World War Z

Reviews
by Leonard Maltin
June 21, 2013 12:15 AM
4 Comments
  • |
Photo by Jaap Buitendijk - Courtesy of Paramount Pictures
I can’t pretend to be a zombie-movie aficionado, but I found World War Z to be tense, absorbing, and scary. Brad Pitt is established as a devoted husband and father at the outset so we never lose rooting interest, even though the challenges he faces grow more extreme as the story progresses. By the time we get to the nail-biting climax he pretty much represents us onscreen, desperately trying to clear one hurdle after another in an effort to save the day and return to his wife and kids. This is tried-and-true storytelling and it works like a charm.

The visual effects are impressively deployed by director Marc Forster to make every trial and encounter seem horrifically real, from the first zombie outbreak in Pitt’s hometown of Philadelphia to later, more grandiose set-pieces in Jerusalem, on a full-sized jet, and in a laboratory building in Cardiff, Wales.

Pitt isn’t depicted as a superhero. He’s gutsy and seemingly fearless, but it’s his resourcefulness and his ability to keep cool in the midst of chaos that makes his character so admirable.

I understand that the screenplay—which is credited to a handful of writers who pitched in during the movie’s long, troubled gestation—is very  loosely based on Max Brooks’ best-selling book. I can only judge the finished product, which I enjoyed, all the more so because the filmmakers were forced to downplay graphic gore in order to get a PG-13 rating.

Photo by Jaap Buitendijk - Courtesy of Paramount Pictures

On the other hand, I found watching this in 3-D to be an annoyance. It added nothing to the experience and left me with a headache. (Like many  current releases it wasn’t shot in 3-D, with its director and cinematographer staging each scene to take advantage of the process, but converted after the fact. It shows.)
By aiming to please a mass audience, the people behind World War Z may turn off horror-movie diehards who crave more blood and guts, but they’ve made a movie that wimps like me find not only palatable but satisfyingly scary.

          

You might also like:
Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

4 Comments

  • Norm | June 21, 2013 8:16 PMReply

    Maybe if Mel Brooks made a Zombie film it would be interesting...

  • Martin Grams | June 21, 2013 5:10 PMReply

    The novel takes place ten years after the Zombie War and is not a fictional novel, rather, it is a series of interviews with survivors who each tell a story. The interviews are presented in chronological order so it tells the story from the first outbreak to the reconstruction of society. It is a fictional report commissioned by the U.N. Social commentary, politics and general realism to how we would cope with such a scenario is explored in each of the interviews ranging from two to thirteen pages in length. The zombies do not run and I can understand why the writers might not have wanted to do the movie in documentary style. Will watch it Wednesday, hoping it is faithful to the novel and not just using the novel's name. With no central character in the novel, I suspect it won't be faithful.

  • Patrick | June 21, 2013 1:37 PMReply

    The Scottish Bagpipe Capital!
    That's an interesting location choice, I wonder if there were many shooting difficulties in regards with the weather.

  • Brian | June 21, 2013 7:06 AMReply

    "from the first zombie outbreak in Pitt’s hometown of Philadelphia to later, more grandiose set-pieces in Jerusalem, on a full-sized jet, and in a laboratory building in Cardiff, Wales. "

    It wasn't shot in Philadelphia though... It was Glasgow, Scotland. :o)

Email Updates

Latest Tweets

Follow us

Most "Liked"

  • Draft Day
  • Joe
  • Only Lovers Left Alive
  • Movie Heaven, Courtesy Of TCM


leonardmaltin