What are We Watching this Weekend?

If I can get out of here by 3:45, then I'll be heading straightaway to the Sunshine for some blockbuster art cinema: 2046. After that...maybe Stealth again? To answer filmenthusiast's question from last week: it's most certainly as funny in practice as I'd imagined.

And for all our loyal readers, that "we" above is meant for anybody who reads the blog--we're curious what people are seeing.

next | last Posted by clarencecarter on Aug 5, 2005 at 02:58PM | Categories: What are we watching?



Comments

Finally seeing 2046, as I vowed I would never see it on any of those various bootlegs that popped up over the past couple of years. Probably another showing of THE CONFORMIST or SARABAND.
Also, it seems like DARWIN'S NIGHTMARE is a necessity. The importance of the subject matter and the necessity of its being on film might trump the moral dubiousness of catching it at the union-dubious IFC Center on Waverly.

Then the weekend's wide open: catch up with MURDERBALL and HOWL'S MOVING CASTLE? Finally shell it out for BAD NEWS BEARS? Try to track down MY SUMMER OF LOVE? God, I go to the movies all the time...how am I so behind?

And is it worth it to trek out to Pleasantville for BARRY LYNDON. We could make a day of it.....

Posted by robbiefreeling on Aug 5, 2005 at 02:58PM

I'm glad somebody else understands how much fun Stealth is. It's the most unfairly reviewed film of the summer, and maybe the year, I think. Every critic put their best frowny face on when they sat down to watch it, because it's always easier to put something down humorously -- the lowest signifier of critical discernment -- than to engage with it on its own terms. And with all the good reviews handed out to piddling crap (Wedding Crashers, anyone?) picking on a fat, easy target like Stealth (so fat! so easy!)is a good way to pretend like you're discerning.
Wedding Crashers, meanwhile, is flat, obvious, and only "fun"in the sense that someone is holding a gun to your head and insisting as such in between dick jokes. (And in a way they are: it's been engineered as a pre-fab hit, so you have to see it, and if you don't like it, you're a killjoy, or a prude -- even though it's actually quite a conservative little movie we're talking about, not a patch on something truly juvenile and wonderful like, say, Harold and Kumar...) Stealth, meanwhile, is actually fun. Not necesarily proficient, but as a fearless inventory of cliches redeemed by a fetching earnestness, it's quite something. I mean, it's like the best action movie of 1987, but we get it now. And I put my neck out for it, too: www.eye.net/eye/issue/issue_07.28.05/film/onscreen.html

Posted by brotherfromanother on Aug 5, 2005 at 02:58PM

Midnight showing of "Barbarella" here in Pittsburgh, and "The Beat that My Heart Skipped" tomorrow. And "Hustle & Flow" yesterday.

Horrible movie season is over for the year! (mark your calendars for March through July of 2006)

Posted by Cryptic Ned on Aug 5, 2005 at 02:58PM

Raoul Walsh's REGENERATION at Museum of Moving Image--the closest thing the cinema has to Stephen Crane's 'Maggie: A Girl of the Streets' or 'How the Other Half Lives'

Posted by filmenthusiast2000 on Aug 5, 2005 at 02:58PM




Trackback (ping URL)



Post a Comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Name
Email
URL
Comments


Remember personal info?





Please visit www.ReverseShot.com