Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Freeing (Black) Science Fiction From The Chains Of Race

Features
by Andre Seewood
July 2, 2013 12:02 PM
26 Comments
  • |
Octavia Butler Sci-fi

Editor's note: A worthwhile repost of an old entry, in consideration of the post just before this one, as well as renewed conversations on "black sci-fi & fantasy"...

Having just finished reading African-American science-fiction author Octavia E. Butler’s short story,” BLOODCHILD,” the temptation to adapt the work for the cinema brings forth a host of complexities within the material that go far beyond the race of the author.  Ostensibly, BLOODCHILD is the story of human beings who have left earth, due to rising violence and the threat of enslavement, to share their lives on another planet populated by arthropod-like creatures.  

The price for peaceful co-existence between the two species is that selected male humans must be impregnated and bear the children of the aliens in an excruciatingly painful and bloody gestation process.  One male child has discovered that for all of his life he has been groomed for impregnation and if he refuses then the lives of his siblings and loved ones will be held in jeopardy.

In the afterword by the author, Butler makes explicit the themes and context of the story.  She states that on one level BLOODCHILD can be read as,” a love story between two very different beings,” and that its context is that of,” a coming of age story in which a boy must absorb disturbing information and use it to make a decision that will affect the rest of his life,” and finally she confesses that,” Bloodchild is my pregnant man story.”(1)  

Butler’s reason for explicitly detailing the themes and context in her afterword to the short story was driven by a central difficultly in the creation and critique of any science fiction by an African-American author: the certain tendency to see all science fiction by African-Americans as a metaphor or commentary about slavery or racial inequities past and present.  As Butler matter-of-factly asserts,” it amazes me that some people have seen “Bloodchild” as a story of slavery.  It isn’t.” (2)

Yet this overarching and obsessive need to see all science fiction by African-Americans as a metaphor or commentary on slavery or racial inequities tends to make the question of race a central theme within the work (whether it is actually there or not) to the exclusion of all the other prominent themes as Butler pointed out in her afterword to BLOODCHILD.  In placing the racial frame upon the science fiction/fantasy/or futurist work of African-Americans we too hastily discard the genuine scientific, fantasy or futurist aspects of the work, which in turn, weakens and /or perverts the author’s original intent.  In fact, many African-Americans use race as a default critique when we approach science-fiction solely as a means of side-stepping the science within the fiction no matter what the race of the author.

For example, many African-American film scholars (Ed Guerrero, Eric Greene, Adilifu Nama), critics and viewers insist upon reading Frank J. Schaffner’s PLANET OF THE APES (1968) as,” a dense racial allegory,” where a white male is,” a signifier of black victimization,“ that obscures the central scientific themes and historical source material of PLANET OF THE APES which were the 1925 Scopes trial, the concept of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, and the concept of time dilation in space travel.(3)  

Although later PLANET OF THE APES sequels did deliberately enhance the racial allegory with the saga, perhaps owing to the financial incentives of the Blaxploitation genre that was growing in popularity at that time, the original PLANET OF THE APES, adapted from French author Pierre Boulle’s 1963 novel by Rod Serling and Michael Wilson, is a stunning exploration of skepticism about the theory of evolution and the fear of knowledge that contradicts established beliefs in the face of mounting empirical evidence from an inverse perspective [that the superior apes are derived from the lowly humans].  These over-racialized readings of PLANET OF THE APES demonstrate how convincingly one can discard the “science” within the fiction to make the subject of race a central theme within any science fiction film or story.    

Returning to Octavia E. Butler’s BLOODCHILD, her insistence that BLOODCHILD is not a story of slavery in her afterword is a direct consequence of the over-racializing of the work of African-American science-fiction authors as metaphors or commentaries on slavery or racial inequities.  Neither Butler nor her characters in BLOODCHILD ever mention their race within the text.  In effect, to see BLOODCHILD as a metaphor about slavery is to deliberately obscure the more profound and disturbing aspects of the work which is of course the notion of male pregnancy and a boy’s coming of age on an alien planet where the adults have made a political accommodation to peacefully co-exist with their alien hosts that has troubling moral, physical and psycho-sexual consequences.

