GIRLS RECAP 5: HARD BEING EASY

Television
by Sarah D. Bunting
May 13, 2012 10:55 PM
10 Comments
  • |
More like "Hard Writing Consistently." What was that?
 

For four episodes, Girls has stayed on the right side of believable. Not likeable or admirable, necessarily, when it came to the three leads and their behavior (I'll excuse Shoshanna from the discussion for the time being), but we don't have to like characters, or find them attractive physically or emotionally, to see something familiar in them and in the situations they move through. Our interest in a narrative isn't always about comfort, or escape. Sometimes, it's about recognition. I wouldn't characterize Girls as holding a pitiless mirror up to a generation or anything, but I think it gets at certain truths that lie underneath (and/or in) the pretension and self-absorption and unprofessional bumbling, or at least it tries to.

I don't know what "Hard Being Easy" was trying to do, besides annoy/baffle the audience. (Mission accomplished.) The episode has a handful of neatly observed moments, and the usual complement of too-awkward-to-watch bits . . . but the awkwardness didn't come from the characters this week. It came from Lena Dunham losing control of the material.

The Marnie/Charlie storyline picks up shortly after the end of the last episode, and it's well done—but it has to climb uphill from a ridonkulous beginning in which Charlie forces Hannah to read aloud from the journal in front of him and Marnie. Hannah goes along with this, despite the fact that 1) Charlie (well, mostly Ray, but whatever) violated her privacy, 2) Marnie threw a drink on her and called her a bitch, 3) neither of them apologized, and 4) whatever Hannah's involvement, the only credible action for any character would be to hole up elsewhere until the couple's storm blew over. And Hannah not only goes along with it, she corrects them, saying it's "notes for a book," not a journal, and asks for feedback on the writing. Yes, Hannah lives in her own bellybutton, but this isn't believable behavior from anyone.

The rest of Marnie's subplot resonates, though, from Ray overplaying the loyal-best-bud card, to the revelation that Marnie has never gone to Charlie's apartment (once there, she admiringly notes that it looks like "a Target ad"), to the flashback to college in which Marnie and Charlie meet. Marnie has taken an unknown drug at a party and is disappearing down a paranoia-hole. Hannah tends to her for a while, then heads off to dance with Elijah (to the Scissor Sisters, after Elijah "curates" Marnie's bangs with a flick of his forefinger. . . . Hannah really thought that guy was straight? For two years?), leaving Charlie to mind Marnie. The narrative pun on "high maintenance" aside, it makes perfect sense that this is how they met, that Charlie ministered to her from the beginning. (Charlie's wig, however, is inexplicable. I get why the actor is wearing one, but—that one? Did Charlie just come from an '80s-Stamos-impersonator contest?)

Their break-up/make-up/break-up talk the next day is dead-on. Marnie turns up in "my party dress and my sorry face," sure that she can change his mind. Charlie points out repeatedly that she isn't in love with him anymore; she asks repeatedly that he not break up with her. We've all had that convo, fumbling and protracted, desperate not to rip the Band-Aid off because "better the devil you know" and all that. This is where Marnie's at with it, refusing to admit the facts (and probably thinking she'd have been the one to do the dumping). Charlie purposely wounds her by saying he thought he recognized her at the party from a porn flick, Sophomore Sluts; she's shocked that he watches porn. (Ladies: they alllll watch porn. Even the Charlies. It's usually nothing pathological; please stop taking this personally. Thanks.) After she offers him the blowjobs she should be giving him anyway, they end up in his low-ceilinged bed nook, having sex, and he orders her to be nice to his friends and "act like [his] life is real." She agrees. He asks her to keep her face close to his. She does. Then he says either "say 'I love you'" or "stay; I love you"; either way, Marnie physically recoils, saying she can't, and whangs her head on the roof of the bed-nook. Immediately Charlie sits up to make sure she's okay: "I'm right here. I'm riiiight here." That's the problem, of course, and she whispers that she wants to break up.

