Re-Redacted

redacted4.jpg

Brian De Palma's Redacted has proven predictably, immensely divisive ... but would we want it any other way? Finally hitting selected theaters this week after months of scrutiny at festival screenings for the elite few, Redacted will finally now be available to those who have either criticized or praised it sight unseen. (Check out that imdb rating...do you think each one of those voters have actually seen the film yet?)

I'm not entirely convinced of Redacted's ultimate "success" or "quality"—but thankfully those are slippery, malleable terms, and the film needs to be evaluated in its own context. As a an attempt to make people use their own eyes, it's undeniably strong; as agitprop it's hampered by its own rigorous, at times ill-executed aesthetic.

Click here to read my own thoughts on the film, which have been available on Reverse Shot since its New York Film Festival premiere. And to get another side, here's RS staff writer Adam Nayman's new piece on the film in Eye Weekly, both a smart review and a nice summation of its reception thus far.

next | last Posted by robbiefreeling on Nov 15, 2007 at 01:06PM | Categories: Reviews



Comments

Is it me or is this movie getting zero publicity aside from reviews and De Palma interviews? Is there even a trailer, a TV ad?

Posted by Toadmonster on Nov 15, 2007 at 01:06PM




Trackback (ping URL)



Post a Comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Name
Email
URL
Comments


Remember personal info?





Please visit www.ReverseShot.com