This is the “science” within the fiction that cannot by itself prohibit a racial critique but it certainly reveals how using race as a default critique of science-fiction by African-American authors perverts their themes and chains these authors to the topic of race no matter how much freedom they have within their chosen medium of artistic expression.              

For African-American filmmakers the over-racializing of the themes within a science-fiction story (whether an original story or adaptation) is ultimately inhibiting because those scientific, speculative or fantasy aspects that attracted you to the work in the first place can easily become obscured, diluted or discarded as “race” insidiously poisons the well of the fictional context and content.  It is a poisoned well that makes us all potentially see the genre of science-fiction,” through a glass darkly,” so to speak.  To put the matter plainly, the perceptual frame of racial inequality (past or present) can be applied to any story or film regardless of the author’s central themes; race is a catch-22; a prison house of interpretation from which it seems there is no escape or satisfying resolution.

For example, if you as a filmmaker omit African-Americans from the science-fiction story altogether then the critical concept of “structured absence” allows your critics to use any other non-white race, animal, or object within your film as a symbol of minority otherness and then “interpret” a racial commentary where you had not intended such a commentary to exist.  One needs only to read Ed Guerrero’s devastating analysis of Joe Dante’s GREMLINS (1984) and GREMLINS 2: The New Batch (1990) in his book Framing Blackness.(4)  

In regards to the absence of African-Americans in the GREMLINS films, Guerrero interprets the Gremlins themselves as symbols of minority otherness and asserts that,” the film’s socially repressed fears have to do with non-white minorities gaining political power, as Gremlins 2, satires the political subtleties of an increasing influential “minority discourse” in contemporary American life more than it plays upon latent anxieties over racial otherness.” (pg.65)  Although it could alternately be argued that many White American filmmakers were omitting African-American characters from their science-fiction films in a naïve and erroneous attempt to avoid racial issues and keep those issues from stealing focus from their central themes.

Conversely, if you place African-Americans in lead, co-lead or supporting roles in a science-fiction film, the critics can use the concept of “token presence” to suggest that the actors are performing blackness as a general commentary on race relations (contemporary, historical or speculative) as author Adilifu Nama does with his analysis of Will Smith in Alex Proyas’ I, ROBOT (2004) in his book Black Space.  In regards to more African-American actors gaining lead and co-lead roles in science-fiction films, Nama asserts that,” In the wake of September 11th, black representation in the science-fiction films of today may function to assuage an acute case of domestic paranoia.” (pg.40)

So that even with an African-American in the lead role of a science-fiction film the concept of token presence maintains race as a central theme to the exclusion of the “scientific” themes within the film.  Idris Elba’s supporting role as the space ship captain in Ridley Scott’s PROMETHEUS (2012) can be viewed as a commentary on race if we are willing to sweep aside and obscure the film’s central themes on the origin of man, inter-planetary bio-warfare, and the old filthy rich miser who desperately wants to cheat death at the expense of the lives of others.

Token presence can also allow us to use Bokeem Woodbine’s supporting role in Len Wiseman’s re-imagining of TOTAL RECALL (2012) as a racial commentary that can obscure the compelling political and psychological themes that are central to the work of celebrated science-fiction author Phillip K. Dick upon which the film is based.      

The full title of Nama’s book is revealing of the catch-22 of race: it is called BLACK SPACE: Imagining Race in Science-Fiction film. The title itself begs the question are we “imagining race” in science-fiction film as a means of obscuring the science and other themes that do not support a racial interpretation within the work?  As a filmmaker approaching the science-fiction genre with the ambition of casting African-Americans in your film, you will have great difficulty in finding a middle ground between the racialized poles of “structured absence” and “token presence”.  It would seem that as it concerns race in the genre of science-fiction, one is damned if you do and damned if you don’t cast an African-American.

