The Curious Case Of Shermika Moffitt

Features
by Tanya Steele
October 24, 2012 1:34 PM
24 Comments
  • |

Mohamed Bouazizi will, one day, be known throughout the world as a Hero. He sparked the 'Arab Spring'. A street vendor, tired of being harassed and humiliated by an "official", set himself on fire to protest the injustice he and his fellow citizens were experiencing. If only he were alive to see that he changed the world.

Shermika Moffitt, age 20, has also caught our attention. Initially, it was reported that she was set on fire by three men. 'KKK' and 'Nigger' were written on the hood of her vehicle. And, she is in critical condition with burns over 60% of her body.

Yesterday, the story changed. Authorities are reporting that Ms. Moffitt "set herself on fire". The evidence of this? They found, "only her fingertips" on the tube of toothpaste that wrote the letters "KKK" and "Nigger". The only fact that remains the same of these two stories is that she is in critical condition and she has burns over 60% of her body.

As I prepare myself for a very significant stage of development for my first feature film, I am trying to stop myself from hopping on a plane to learn more about Ms. Moffitt. I want to hear and share her story, her family's story. As an Artist, self-expression is what I do, some would say, to survive. I would argue against that and say it is simply who I am. I speak up. My family created that possibility for me. But, I recognize that that is not the case for many women (in the world).

Whenever someone commits an act of violence (assuming that Ms. Moffitt set herself aflame. It's highly likely that perpetrators could have held a gun to her head and forced her to take all of these actions), I always wonder, what was the last movie or TV show they watched? Obviously, I'd be most interested in their 'image' diet. But, I am always curious about the last thing they watched. And, in Ms. Moffitt's case, I wonder, what was the last movie or TV show she saw that centered around a black female? Was it the 'Steel Magnolia' remake? Was it 'Beasts of the Southern Wild'? Was it 'Middle of Nowhere'? Did she watch a music video? It's an odd curiosity of mine. What did it feel like, for her, to be a black woman in America?

How are we seen? How do we see ourselves? The actions of Mohamed Bouazizi were, clearly, a cry to end injustice. Can we make the same case for Shermika Moffitt? Or, will she be painted as a mentally ill woman who tricked all of us into buying her madness? Will she become a target for outrage? Her actions were very specific. It was as if her inner dialogue reached the surface. An act of self-immolation for a Tunisian male was a cry to end injustice. An act of self-immolation by a black american woman appears to be an implosion. The dialogue that exists in the culture. The extreme hatred that is being leveled at our first Black President. The coded language, the racism. These things have consequences. And, although many of us write about it and rail about it, most people are ingesting a steady stream of it without an outlet.

Perhaps, this was Ms. Moffitt's cry to end the agonizing, coded racist chatter. Perhaps, it was her trying to quiet the noise, get relief from the cloud hanging over America that is dripping racism on all of us, daily, as we march toward Election day. Perhaps, she was confronting demons that swirl around her state of Louisiana; the marginalization, the poverty, the hopelessness, the statistical reality of her life that is imperiled by race.

I remember walking around Zucotti Park when 'Occupy Wall Street' had just begun. My friend and I were walking around wondering if it would stick, if it would last and make a difference. We wondered if these activists would invite the plight of being in black skin, in America, into their rallying cry. And, my friend, referencing Bouazizi said, "will we have to start setting fire to ourselves in order to be heard in this country?"

As a filmmaker, I tend to look for the hero story in the underdogs, in the marginalized. And, no, I am not ready to lay that label on Ms. Moffitt. But, I do want us to look at her experience with a nuanced eye. Not a judgmental, finger waving eye that the media may place on her. It takes a lot of pain to bring a human being to the point of self-immolation. And, I can say, Ms. Moffitt had more than enough disregard to choose from. Since Whitney Houston's death, I think of Black women often. I wonder how we're doing, if we are getting what we need to be kind to ourselves. I wonder if our relationships (romantic, friendships and familial) have love and support at the center. I wonder if media, on a larger scale, will ever portray us as complete, unencumbered women.