And this is the least awkward sex in the episode.

Jessa gets it on with an ex-boyfriend, a subplot that seems to exist solely so the two of them can burst into Jessa and Shoshanna's apartment, pawing each other, before Shoshanna can announce herself or vacate. Shosh has to hide behind an Ikea curtain for the duration. The ex gets a high-dudgeon line about "a very tumultuous relationship in which one's Vespa gets destroyed for no reason" that I chuckled at; everything else flopped. Jessa finally notices Shoshanna and teases her for being a creeper, and Shoshanna, always talking at a high rate of speed prior to this point, doesn't say a word to contradict her. . . . What? We got the "virgin is both attracted and repelled" note last week, and we don't watch the show for slapstick—fortunately, since slapstick is demonstrably not its strength. What is this story doing?

Perhaps it's an effort to postpone the inevitable boinkfest between Jessa and Jeff Lavoyt—and that part of Jessa's story this week is sharp. Jessa's in the Lavoyts' bathroom, getting ready to meet the ex; Lavoyt's leaning boyfriendily in the doorway. Mrs. Lavoyt comes upon them there, chatting, and Kathryn Hahn is excellent in the scene, holding the awkward silence exactly the right amount of time, lying that it's okay that Jessa is using her lipstick ( . . . of course she is) because she doesn't want to come off like an unhip harridan.

It's also not really okay that Jessa, hearing about Hannah's boss's handsiness, suggests that Hannah "should hump" Richard "for the story." It's a hundred percent something Jessa would do, and most likely get away with, because she's a confident beauty who wears a kimono to her babysitting job. It's a hundred percent not something Hannah, as written to this point, would do, but, for reasons I can't fathom, she does it. Yeah, yeah, "for the story"—I don't see it. And based on the too-long, all-over-the-place scene that results, Dunham didn't either. Richard asks Hannah for a turkey sandwich; she tells him to cut the crap, because she knows he wants to fuck her. I write in my notebook, "Oh, this is a dream sequence." It isn't, and it's interminable, Hannah insisting that it's what Richard wants, Richard asking if she's high, Hannah switching gears and threatening to sue, Richard snorting that "there's no suing app on your iPhone" but adding that he's not going to fire her because she's "great," Hannah offering to forget about suing for one thousand dollars . . . it just. Keeps. Going. Richard is still trying to convince her to calm down and go back to work when Hannah whines, "I just tried to fuck you, sue you, and extort you! I'm fuckin' nuts, why would you want me in your office?" Perhaps that's Dunham signaling that she knows the twist is ridiculous, but the plot doesn't work, as farce or as commentary. (Hannah's big kiss-off line—"Someday I'm gonna write an essay about you? And I am not gonna change your name. And then you can sue me"—is just weak.)

Alas, the script isn't finished taking an idea over the top and then not knowing how to get back—but like others in the ep, this week's Hannah/Adam sequence starts from an interesting premise about the things we choose to hear. Hannah goes over to Adam's house to find him wearing a shirt. . . .  Just kidding. He never, ever wears a shirt. At this point, I know that guy's nips better than I know my own. When Hannah tells him what went down at work (sort of; she says "there was a sex scandal"), he grunts, "Sometimes you say shit that sounds made up"—an on-point comment, since she's also "made up" the idea that her straight talk in the prior episode (and their ensuing intercourse) has bonded them into a couple. "Surprise": Adam didn't hear it that way. What he heard is her saying they shouldn't have sex anymore. But then you kissed me, Hannah points out. "Because you were sad," Adam shrugs. And then we had sex, she points out. "Because we were kissing," Adam duhs, before telling her, "These things have an expiration date—six months or until you stop having fun," and Hannah isn't.

That 100-monkeys-typing brand of observation, simultaneously precise and insensitive, is one of the things that makes the Adam character ring true for me. Hannah, trying to make Adam jealous by over-sharing that she "almost" fucked Richard, buys time with a trip to the bathroom, and as she sits on the toilet, her eyes well up. She's wearing another dress that doesn't suit her—she looks like a hacky-sack with bad posture—and all of that rings true for me too.