One of the most difficult obstacles African-American writers and filmmakers must face when approaching the genre of science-fiction is whether or not to continue the pessimism of present day racial inequities in their visions of the future or whether or not to project an optimism into their visions of the future where racial inequities have been solved. It is literally a choice between a dystopic future and a utopian future where racial conflicts have either been solved as in a utopia or remain unsolved as in a dystopia.

The most pertinent question that might help in making the choice is: Are blacks treated better, worse or fairly in the future than they are today? This choice is of great importance because if the racial inequities have been solved then the writer/filmmaker must find conflicts within the drama beyond race which given the narrow perceptual frame through which many African-Americans view cinema, might be no easy task.

For example, in director Ridley Scott and writers Dan O’Bannon and Ronald Shusett’s science-fiction film ALIEN (1979), racial inequities were carried forward into the future by the character of African descent named, Parker (Yapet Koto) who held a mechanical engineering job that was on a lower pay scale than the other whites on the interplanetary mining ship, Nostromo. A fact that can be understood from his concern about their bonus pay which he was told would be revoked if they didn’t fulfill their mission directives. Moreover, he was a subordinate in the chain of command to nearly all of the other whites on the ship besides his fellow white co-engineer, Brett (Harry Dean Stanton). Parker’s death at the hands of the violent space creature was made all the more tragic since he was killed in a futile effort to protect a weak and hysterical white female crew member.

By contrast, Brian DePalma’s MISSION TO MARS (2000) projects an optimistic future where racial inequities, it is at least implied, have been solved by the example of the Luke Graham (Don Cheadle) character’s unguarded interaction amongst his white peers and colleagues as well as his command of the first human colony on Mars. It is clear that an optimistic perspective brings the science of the fiction to the forefront and allows the filmmakers and the writers to establish dramatic conflicts through those basic human qualities and frailties that transcend race.” (pgs. 50-51, Slave Cinema)

For African-American filmmakers approaching the genre of science-fiction, whether through an original screenplay or an adaptation, I would suggest that if you carry racial inequities forward into the future of your story context you might still be able to keep race from obscuring the central “scientific” themes of your work if you utilize what I call the development strategy.  As I detail in my book, SLAVE CINEMA,” The development strategy usually features an African-American character that is first seen in a minor supporting role, but through successive events and circumstances that reveal his or her cunning, intelligence, sensitivity, wisdom, strength, beauty or empathy this minor supporting role is developed into a lead or co-lead role within the story.

Roland Emmerich’s INDEPENDENCE DAY is one such film that employs the Development strategy concerning the African-American Air Force pilot Capt. Steve Hiller as performed by Will Smith. This character was first seen as a small part of a large multi-racial ensemble cast and the character is developed through the course of the film’s events and circumstances into a hero.” (pg. 70)  The Development strategy is particularly effective with integrated casts and with actors who are not well known.

Alternately, if you do not want to carry racial inequities forward into the future of your story context you just simply have to cast an African-American in the lead role and concentrate on the dynamics of the central “scientific” themes within the story.  For all intents and purposes once you’ve cast that African-American actor in the lead role or you have decided to use the development strategy to move an African-American character from a supporting role to a lead “heroic” role in a science-fiction film you have already effectively made a powerful and inspiring commentary on race regardless of the story context and theme.  

In choosing either path you can “side step” the catch-22 of race and the racial critiques of “structured absence” [no blacks at all] and “token presence” [one black as a commentary upon all blacks] by remaining faithful to those aspects that are specific to the genre you have chosen.  In short, you explore the “science” within the fiction instead of obscuring that “science” through a glass darkly with race.

