Sydney Dispatch 10: Salute

SALUTE_film.jpg

It’s the greatest photograph in sports, perhaps one of the 20th century’s most indelible images: two African-American sprinters atop a victory dais, heads bowed, black gloves borne aloft, fists clenched in an act of astonishing—truly, according-to-Hoyle astonishing—protest. When Tommie Smith and John Carlos stepped up at the 1968 Mexico City Olympic Games to receive their gold and bronze 200m medals respectively, the stadium was struck silent. The Star Spangled Banner petered out after a scant four bars. As the victors exited, a smattering of boos rippled through Estadio Olímpico.

What of the third person in that picture? A slight, meek-looking Caucasian man stands to the left, facing away from the two Americans, looking awkwardly out of place. It appears that two of him could fit inside Smith, who towers over him like a hulking Adonis. He resembles the waterboy more than one of the Games’ great sprinters. His name is Peter Norman, the Australian silver medallist, and his unlikely involvement in this standstill historical moment motivates the documentary Salute.

I first discovered this picture almost a decade ago in a 50th-anniversary edition of the once-defunct, now-resurrected Life magazine. I don’t think my teenage self even registered another presence alongside Smith and Carlos, let alone his part in the moment. Next to the Americans, his protest is almost unnoticeable. Look a little closer, and you’ll see a small white disc adorning Norman’s left lapel—an Olympic Project for Human Rights badge—a minute gesture, and one so freighted with meaning because it was forbidden by the IOC. The late sprinter’s nephew, Matt Norman, uses this protest as a fulcrum to celebrate his uncle’s life, chronicling how each sprinter arrived at that moment, and then dealt with the volatile aftermath.

Norman’s film is slotted somewhere between DIY homage and ramshackle PBS feature, and there’s a lot of well-intentioned chaff, as Norman tallies race times on the road to the finals and essays miniature human interest biographies of each sprinter. Then he really finds stride as he contextualizes the protest. A world out of joint, a cauldron for discontent: the Martin Luther King riots, Russia invading Czechoslovakia, China’s cultural revolution, South African apartheid, the white Australia policy, and the pre-Olympic student protest turned massacre in Mexico City. The political activism found in the ’68 U.S. Track and Field team, spearheaded by another sprinter, Lee Evans, is placed in that continuum. The salute, recognizable as that of the Black Panther movement, finds resonance with so much more.

Matt Norman doesn’t seem to have the stuff to be an above-the-title documentarian. His rather pedestrian qualities do suit an effort whose most compelling passages reveal, to borrow a term from Hannah Arendt, the banality of heroism: Norman plucking that badge at the last minute from the chest of an American rower; John Carlos forgetting his black gloves at home, meaning that he and Smith had to share a single pair. John Carlos believes God ordained those three to be in that situation. Not so much destiny, I would say. More having an awareness of the moment, and seizing it.

As befits a eulogy, Norman the younger' is always dragging his uncle to the fore, and in their interviews, Smith and Carlos are happy to oblige. Genuine affection flows between them during their several interviews, as does an understanding that can only be borne out of mutual hardship. Amidst the politically charged lead-up to the Games, half-whispered rumors of an American protest had the team plagued by threats of career suicide, not to mention possible snipers in the stands ready to quell any protests, and had them at the centre of a debate whether or not the Olympics should truck with politics. Beset by these worries, Smith and Carlos became bravery’s avatars, and Peter Norman, their fellow traveller, was no less iron-willed for his part. Barred from the American Olympic team days after their display, Smith and Carlos were blackballed and found it difficult to secure employment stateside. Norman, despite being his country’s best sprinter, was subjected to similar, though subtler, ostracism. He never competed for Australia in the Olympics again. Through it all, Norman the elder is humorous and self-effacing in conversation, believing that he was “merely a rock cast into the deep, still waters,” depicted by his nephew with a modesty that makes Salute excel both as a personal document, and as a treatment of history viewed first hand.—JAMES CRAWFORD

next | last Posted by robbiefreeling on Jun 21, 2008 at 12:44PM | Categories: Festivals



Comments

Hi James,

Not a bad review really. I'm not sure whether you hated the film or loved it? I'm certainly honored by your comment that it's a DIY homage. You're right though it is a homage to a man that has always stood for those that can't stand up for themselves, a man that continued until his death in 2006 to honour Tommie and John over himself. A man that everyone forgot as the guy that stood up when no other white guy would ever do his equal and from a nephew that loves and misses his uncle. You see James, he wasn't meant to die. The trip to film Tommie, John and Peter wasn't meant to be for documentary film stuff but more for research for my upcoming drama 1968. So you're right.

You say I don't have the stuff to be an above the title documentarian even though the film and I got a 5 minute standing ovation at it's World premiere and was bought by Paramount Pictures and got a record $2Million dollars from the Australian federal government.? But you're right the film isn't about soldiers in Iraq, babies crying or big brother so people like you who aren't really that interested in where we all came from are more likely to sip latte's and read a comic than actually appreciate the fact that I did this film over 5 years, lost my house, lost my uncle and then was not welcome to actually tell the truth of what happened in mexico as others have tried (albeit without interviews from john and peter) to forecast the true events instead of the events that most journalists have made up over 40 years.

Next time though I'll give you a call and ask you your permission to put my name above the title. I suppose I should give up now as my next project is being done in the middle of Kabul. At least when I'm a pedestrian filmmaker there i'll be able to send post cards home to the kids saying "look kids" this bullet missed me by this much.

So the point of your review seems to be a little lost. Did you actually see the film. Did it teach you something? Did it make you cry like the 2000 people did at the Sydney Film Festival and then stood up to applaud the film or did it just make you want to be a critic like all others before you who have never done anything but slave over a keyboard putting out rubbish like you did here.

Anyway, I enjoyed your review of the film and hope you'll tell all your friends. Hang on, big brothers on tv... quick before you miss it.!

Matt Norman
Director/Producer
Salutethemovie.com

;)

Posted by Matt Norman on Jun 21, 2008 at 12:44PM

Hi all, i have just seen Salute, firstly i would like to say, i thought the film was way to long and could have been condensed to at least half that time While the subject matter was interesting i found it waffled and stilted.To be quite frank the quality of the production seemed like a 20yr olds first attempt at i-movie with Ken Burns after affects used to excess. Martin Smith's credit as a DOP is dubious as the film is chock full of historical archival footage. The rest looks like home movies on a crappy digicam, not good for the Big Screen.
Reading between the lines , i feel Peter Norman did seize the moment and wore the badge, but from a point view of activism or a human rights advocate but from the position of " it seemed like a good idea at the time "
Really what did Peter Norman do to champion human rights after this moment or before for that matter. NOW THERES A DOCUMENTRY!
So is it the saying "great times make great people" or is it " great people make great times" ?
But what is sad is the repercussions he faced from that moment. Being dropped from the Australian team along with all sprinters in 1972. And not formerly invited to the 2000 Sydney Olympics opening Ceremony. Thats a damn disgrace! But then again would Peter have gone with the treatment he got?
So all in all i think James Crawford did a accurate and good critique.
While Matt Norman produced an average doco.
All said and done thanks for the history lesson. Any way Big Brothers on! ;0 lol
JAY CEE

Posted by JAY CEE on Jun 21, 2008 at 12:44PM




Trackback (ping URL)



Post a Comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Name
Email
URL
Comments


Remember personal info?





Please visit www.ReverseShot.com