Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Revisiting Spike Lee's Divisive 'Girl 6' On Its 18th Birthday

News
by Tambay A. Obenson
March 26, 2014 5:55 PM
11 Comments
  • |

March 22, 1996Spike Lee's contentious dramedy Girl 6 opened in theaters in the USA. I'm 4 days late in wishing the film a happy birthday, but who's counting, right?

I call it one of Spike's *forgotten* films - not because we don't remember it, but rather because, when discussions of Spike's film library are had, it's one of those titles that rarely gets mentioned; Whether it's because they were poorly received by audiences and/or critics, or there just wasn't as much awareness of them at the time of their initial releases, maybe due to a lack of accessibility/availability. 

Films like Do The Right ThingMalcolm XJungle FeverShe's Gotta Have It, and others are usually at the top of the list. They're also his most familiar films. Ask the average audience member what Spike Lee films they've seen, or know of, and one of these titles will probably be mentioned 9 out of 10 times - especially Do The Right Thing and Malcolm X

But Spike has about 26 feature films in his oeuvre, including TV movies, and documentaries. He's been doing this for almost 30 years now, which averages to about a film a year.

But today, in celebration of the film's 18th birthday (I can't believe it's been that long) I'm taking a trip down memory lane with Girl 6.

We could say that there are 2 kinds of Spike Lee films - those that follow a much more conventional, traditional narrative path, and those that, well, don't. Call it the "experimental" Spike Lee; Spike playing in his sandbox, with varying results.

And as I thought about Girl 6, I did wonder: if Spike Lee was a white director, and if this was a film about a white woman, would general reactions to it have been different, when it was initially released? I say that because I wonder if black filmmakers are "allowed" (and I'm being careful with my use of the word "allowed") to be "different;" to push past the expected; to be experimental (there goes that word again); not just by the mainstream, but even within our own community. Have we all become so used to a certain kind of black cinema (limited to 3 or 4 different categories, especially in the last 20 years), that when something so unlike what we've come to expect, comes along, we (everyone, not just black audiences, and of course I'm making a generalization) aren't quite sure what to make of it. We don't immediately understand it, and given how critical thinking in cinema isn't exactly embraced broadly, we aren't much interested in dissecting and closely examining those not-so easily digested films; and so we quickly dismiss them.

It's easier to do that, I suppose, especially when there is so much else fighting for your attention.

I'm much more interested in what I call investigating cinema; looking at pictures as whole, or in pieces. I think even films we consider *unworthy* aren't exempt from that kind of critical exploration.

And, as stated already, I imagine if Spike were a white director, and a film like Girl 6 were about a white woman, it may have been praised for its attempts (whether intentional or not) to disrupt the expected order of things, even if it wasn't entirely successful. Comparisons would have been made to past auteurs and styles, with critics discussing it as if it were some "neo-New Wave" construction. And its place in Spike's oeuvre would have been a little higher on the acceptability scale.

Although I think we could identify both kinds of Spike Lees in just about all his films. I wouldn't call him purely an experimental filmmaker (the word itself rather broad), like a John Akomfrah or Kevin Jerome Everson, for example; but I also wouldn't call him a filmmaker in the mold of pure storytellers of years past.

His films aren't always so perfectly and cleanly constructed around story, and they can have an unfinished quality about them, as if he's still working through each one. And I actually appreciate that when it occurs or when I make myself aware of it.

With films like Girl 6, I'd posit that Spike is being more than just a storyteller - pushing the boundaries of the familiar linear narrative style that most films follow. As I said, Spike Lee playing in his sandbox, with Girl 6 being Spike at his most playful - a film that was sandwiched between *serious* message movies in Clockers (a film that he said he hoped would seal the coffin on so-called "hood" movies), and Get On The Bus (a celebration of the diversity in black masculinity, and black unity). His 9th feature film, it marked a break from his previous 8 releases, with maybe She's Gotta Have It being its closest sibling (and not only because Girl 6 borrows from Nola Darling's opening monologue).

It was only after I watched it again recently that I considered appreciating Girl 6, not necessarily for the story it tells (or at least seems to want to tell - and what that is, may differ from one viewer to the next), but rather, appreciating it for the style in which it tells its story.

Although, given how active my mind constantly is, the more I thought about the film, the more layers I uncovered, and the more ways I was able to interpret it (for example, is it a story about addiction, as Girl 6 allows herself to be gradually consumed by what was effectively meant to be more of an aside, in becoming a phone sex operator in order to earn an income, so much that it takes a potentially fatal occurrence to give her the slap back into reality she needed to remember what her motivation was for entering that line of work in the first place, and what it was she really was pursuing).

But that's the beauty of art, isnt it? Being able to watch a film (in this case) and receive it in more than 1 or 2 ways; each time you watch it, you see something entirely different, which can be stifling for anyone who has to write about this stuff. You want to be thorough, but also succinct.

If we summed up its plot, looking at it solely at the surface, we could say that it's a lamentation on the plight of the struggling actress, or more specifically, of the struggling black actress - her hopes (as represented in fantasy sequences featuring star Theresa Randle playing some of her favorite screen characters), and her will to survive (becoming a phone sex operator in order to earn a living, while still seemingly working on her craft, even though it's not exactly an ideal situation).