And if seems as if it’s a question of money that is keeping African-American filmmakers from breaking out into the genre of science-fiction then we should take inspiration from the fact that many of the great science-fiction films of cinema history have been made with budgets far less than one would expect.  Consider films like La Jetée (1962) by Chris Marker, Alphaville (1965) by Jean-luc Godard, THX 1138 (1971) by George Lucas, The Man Who Fell To Earth (1976) by Nicholas Roeg, Stalker (1979) by Andrei Tarkovsky, The Last Battle (1983) by Luc Besson, The Brother From Another Planet (1984) by John Sayles, and They Live (1988) by John Carpenter; these were films all made by filmmakers who manipulated the formal structure and sound design of their films rather than high production budgets and expensive Computer Generated Imagery.(5)  

Even Ridley Scott’s Bladerunner (1982) saved money by recycling sets and miniature models from George Lucas’ Star Wars (1977) as well as utilizing cost saving measures like matte paintings and blue screen processing.(6)  

Creativity and imagination can always trump a high budget and lack of originality every time in the cinema.        

Knowing that there are many African-American scientists, physicists, explorers, engineers and astronauts that live and breathe in the world today as they did once throughout history (I am reminded of the great Lonnie George Johnson the inventor (SuperSoaker) and engineer and Valerie Thomas the scientist and inventor of NASA’s the illusion transmitter) we should guide ourselves through the genre of science-fiction with the notion that our “afro-nautical” characters are exceptions that prove the entire notion of black inferiority untrue by their very existence.  Therefore, we can concentrate on those scientific, fantasy, or speculative aspects of the genre that we enjoy without guilt, remorse or trepidation.

Perhaps the only thing keeping us as African-Americans from adapting the work of Octavia E. Butler, Samuel R. Delany, Andrea Hairston, even Phillip K. Dick or casting an African-American in the lead role of a science-fiction film is our fear of letting go of race as a central theme and embracing those other themes that transcend race and make us all human.  After all, if there is any truth to those famous words attributed to psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud,” Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar,” in reference to that certain tendency to over-analyze the inconsequential then perhaps the same is true in film,” Sometimes a man is just a man no matter what his race.”

Andre Seewood is the author of SLAVE CINEMA: The Crisis of the African-American in Film. Pick up a copy of the book via Amazon.com HERE.

NOTES

(1)Pg. 30, BLOODCHILD: and Other Stories 2nd Edition by Octavia E. Butler, Seven Stories Press, New York: 2005

(2) Op. Cit.

(3) Pg. 127, BLACK SPACE: Imagining Race in Science-Fiction Film by Adilifu Nama, University of Texas Press, Austin: 2008; See Also: Pgs. 11-17, PERFORMING WHITENESS: Postmodern Re/constructions in the Cinema by Gwendolyn Audrey Foster, State University of New York Press, Albany: 2003; “PLANET OF THE APES” as American Myth: Race, Politics, and Popular Culture by Eric Greene, Wesleyan University Press, New Hampshire: 1996.

(4) FRAMING BLACKNESS: The African-American Image in Film by Ed Guerrero, Temple University Press, Philadelphia: 1993.

(5) All production budget numbers are from imdb unless otherwise indicated.  Costs have not been adjusted for inflation, but the point is that the costs are low relative to the Hollywood average budget for a science-fiction film. La Jetée production costs are unavailable but we can assume they were low since the film is comprised of still frames photographed from a Pentax 35mm SLR camera and an Arriflex 35mm film camera that was borrowed for one hour, according to the director Chris Marker (see, La Jetée “Notes on Filmmaking” in liner notes the Criterion DVD Edition), Alphaville 220,000 francs, THX 1138  $777,000, The Man Who Fell To Earth $1.5 million according the producer Michael Deeley in his book “Blade Runners, Deer Hunters, and Blowing the Bloody Doors Off: My Life in Cult Movies” Pegasus Books 2009 , Stalker (unavailable), The Last Battle 600,000 francs/91,389 euros, The Brother From Another Planet $300,000, They Live 4 million dollars.  

(6) FUTURE NOIR: The Making of Bladerunner by Paul M. Sammon, Harper Books, New York: 1996

Features
  • |

More: Things That Make You Go Hmm...