I can't wait for Election Day. I will be voting, again, for the man that, openly, loves his black wife. Honestly, it's the only media representation we have of that model. And, yes, I support him for more than that. He gets it. Most of his significant policies benefit women. But, most people miss that because it's in the details. 'The Affordable Healthcare Act', 'The Lilly Ledbetter Act', my President is a Feminist. And, he understands that women suffer in ways that go unnoticed. He's throwing out lifelines to make our lives a little easier.

Shermika Moffitt will not go down in history as a Martyr. She will not be labeled a Hero. She will not even have her story parsed out in a fair and balanced way. That can be said for most stories written about Black women in America. But, you know, we have Toni Morrison to help us understand who and why we are. Ms. Morrison wrote "No one ever talks about the moment you found that you were white. Or the moment you found out you were black. That's a profound revelation. The minute you find that out, something happens. You have to renegotiate everything."

Ms Moffitt, may you, finally, receive the understanding and compassion that you cried out for, no matter what happened, on that Sunday night, in the wilderness of America.

Follow Tanya Steele on Twitter at @digtanya. Or on my facebook at https://www.facebook.com/tanya.steeleOr visit digtanya.com.

Features
  • |
You might also like:

24 Comments

  • starry118 | October 29, 2012 11:17 PMReply

    I enjoyed reading this piece Tanya. To use CareyCarey's words: I get it. I've had similar thoughts about where we are, who we are, and the way the world is. Thank you for sharing your perspective.

  • Welp | October 30, 2012 4:13 AM

    And since you're always looking for horseshit...

  • CareyCarey | October 30, 2012 2:46 AM

    Thank you Starry118. That's the most important point about this post or any post, is that YOU get it - whatever that may be. If a person reads this article or any of Tanya articles with a preconceived prejudice, it's highly possible that they will miss "it". It's impossible to frown and smile at the same time... if you know what I mean. On a related note, I continued to ask Charles to identify and/or name the "doggedly singular focuses" and "the few go to TOPICS" he accused her of using in most of her pieces? Yet, he failed or refused to do so. And thus, again "I have always believed a person gets what they are looking for". And Starry118, YOU GOT IT. Thanks again.

  • treasurex | October 29, 2012 1:01 PMReply

    i dont believe that she set herself on fire and here's why. i dont think the world and media want a race war and who in the right mind would do such a horrific thing to themself. they want us to believe she would do this to herself just so she can frame the kkk. none of this make sense to me but,,, not wanting the truth out there does make sense .maybe the only reason her finger prints are on the tooth paste is because its herz and because can u say they wripe theres OFF.

  • phill | October 31, 2012 2:10 PM

    Has it ever dawned on you that she just f**kin crazy? Black people suffer from mental illness just like whites.

  • AI | October 31, 2012 11:59 AM

    While I admire people's capacity to question authority, in some ways, I feel that line of questioning denies an element of her humanity. It's very possible, with the stresses of being a Black woman, that she could have suffered mentally. And as we all know, sometimes that manifests in self-destructive behavior. Even her family admitted that the KKK story was fabricated. Acknowledging that this is not the story we thought it was in no way undermines the various struggles that we as a people go through or the moral ground we stand on because of it. Nor does it keep us from inquiring and exploring the intricacies and intersections of racism and self-image that may have led her to act in the way she allegedly did.

  • B | October 30, 2012 11:41 PM

    I agree with you 100%! I'm so surprised that everyone seems to so readily accept the police's version of the events. Even if she came out and said she did it, I wouldn't necessarily believe it because coercion and fear are powerful things in the small-town South.

  • Jay | October 27, 2012 10:42 PMReply

    There are factual inaccuraticies over all of the details you posted, even the ones you places it quotes. They didn't find her "fingertips" on the toothpaste, that doesn't even make sense. They found "only Her fingerprints at the scene, on a lighter and charcoal fluid used to start the fire". They never even stated they found her prints on the toothpaste, only they felt she used it to write the letters "KKK" and the N word. I do agree that this doesn't mean she lied or set herself on fire because as you stated someone could have forced her to do it. She never stated this but I'm sure more facts will come out, no matter what happens this poor woman needs to heal and recover. I just wanted to correct the horribly wrong statements you quoted in the blog.