But what I felt was a relatively weak 3rd act, when Spike spoils all the fun we'd been having for the previous 80 or so minutes and gets a bit too serious, trying to squeeze in a lesson or two, got in the film's way.

This could be regarded as a film more about mood and setting, than story. And that works for some (it works for me) and not others. Individual scenes are probably more remarkable (the ending kiss between Randle and co-star Isaiah Washington as her ex, with multi-colored telephones dropping seemingly from the sky, all in slow motion, immediately comes to mind, whether you think it has meaning or not), than when you think of the film as a whole.

It's like the Theresa Randle show, or rather a showcase for her abilities - a highlight reel that you may have thought would lead to even more prominent roles (and she puts in a full performance, demonstrating range); but like so many other talented black actresses who came before and after her, Hollywood apparently wasn't all that interested, even though she bared almost all, showing her breasts in the film's opening sequence - one of those memorable, seemingly iconic, if controversial cinematic moments that not only raised eyebrows, but also may have raised her industry profile (for better or worse) the way it has for other actresses. I'm thinking of Sharon Stone's flash in Basic Instinct for example, and the immediate impact that movie had on her career.

Not that I'm championing Randle's *northern exposure* in the opening scenes of Girl 6; I thought it was entirely gratuitous, and the point there could really have been made without her disrobing, not only for "QT", but for the audience as well. It's a misstep that comes very early on, which may have actually been a good thing in hindsight, because you get passed it very early, there isn't another occurrence like it, and you soon forget it (well, hopefully).

I thought of that scene for a bit, trying to make sense of it, believing that there may have been more to it than meets the eye, but kept coming back to it as nothing much more than a case of a male director saying "I can do this so I will."

But whatever motivation or message (assuming there was an intentional one) that I was supposed to get from that moment, was clouded by the image of (and my heterosexual male appreciation for) the woman's breasts.

Like She's Gotta Have It, it's interesting to observe Spike's attempts to simultaneously celebrate young, independent (and all the word suggests) black women, while also seemingly wrestling with his own heterosexual male filmmaker biases and tendencies, when it comes to depictions of women.

But get past that early "dark" moment, and then go play in the sand with Theresa and Spike for the next 100 minutes, because that's what it often felt like (toss in several winks, via cameos from the likes of Naomi Campbell wearing a "Models Suck" T-shirt, MadonnaRichard Belzer and Michael Imperioli, and a hotchpotch of sets on which Randle wonderfully acts out her fantasies - including impersonations of past roles played by Dorothy Dandridge and Pam Grier; Really, Randle shouldn't have had to audition for another film ever again in her life!!). So your appreciation for the time you spend with Girl 6 and Jimmy, will depend in just how much you like and/or care for Girl 6 and Jimmy (Spike Lee playing a similar character he's played in his other films, although more restrained here than usual, but still hilarious at times).

In addition to the She's Gotta Have It references in Girl 6, I also saw thematic similarities with another *forgotten* Spike Lee film - She Hate Me. Specifically, lead characters in both films find their livelihoods challenged, and are forced to make choices that they likely wouldn't under normal circumstances, with survival being of utmost concern for each, as both become consumed with what they likely initially believed would be temporary stints in order to earn income, however out of character; And each has their moment of realization that, where they ended up, wasn't at all part of their grand plan, leading to decisions to change for the better, as we'd like to believe.

As I said earlier, this marked a departure for Spike, up until it was released, and we could say a halfway point, when taking into consideration the 20 or so scripted feature films he's made in total for the big screen; as we wouldn't get to see "experimental Spike Lee" again for another 9 or 10 films when Red Hook Summer was released 16 years later.

Filled with familiar pieces of Spike Lee nostalgia and some of his favorite things (sports memorabilia for example), the icing on this cosmopolitan cake goes to the bold colors and warm, inviting cinematography by Malik Sayeed, as well as the wall-to-wall Prince soundtrack, comprised of both the old and the new. 

So what did you see in Girl 6?

Watch a 15-minute cut of Girl 6 below:

News
  • |

More: Spike Lee, Theresa Randle

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

11 Comments

  • Dankwa Brooks | July 14, 2014 4:30 PMReply

    I JUST finished this movie this morning and and agree for the most part of what Tambay said. About 85% of what he said.

    "We could say that there are 2 kinds of Spike Lee films - those that follow a much more conventional, traditional narrative path, and those that, well, don't. Call it the "experimental" Spike Lee; Spike playing in his sandbox, with varying results." I think as an auteur--a BLACK auteur he has to traverse both worlds. You want to serve the black audience, telling black stories, but you also don't want to pander to them either like I feel TYLER PERRY does sometimes. DO NOT get it twisted I'm a fan of Perry's work as well. There's room for Lee and Perry like there's room for MICHAEL BAY and STEVEN SPEILBERG.