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

26 Comments

  • Said in Los Angeles | July 4, 2013 1:07 AMReply

    Lengthy and detailed, yet it reads as though the neither writes, nor understands the genre. What was the point of this article again? The trials and tribulations of Black People in Science-Fiction? I'd like to have read more about Black peoples success in the genre.

  • Doug Dandridge | February 7, 2013 9:24 PMReply

    I think we should go back to scifi with only White, Anglo-Saxon males in space. Then when the comet hits the Earth that will be the end of the human race. In reality I always liked the way Star Trek handled it. Dr Richard Dystrom was called one of the most brilliant scientists in human space and there was no mention of his being black. Same with Commodore Mendez being Hispanic, or Uhura being a black woman, or Sulu being Japanese. I had read where the network wanted Roddenberry to only have white actors because the other ethnic groups might offend viewers (such as Southern White viewers and blacks, and Fillipino viewers and Japanese characters). But Gene stuck to his guns and said the future would not be like that. And I really believe that if and when we contact aliens our own ethnic differences will not really matter.

  • Ronald T. Jones | August 14, 2012 6:42 PMReply

    I've read a number of black speculative fiction authors who have written compelling, interesting, exciting, nail biting sci fi and fantasy without having to make race the central, driving element in their stories. I have done the same and it's not at all difficult to do. Black speculative fiction writers are lovers of science fiction and fantasy, otherwise we would not be writing in those genres. We love the science aspects. William Hayashi's seminal first in a trilogy tale about blacks colonizing the moon, for example, featured some fascinating technology and piqued my interest in anti-gravity. At the same time, his story is a social commentary.
    We as black sci fi/fantasy writers are as interested in telling great stories as white writers, but we also desire to address the paucity of black heroes, heroines, anti-heroes, and villains in these white-dominated genres. We're creating spaces for own characters while penning stories depicting their full humanity without feeling obligated to link race to their plight.

  • DjaDja N Medjay | August 8, 2012 2:19 PMReply

    Rise in Excellence. What a wonderful and important topic!!! As an Afro-Futuristic Author, it is important to me to acknowledge the existing genre of Science Fiction as a very culturally based genre surrounding European development of 'science'. I have enjoyed this genre thoroughly and I grew up with it, however, in the background I knew that we can never be properly represented in this field without our cultural view and approach to this genre. From an Afrikan point of view, anything scientific is based on an internal technology rather than an external technology. Of course, stating this viewpoint will invite many opposing views which is fine, yet no one can not ignore the fact that Afrikan technology always dealt with the connection of an individual with the power source and the machinery used. The person becomes a necessary component. In addition, AT (Afrikan Technology) does not seek to control the forces of nature, it seeks to be one with it. Whereas, as we can see in many Sci-Fi flicks, the usual downfall is the scientist or an individual not heeding the warnings of nature. Event Horizon, Aliens Vs. Predator, I am Legend, I Robot and Matrix. All of which had Black Actors who held the film together, I even think Matrix was all about Morpheus since his name means God of Dreams. In any case, to there has never really been a Black Sci-Fi film...maybe Brother from Another Planet and Sun Ra's flick, because our culture within Sci-Fi has not been represented. To avoid the stigma of being a token the answer is to make films that are Afro-Futuristic....in my opinion. Create a whole new genre...

  • Terro | August 8, 2012 5:33 AMReply

    I finished the article, and was informed and invigorated, but it's the comment section that won me over. Thank you, fellow commenters, for this great debate filled with information and enlightenment!

  • misha | August 6, 2012 12:41 AMReply

    "What about if what you call people’s projections are merely their interpretations? What if these interpretations of someone’s so-called non race specific film could be another aspect of the film that the filmmaker hadn’t considered?" >>>This! Thank you, Artbizzy! Your entire post is on point but these were the exact questions I pondered as I read the above piece. And FYI, Butler's KINDRED is my all-time favorite novel. I think it is indeed the "ultimate sci-fi on race," as dubbed below.