  • Carey | October 25, 2012 7:21 PMReply

    Hello Tanya, I get it, I got it and I believe I get you. Having read all of your posts, I would define them as "The Inquisitive World of Tanya Steele". This post, in particular, highlights how and why I've come to that conclusion. Charles Judson defined this post as "artistic navel gazing". Although I don't quite understands what he means by that, when I find myself picking lent from, and aimlessly gazing at my navel, I tend to get lost in various thoughts. Many pass by and are unrelated to my original reason for finding my "inny" that once was an "outty", but there I sit. Now, having read this post multiple times, I will agree with Charles, in that, it's not necessarily about "Shermika Moffitt". It's more like a stream of conscious thought, being shared through the perspective of a black female writer. In fact, you said: "self-expression is what I do... it is simply who I am." And throughout your piece it was filled with the questioning words... "How are we seen? How do we see ourselves?"... "I want to hear"... "I wonder if media"... "I wonder if our relationships"... "I wonder how we're doing"... "We wondered if these activists"... "What did it feel like"... "Perhaps, this was Ms. Moffitt's cry".. "It's an odd CURIOUSITY of mine". All of those questions ran through your mind and you shared them with us, hence-->"The Inquisitive World of Tanya Steele". Where I disagree with Charles is when he suggested what you could have done with this post. Because, in essence, I believe you did what you set out to do, that is, express your many thoughts on paper and inspire thought. Many of which could have inspired conversations all their own. Granted, "depression" might have been a part of the story, but I don't believe "motive" nor "blame" was the gist of this piece. In short, you're a writer who happens to be a black woman. The good ones, the good writers have a never ending thirst for knowledge and the truth. And your curiosity both enslaves you and sets you free. Your words: "I speak up. My family created that possibility for me. But, I recognize that that is not the case for many women (in the world)". Yes Tanya, I get it, I got this, and I believe I understand you. And, this was another good read.

  • Akimbo | October 27, 2012 11:33 AM

    Thank you, Charles for verbalizing these sentiments. I felt that this article projected so much onto Shermika. For all we know her "the KKK did it" is little more than her version of "some black/Mexican guy did it." Sometimes people do things that have absolutely very little to do with their gender, ethnicity, or the representations of either in the media, and more to do with issues very specific to who they are as a person and their personal lives. I don't think she should be viewed as a case study on the overburdened black woman when, at her age, it's more likely that she's experiencing the onset of some type of mental illness. We can talk about why women always seem to be behind these large-scale hoaxes, but to try to make it a "black woman" thing and to try to rope movies into it feels disingenuous and like a huge reach.

  • Charles Judson | October 27, 2012 10:39 AM

    My point is I'm not sure how much ANY of us can draw conclusions about Shermika Moffitt. A woman we only know from pictures and a few articles. It's easy to connect her Blackness with the KKK and the word Nigger. American history, America's present (*cough* Sunnunu, *cough* Voter I.D. Laws), and the legacy of the South, makes those connections tangible and real. However, without more information, it's a logical fallacy to assume that because she's Black and she allegedly wrote those words herself, that they hint at some deeper racial animosity that's eating way at her. Just as it's a fallacy to assume that as a Black woman this event has a "universality" that's rooted more in her Blackness than her family situation or her genetics or just her situation. I know it sounds like I'm splitting hairs. You're thinking, well duh, everyone's home life is different. Yes, but knowing that and putting that in practice are two very different things. When I mentored 10-year-olds in college, the first thing I did was go in blind. I didn't read what they gave me. I got as far as they're poor and they're grades are low and that's only because that was the criteria of the program. Those kids will tell me who they are, what they care about. These were young Black boys who were going to grow up to be young Black men and I was determined to treat them like the masters of their own destinies they already were. They already have a sense of self. I felt my job was to help them realize that, nothing more. My job wasn't to save them, beyond being poor and some bad grades, some of those kids didn't even need saving. They were just kids. They'll define who they want to be. I sincerely believe we (especially as storytellers) should be the first people to not draw conclusions. And the first question we should ask is not "Why?" or tell me "What's it like to be a Black woman (or man)?" or "What is it like to be Black in America?" but "Who are you?"