    But back to this work I also agree with this 100% "It's like the Theresa Randle show, or rather a showcase for her abilities - a highlight reel that you may have thought would lead to even more prominent roles (and she puts in a full performance, demonstrating range)" I thought she was f*cking TERRIFIC! Whatever you thought about the film's story or direction you can't, you SHANT deny her performance in this. She absolutely "puts in a full performance, demonstrating range". After seeing this I too wonder why Hollywood didn't come calling. The film's poor performance shouldn't have mattered to the REAL casting people who scour theater and such for talent. Sigh.

    I enjoyed the film, mostly for Randle's performance and the filmmaking choices from Spike and cinematographer MALIK SAYEED.

    As I tweeted, this film is NOT the "train wreck" I heard it was. Far from it.

  • Tlewisisdope | March 28, 2014 10:31 AMReply

    In some ways, I think Girl 6 is Spike's bravest, strongest work. It's a beautifully pro-black woman film that people just misunderstand.

  • shl | March 29, 2014 6:00 PM

    It's okay to be drunk when you're on the computer. It's obvious you were drunk when you watched that movie.

  • Daryl | March 27, 2014 5:50 PMReply

    Tambay you are right black filmmakers are put in a box. You tell a different type of story you are dismissed. Tambay you are right on point with your observation if it was a white director this film would be looked at different, I'm going to go further it would have been a critical darling, give you example look at Mike Leigh film Naked, if this film was done by a black man I don't think it would have gotten the same critical acclaim. I also like the style and the narrative structure of this film. I thought Girl 6 was a good film when it was released, I think it is a great film now. I think this going to be one of those films that is going to get more critical acclaim in the coming years, It was ahead of it's time, just look at social networks, you see people's fantasy to be somebody else and portray somebody else that they have a hard time seperating fantasy from reality. Spike Lee was on to something with this movie, this movie was about stardom but it was a different type of stardom, the minor stardom, where people have a small number of people that like them, (examples video vixens or strippers on social networks) that fulfills their appetite to be famous or important making them into a minor celebrity It also spoke on the bleak aspects of success in hollywood for black actresses and how this job fulfill that void of Theresa Randle character somewhat of her not being able to make it in hollywood because of her skin color, she was still acting but instead of the silver screen, she was acting on the phone.

  • Bread-Free | March 27, 2014 3:12 PMReply

    You forgot to mention Girl 6 is an original screenplay by playwright Suzan-Lori Parks. She like Spike is a black creative uninterested in the communal black unease. On how black artists should govern their impulses when operating outside of acceptability - accessibility - and expectation.

  • Donella | March 27, 2014 12:11 PMReply

    Hey. You forgot School Daze. ;-)

  • urbanauteur | March 27, 2014 10:01 AMReply

    Girl 6 in my opinion was spike's homage to Frederico Fellini..even though its effort was 1/2 ass, why not go ALL THE WAT, that's whats frustrating with this guy, same thing with his original script/concept for his movie [school daze], from what i read about that movie, it had all the makings of Bernardo Bertolucci's movie "1900". What? if he gonna translate or pay homage then go there,baby!...

    Examples here:Werner Herzog-Lars Von Trier-even Harmony Korine & Takashi Miike

  • m o o n marked | March 27, 2014 9:36 AMReply

    here's where the idea of Director as author of film falls a bit—well, a lot—short for me. Girl 6 is the first film directed by Lee in which he did not write the screenplay; the screenplay was written by experimental playwright Suzan-Lori Parks. Any discussion about structure and theme has to include—if not begin—with an examination of the screenplay as well as Lee's directorial decisions.

  • Derek | March 26, 2014 6:32 PMReply

    I think Girl 6 is one of Spike Lee's most misunderstood films. I'm not saying it's successful, but like with all of Spike's Joints you can't just totally dismiss it. In Girl 6, Spike's commentary is centered around "roles." I think he later revisits some of these same thoughts in Bamboozled with a clearer screenplay, but both are very interested in the roles that people of color find themselves quartered into both on screen (or on the phone in Girl 6's case) and in the real world. The subplot about the real life black girl who fell down the elevator shaft without much media fanfare parallels Girl 6's own story. Both are forgotten.

  • ALP | March 26, 2014 7:04 PM

    dude, they are ALL misunderstood, thats spike

  • disgruntled employee | March 26, 2014 6:09 PMReply

    "Like She's Gotta Have It, it's interesting to observe Spike's attempts to simultaneously celebrate young, independent (and all the word suggests) black women, while also seemingly wrestling with his own heterosexual male filmmaker biases and tendencies, when it comes to depictions of women."

    Are you kidding? "Interesting to observe"?? It's one half of his personality. (the other half being bad communication skill)

Follow Shadow and Act

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Now Taking Your Questions for S&A Column ...
  • "Many Documentary Films Have Been Shot ...
  • 2014 IFP Project Forum Slate Includes ...
  • Ahead of 'Finding Fela's' Release, Watch ...
  • Tessa ThompsonInterview: Tessa Thompson Talks Emotionally ...
  • TV One Gets Into Original Movies. Will ...
  • Shemar Moore is Returning to 'The Young ...
  • A Trip Down Memory Lane w/ 1970s Actress ...
  • Regina King Joins 'American Crime' Cast, ...
  • Watch Craig Robinson in First Trailer ...