  • Rachel Kadushin | August 2, 2012 12:33 PMReply

    Getting around tokensim from a production and marketing level is one of the issues that I think the author of this article handles well. My personal preference is to have multiple examples that are different from each other, but often that can't be green-lighted.

    One of the very effective parts of this article was that much of the essay could substitute any kind of minority in commercial storytelling, while some of the material is very culture and experience specific.

    The third issue is the marketing of science fiction which goes in and out of favor in terms of being distributable and box office friendly.

    Personally, I also appreciated the additional Octavia Butler information.

  • artbizzy | August 2, 2012 9:09 AMReply

    What is science? What science are you talking about? Science rooted in white supremacy? Science that excludes the numerous, varied and complex vast belief systems of an entire continent of people and their descendants who were enslaved? Science that ignores other ways of viewing the world that might not be compatible to what science has “proven” to be true? What about the unconscious? What about if what you call people’s projections are merely their interpretations? What if these interpretations of someone’s so-called non race specific film could be another aspect of the film that the filmmaker hadn’t considered? And what about futurism? It’s difficult to imagine ourselves in the future? Really? Many people around the globe have a different sense of time. Time that is not linear. Time in which the past, present and future are all one. But this view doesn’t jibe with science, does it? And also what about our indoctrination with Judeo-Christian beliefs that contradict science? Our discomfort with dabbling in the odd and the strange and the visionary because of our associations with it as being evil? This is a complex subject.

    My view is this: we don’t create enough films that really do creative justice to slavery and its continual effect around the world. People may be tired of these stories because they have only viewed it in very one dimensional ways and have in turn created very basic stories of slavery. The problem isn’t the stories. The problem is in the storytelling.

  • michele | August 8, 2012 10:06 AM

    knowledge* typo

  • michele | August 8, 2012 10:05 AM

    you dropped so much knowlegde in this post IT HURTS

  • saadiyah | August 2, 2012 9:29 AM

    "The problem isn't the stories. The problem is in the storytelling." You summed it up with just those few words! Like you said this applies to more than science fiction. We (Black people and other groups) are very constricted by the Western view of the world even when we tell our stories. It's time to break out of that box.

  • MAF | August 2, 2012 8:23 AMReply

    Very interesting article. I must agree with Mr. Seewood's observation on the two strategy's of casting African Americans in Science Fiction. Event Horizon(1997) SuperNova(2000) and Deja Vu (2006) are more examples where African Americans are casted in lead roles (Laurence Fishburne in Event Horizon, Angela Bassett in Supernova and Denzel Washington in Deja Vu). Deep Blue Sea(1999) and Pitch Black (2000) are perfect examples of African Americans casted in minor roles that slowly mature in major roles.

    From both takes, race is never mentioned and shouldn't be. I believe it comes down to the studio execs and the writers. A push needs to be made to get more African American science fiction novels adapted for the screen. On the flip side I also feel that we (African Americans) shouldn't wait for hollywood to do it for us. There are plenty of great sic-fi films as Seewood mentioned that were made on shoe-string budgets. Its just a matter of doing. @ Jai, I also read Kindred. Amazing novel!

  • jeanettesdaughter | August 4, 2012 7:16 PM

    right @ MAF, and don't forget about stephen barnes. it just seems to me that if we (or when) we get in the game we can do something about the default human being as european. speculative and science fiction is a way , spectacular way to talk about the age old obsessions and propose some new encounters, too. i think it was just easier for people to deal by superimposing racial conflict than face the pregnant man idea and the interspecies sex in some of her major work.

  • Race Matters | August 2, 2012 5:55 AMReply

    "critics and viewers insist upon reading Frank J. Schaffner’s PLANET OF THE APES (1968) as a dense racial allegory ... that obscures the central scientific themes and historical source material of PLANET OF THE APES which were the 1925 Scopes trial, the concept of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, and the concept of time dilation in space travel"

    Wow! As if Darwin's theory of evolution and the resistance to the 1925 Scopes trial were not themselves embedded in racialism! Scientific racism was all about connecting black people to apes. If the author didn't intend Planet of the Apes to be a racial allegory, it's because subconsciously he may not have been aware that IT REALLY IS!