But then she comes out to find Adam in his bedroom, jerking it. That he's doing it while Hannah's still there, after turning her down for sex, is galling, as she notes, but it's still in character for both of them—and it's still in character that she can't make herself get angry and/or leave. But then Adam prompts her to verbally abuse him as a turn-on, and she goes along with it, and the scene is once again too long and too aimless, and Dunham’s direction doesn’t illuminate why Hannah is doing this or what she's feeling about it, and when Hannah demands cab fare as part of the "you're a bad boy" stroke-fest, it loses me completely. I don't buy Adam as the masochist when he's gotten off on degrading dirty talk in the past, I don't buy Hannah taking control in this fashion, and the editing is a hash, but the primary problem is a flatness. The scene feels calculated to provoke, theoretical.

That's the ep as a whole. The plots begin with recognizable situations, but veer into almost academic explorations: what if we said this, what if we made her do that, wouldn't it be funny if the other thing. It's not the lack of "realism" (realism isn't always good storytelling, vis. the sixth season of Buffy the Vampire Slayer and the accurate but repetitive downward spiral of its heroine). It's that I can't relate to these situations, or these characters in them, and based on the faltering humor and tempo of the episode, I'm not sure Dunham could relate to them either.

Sarah D. Bunting co-founded TelevisionWithoutPity.com, and has written for Seventeen, New York Magazine, MSNBC.com, Salon, Yahoo!, and others. She's the chief cook and bottle-washer at TomatoNation.com.

You might also like:
Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

10 Comments

  • darci | May 25, 2012 5:54 PMReply

    Write a comment...First off, I got way excited when I heard "Infinity Guitars" by Sleigh Bells at the beginning of this episode, and then was even happier that they used it again when Marnie heads to the coffee shop to talk to Ray...love that tune!

    Anyway, as for the episode, I loved the Hannah/boss thing - I've totally seen scenarios almost exactly like that in the workplace, that totally hit home in an uncomfortable but hilarious way (I've actually been the Jessa in this scenario with friends..i know, i know...). Also, speaking of Jessa, I love her, and how she's always good for a great line or two per episode, and I loved the "I did you a favor!" comment about the Vespa int his episode

  • MsC | May 17, 2012 10:26 AMReply

    I agree that the 'we're both gross - I'm going to sue you' scene was both incredibly long and hard to find believable. I found the 'rape joke in an interview' scene hard to swallow, but on further reflection decided that maybe, just maybe, a person as unprepared for the adult world as she is could conceivably be that stupid. But propositioning her boss like that? It just doesn't work.

  • Barbara | May 16, 2012 9:39 PMReply

    Spot on Ted. I don't think that Girls is a about a logical development of character, or being realistic, or wanting to evoke empathy. It is, as you said, an exploration of situations and characters, pushing boundaries. That's not a bad thing at all, on the contrary, it has value for being original and portraying the wide varieties of the art of tv series, if that's what you want to call it. It's playing with absurdity, for the sake of being interesting and funny. I'm sorry to say, as I appreciate your elaborate writings on tv, but I do think you might be taking this show a tad more seriously than it ought to be taken, which is perhaps a pitfall almost impossible to avoid when you write close to 2000 words on a 28 minute episode.

  • poopdeck paul | May 15, 2012 8:01 PMReply

    Also, Adam didnt say , 'I love it when you talk to me like that', last week. He said, "I hate it when you talk to me like that", and in turn Hannah says, "And I dont want to talk to you like that either. I only want to be sweet to you." So he isnt the icy cold psychopath that people make him out to be. I think some more layers to his character will come before the seasons end. The actor is billed on HBO as the 5th lead, along with the 4 girls.