  • CareyCarey | October 27, 2012 4:24 AM

    "I wouldn't likely have much of a concern if Tanya wasn't so doggedly singular in what she focuses on... she's got a few go to topics"... "quite a number of Tanya's posts are all filtered through the same lenses" by Charles Judson. Now Charles, we've been doing this long enough for me to feel comfortable in saying... Damn man, spit it out *lol*. Seriously Charles, I know you work hard at being a polite gentleman, but please say what you're not saying. As it stands, your words are too ambiguous and leaves mess on the floor. See, I've read every one of Tanya's posts. From Whitney Houston (which included the subject of drug addiction), President Obama (which included Health Care Reform), Trayvon Martin, An Open Letter to Viola Davis, Notes From The Screenwriting Desk and her thoughts on Scandal, I've read them all, so please please please open the door... and LET IT OUT :-). It's not nice nor fair to leave those seemingly "negative" connotations on the floor. In the interim: Much of your comment centered on depression. You also said you were taken aback by the issues Tanya connected to Sharmika. Are you suggesting that this post would have had more richness or significance if she would have focused - more - on the history and psychological development of Ms, Moffitt? You shared the story of the mother who killed several of her children, the details of her coverage and the lack of empathy she received, so I am slightly confused at what you're looking for and/or what you believe is missing from this post? As I said in an earlier comment, a person "gets" what they are looking. And, there's only so much (details, background, information) one can add to a blog post while maintaining the interest of the readers. @ Tanya, I really appreciate you coming back to address our concerns. I've said the same to Curtis John who also takes the time to engage his readers; letting them know he is "with" them. As you said, and I'll mimic your words "The fact that people take a moment to share their thoughts, means a lot. [it helps] keep conversation flowing on 'Shadow and Act', it's a valuable resource!" Thanks again.

  • Charles Judson | October 26, 2012 10:13 AM

    "We must be vigilant that we don't commit the same sin of robbing others of their individuality, at the service of our own interests both on an individual and a community level." It's not that Tanya connected Shermika to other issues, it's what issues she connected her with. Listen, I wouldn't likely have much of a concern if Tanya wasn't so doggedly singular in what she focuses on. However, I've read enough posts of hers to know she's got a few go to topics. Which is fine. Yet, don't be surprised that folks like me bristle when that lens is used so widely. Remember a few years ago there was the mother that killed several of her children. She had suffered various forms of depression over the years. Even after it had been explained how postpartum depression and psychosis played a role, even after it had been explained how often she had been treated. People still either thought this woman was pure evil or that pure love and decency should have given her the strength to wrestle control over her condition. Now, if they aren't going to give this white woman a pass, if they aren't going to listen to the facts, if they aren't going budge just an inch to demonstrate an ounce of empathy, what the hell you think folks are going to make of a 20-year-old black woman from the South with tattoos? If we don't fight to make sure Shermika is seen as an individual and not just an example of black whining and manipulation that the conservative right can point to, who will? By extension, if we aren't doing that there, what are we doing in the films we make? We write? We produce? Fast forward 15 years. Someone makes a film about Shermika? Does she become a troubled young woman who we learn to empathize with and still root for? Or does she become lost among a sea of messages and polemics? What about all the other Shermikas? Real and fictional. I don't see this as a moot issue at all. In fact, this right here, encompasses so much of the tension that drives the discussions on Shadow and Act and the Black Filmmaking Community at large.

  • tanya steele | October 26, 2012 9:49 AM

    Carey Carey and Carey, I appreciate your words, always. I appreciate the thoughtfulness you bring to your comments. I read all comments posted. And, honestly, I appreciate ALL of you. The fact that people take a moment to share their thoughts, means a lot. Let's keep conversation flowing on 'Shadow and Act', it's a valuable resource!