    Let's face it, black folks: from the moment slave laws determined that black skin was equated with slavery (oh, sometime in the 17th century), RACE is going to define us and our stories.

    It's because of this historic reality, why black science fiction is so necessary to escape the reality of race.

    Except there IS no escape, hence why Octavia Butler eventually had to write the ultimate sci-fi on race: KINDRED

  • Charles Judson | August 2, 2012 3:52 PM

    [Butler's KINDRED deserves it's own separate reply] While Butler definitely explored Race, I'd argue that her exploration of feminism, gender, sexuality and community dominated her books more than race did. Even KINDRED, which is more about the legacy of Slavery as informed by Race, than it is Race itself (yes I do think there is a huge categorical difference), is specifically the story of a Black Woman. Make Dana a man instead of a woman and you change huge chunks of the book. Moments like Rufus forcing Dana to help him essentially rape a woman (even though Rufus offers it as a "choice", have sex with me and get beaten or have sex with me and don't get beaten), or the irony of Dana losing her arm inside the walls of the home she shares with her White husband, would lose a lot of their meaning and critique. Imagine Rufus asking a male Dana to help him coerce a woman into an act she wouldn't want to do. Would a male Dana been as willing to believe he could influence Rufus to be less a savage as he saw Rufus grow up? The maternal qualities of her characters runs through all her books, yet that's not always raised and at times is ignored. And KINDRED is very much about the choices Black Women and a Modern Black Woman make in the past to survive. Making the book a critique of the simplistic ideas that Slavery rendered Black People either powerless with no agency, or people with power who repressed their own agency. It was always more complicated than that and in the context of 1979 when Black Feminists, White Feminists and the Civil Rights Vanguard (still mostly dominated by men and catering to men) were at an educational, economic and political crossroads, with a lot of the schisms already in play, KINDRED's themes were very much of the moment. The blow-up over THE COLOR PURPLE the book and film as being anti-Black Men is partially rooted in that conflict. A legacy of genders at constant odds and at war that is still resonating in books like Steve Harvey's ACT LIKE A LADY, THINK LIKE A MAN. There's much to be gained by expanding how we see and create these stories and to not be so doggedly adherent to the idea that Race should be the defining characteristic of how we interpret these stories. Especially when one considers KINDRED is probably a more essential book for understanding the complex influence Slavery and Sexism have on our present, and how the power dynamics of Sexism and institutions like Slavery can manifest themselves, are for Black folk, specifically those who want to lead and make policy, than it is for White folk. Making Race, while very much present and vital, one of the secondary and tertiary definitions one could or should use.

  • Charles Judson | August 2, 2012 3:26 PM

    Are there Racial implications in the novel of APES? For sure. It is ultimately about a planet of Apes who can't reconcile the idea that at one point they were the lesser beings and Human's were their superiors. That may not be strictly a take on American or Modern (for 1963) views of Race, it's still a view nonetheless. Even if the Scopes trial didn't exist, it's difficult to believe a French writer wouldn't have been aware of his own country's history of colonization when writing a book about what's essentially colonization on another planet. Especially as 3 years before the book is published 14 French colonies got their independence. However, I do think Andre's thesis that we've allowed Race to dominate the lens we view the book and lots of Science Fiction is reinforced by how some African American's saw the Scopes Trial itself and or own recollection of it. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3660880?uid=3739616&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101117222321: "A lack of broader education, Moses noted, had left black ministers 'proverbially hostile to science'...Moses hoped that the trail would demonstrate 'that Christianity is strengthened by science rather than weakened' and that the conflict would restore the confidence of 'the darker races' in Christianity." We often hear about the Racial concerns of African Americans over the Scopes Trial, but how often do people delve into the role Science was positively or negatively viewed in the community outside or independent of Race itself? Our collective interests in moments like Scopes have always been more expansive than race. That interest and internal debate continues into the present: Dialogue of Reason: Science and Faith in the Black Community: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7diwQ5dHZ0U

  • Ladybug | August 1, 2012 9:20 PMReply

    Is Blood Child a precursor to Lilith's . . .