  • poopdeck paul | May 15, 2012 7:55 PMReply

    The masturbation scene was 100% realistic. Adam is into kink, and kink is a wide river to choose from, so to speak. He gets off on more than one aspect of it (and what he learned from porn), it is wholly believable to have him waylay her like this, and if you;ll note, he's still in charge through it, even though she robs him. He tells her to pull down her dress, Its not about that, he says. I think everything Ive read about this scene has just hit the surface. There is a bunch of subtext underneath the actions and words. Adam is selfish and horrible, but he's not a complete heel. There is some measure of compassion, his own horrible kind, for Hannah, and he truly seems to like her. I think he was upset at being rejected more than he let on and he was paying her back some. I also think she chinked his armor with that , I almost slept with someone declaration. And maybe turned him on, too. I think Adam is so closed off from his emotions that he cant express himself without resorting to some kinky shit. It's sort of telling, dont you think, that his fantasy has him directing her to abuse him, and make him say he's sorry... I think he was sorry on some level, for the breakup, for feeling rejected by her, and realizing that he wasnt some sex god to her, but that she was truly not having a good time with him and it smarts a little. When he mentions that exact thing to her, that she isnt happy, I think it's not just him being logical or throwing shit in her face, I think he truly feels a little upset about it. And in light of that, what he did, telling her No youre not happy, and if youre not happy Im not happy, but Im not changing, so you need to do whats best for you, was actually the mature, and nice thing to do for her. He did it in his typical shitty way, but I dont think he's malicious and if he wanted to keep using her , he would have. But i dont think he saw any of their onesided sex as degrading her, or he wouldnt give a shit what she said to him under those eyebrows.

  • Tara | May 14, 2012 11:40 PMReply

    She didn't direct this one. I thought her "Are you fucking kidding me?!" and then crying were incredible.

  • Bunting | May 14, 2012 2:19 PMReply

    @Sarah, good point. I think the tone is still Dunham's responsibility...but the unfamiliar too-longness of certain scenes (which weren't working anyway) might be Peretz.

  • Sarah L | May 14, 2012 10:43 AMReply

    Sarah, I think you are spot on. Thanks for articulating all of the things that were bothering me.
    One note: this was the first episode that was NOT directed by Lena Dunham (Jesse Peretz). Although the writing was indeed all over the place, some of the blame should definitely be shifted to him for some of the wierd tonal choices.
    And I still laughed when Jessa said "I did you a favor" in response to the Vespa drowning.

  • Bunting | May 14, 2012 8:34 AMReply

    On the off chance that this comment ISN'T just a deliberate misconstruing of what I've written in order to call me "whiny": relatable as MY behavior isn't necessary; relatable as ANY behavior is, or it pulls me out of the experience. Horizon-broadening is great, but I don't see why THAT'S an obligation of art if the actions don't fit with the characters as written -- if the broadening is occurring for its own sake, and presents as an academic and somewhat cynical pushing of boundaries solely for shock value.

    Not buying a scene because it doesn't work for the characters doesn't mean by definition that it's "foreign" or "too challenging." I used to proofread for "Penthouse"; the BEHAVIOR is not a new thing for me. It's that either Adam or Hannah as written to that point would have acted that way.

    You may feel that consistency bedevils small minds, and that's fine, but this is series television.

  • Ted | May 14, 2012 2:48 AMReply

    I've never understood why so much critical emphasis is placed on being able to 'relate' to characters or situations. What real value or benefit is there to that? Why does it matter at all? Isn't that a needy, small, whiny way to approach art? What obligation does art have to be relatable to you? I'd rather watch something that I can't relate to much at all--how else will I broaden my horizons? Why would I want to be shown only things I've felt or done? I want to see things that are completely foreign. Like that masturbation scene.

Follow Us

Latest Tweets

Follow us

Most "Liked"

  • A Video Essay On Jim Jarmusch: Dead ...
  • Stuck in the Middle: 30 Great Films ...
  • Stuck in the Middle: 30 Great Films ...
  • Days Like Lost Dogs: In Support of Loose ...