into more of an action vehicle with science-fiction overtones.

What drags the movie down in its second half is the wearying sense that none of the principal characters are truly human at all: they’re indestructible, repeatedly surviving high falls and beatings that by any measure of reason should turn them into pulp.
The new screenplay, by Kurt Wimmer and Mark Bomback, doesn’t try to copy the Verhoeven film verbatim, which is to its credit. But what we get instead is unexceptional, and that’s too bad.
Famous #MoonInCapricorn @AshleyJudd @leonardmaltin @JohnLeguizamo @RealRonHoward @jay_Statham @ZooeyDeschanel @PaulaAbdul @Seal @snooki
Posted 3 hours ago
Classic Film Reader Daily is out! http://t.co/KvETLxmVmK ▸ Top stories today via @leonardmaltin @moviebungalow @AmericanFilm
Posted 7 hours ago
#LeonardMaltin: "indifferent 3-D discourages people from seeing films that make brilliant use of the medium" http://t.co/2DEdbFTEsh
Posted 15 hours ago
@leonardmaltin hey how are u
Posted 23 hours ago|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| |
![]() | ![]() |
3 Comments
Leslie landberg | August 28, 2012 9:32 AM
$200 million could not buy this movie a heart. Pass.
Brian Marshall | August 6, 2012 1:05 PM
The world did not need and does not need this remake. End of discussion.
film fan person | August 3, 2012 7:59 PM
I agree with you in that this film was bad. The film looks amazing but the screenplay is so full of plot holes that the film seems to have been written by a 1st grader. The film is also very very dull.