  • Said in Los Angeles | August 1, 2012 9:02 PMReply

    Thgis article was so off based in its cited examples it was difficult to complete, and I'm not thinking its worth the time to correct the misrepresentation... Idris in Prometheus and Yaphet (sp?) in Aliens? Those were two of the examples cited as examples of racial allegory?....Uhm, no...

  • Donella | August 2, 2012 12:41 PM

    It would take ALL DAY to make corrections to this article. Don't have that kind of time. That's why... I just... "Nope!"

  • CONMENT POLICE | August 1, 2012 10:56 PM

    DONT READ HIS SHIT. NEVER WORTH IT.

  • Muse | August 1, 2012 10:29 PM

    While the article was a bit long-winded, the thesis was clear. I don't think Sewood is saying that Idris in Prometheus and Yaphet in Alien ARE portraying racially allegorical characters / tropes, he is saying that others PROJECT racial symbolism onto their performances and/or the narrative itself where none was consciously intended, simply because the characters are black. And that's a problem precisely BECAUSE it's a misrepresentation of the narrative. Going back to my other post, they were meant to simply be flowers, not Politically Charged Signifiers (tm).

  • Muse | August 1, 2012 6:08 PMReply

    This essay reminds me of two things:

    - There was a recent SA article promoting a graphic novel by Erika Alexander and her husband Tony Puryear featuring lead black characters. They had a meeting with a Hollywood exec to pitch it as a movie. The exec said: "Black people don’t like science fiction. It’s because they don’t see themselves in the future." So it's not just black film scholars perpetuating nonsense about black folks' relationships to science fiction.

    - Art critic alter ego Hennessy Youngman sums up the thesis of your essay in one of his hilarious "Art Thoughtz" videos: a picture of a flower attributed to a white male painter, with the caption "White Male Flower: a pretty ass painting of a flower. Value derived from its formal attributes." Then there's another picture of the SAME flower attributed to a black painter, with the caption "N****r Flower. Signifier for institutionalized racism and oppression. Instantaneously a critique of Power." Here is the link to the video "How to be a Successful Artist. The segment starts at 1:06. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNXL0SYJ2eU

    (Side note: I'm surprised SA hasn't yet done a profile on Youngman! He comes from an art history background rather than a film background, bringing a fresh perspective with his inventive, satirical, highly popular internet show "Art Thoughtz." It fits right into the progressive black film milieu of this site.)

  • ALM | August 1, 2012 10:00 PM

    @ Muse: It's so sad that Erika Alexander was told this. I am so tried of studio executives feeling confident that they are experts on "what Black people like and don't like". It's really, really sad and tired.

  • Muse | August 1, 2012 6:09 PM

    Why oh why doesn't SA allow paragraph breaks in the comments section lol.

  • Jai | August 1, 2012 4:32 PMReply

    I never read Bloodchild, I'll have to pic that up from the library. Kindred is my favorite!

  • Donella | August 1, 2012 12:46 PMReply

    Nope!

Follow Shadow and Act

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Caribbean Film VOD Platform STUDIO ANANSI ...
  • Muted, Black & White First Trailer for ...
  • Exclusive - Watch 1st Trailer for Nefertite ...
  • Review: Amma Asante's Brave 'Belle' ...
  • Omar Sy Takes a Dramatic-Romantic Turn ...
  • Is a Pulse-Pounding, International Espionage ...
  • 'Life After Death' (Conflicting Portrait ...
  • The 1st Movie That Made You Laugh? Steve ...
  • Boris Lojkine’s Critically-Acclaimed ...
  • 'Funk, God, Jazz, and Medicine: Black ...