    @Charles, I can't say that I, fully, understand your comment. However, I will say, I would love to ask Ms. Moffitt the very question of what films she watches. I would allow that conversation to take us through what it feels like to be a black woman in America. When men talk about women and depression, as you have done, I get a bit nervous. It feels like you are trying to take her "depression" out of the universality of her experience. Black women and men are global citizens. Our lives intersect and are as worthy of political, existential and emotional investigation as anyone else's. Why should our acts be limited to 'the black woman was depressed and a mother" line? Ms. Moffit's life and actions are important to investigate within a context, similar to Mr. Bouazizi. Her actions were complex. If she, in fact, set fire to herself, the fact that she wrote the words 'KKK' and 'Nigger' hints that she was thinking or feeling the weight of cultural dynamics. White women who, for example, kill their children, get reams of paper written about them. Ms. Moffitt's acts deserve a bit of attention on that scale. But, America will not give us that. So, we dialogue where we can. Thanks for your thoughts.

  • CareyCarey | October 26, 2012 12:31 AM

    Okay Charles, lets see if we agree. Did Tanya "use" Shermika Moffitt? Yes, I believe one could say that. Is this more of an op-ed than an artistic expression or a simple thought piece? Yes, one could come to that conclusion. Did I infer that Tanya, if she had the opportunity, was actually considering asking the questions on what films Shermika had recently watched? No, not at all. I understood that she - in that segment of the piece - was merely sharing a form of her curiosity. Therefore, in my opinion, it's a moot issue . Consequently, it boils down to whether or not I find this piece "troubling" because it included Shermika Moffit along with other "issues" (i.e, any political, socio-economic or cultural rhetoric that suits the writer in question)? Well, I have to say not at all. I believe, for me, it served it's purpose, which obviously depends entirely on each reader's interpretation. I have always believed a person gets what they are looking for. And, I don't quite understand how this fits the conversation--> " how do I be black and an individual". And, it's been over 15 years since I've last read Souls of Black Folks.

  • Charles Judson | October 25, 2012 10:50 PM

    I'm all for Tanya sharing her thoughts. I'm all for curiosity. However, quite a number of Tanya's posts are all filtered through the same lenses. As an artist, there's nothing wrong with that when you're creating art. However that approach will not have the same impact and implications when you're writing what's more akin to an op-ed than a personal essay or a simple thought piece. Even then, you're still working in a space in which your words have resonance. Let's put it this way. If Tanya went to Sharmika today and asked her did you see the STEEL MAGNOLIA remake? Did you see MIDDLE OF NOWHERE? How exactly does that make you feel? How do you think that would make Sharmika feel? Her family? Her friends? What if you were watching a documentary and those were the questions included? Would you not recoil a bit? I'm not saying that Tanya would be that insensitive. But there are shades of that in this piece. The use of Mohamed Bouazizi to filter what appears to be a personal struggle through an event that was overtly political, and a true national struggle that's not abstract by any definition, I find troubling. I sincerely believe Tanya is not be trying to make Sharmika into a cipher to be filled with any political, socio-economic or cultural rhetoric that suites the writer in question, however that's essentially what she's done. One of the great questions of the 21st century is how do I be black and an individual? It's a question we wrestle with internally amongst ourselves, but it's also a challenge thrown at us by folks who argue that they "only see themselves as American," not x-American. We must be vigilant that we don't commit the same sin of robbing others of their individuality, at the service of our own interests both on an individual and a community level. It's an extension of W.E.B. Dubious thoughts in SOULS OF BLACK FOLK that are even more nuanced and difficult to parse now in 2012 than in 1903.

  • Akimbo | October 24, 2012 7:10 PMReply

    Listen, any time a "perpetrator" leaves behind a signature/name or seems to deliver a heavy-handed message, you have to be skeptical. We've seen this with the girl who carved a backwards B in her face, the woman who spray-painted her walls and staged a homophobic hate crime, and the woman who threw acid in her own face. Most criminals don't leave literal calling cards; they don't want to get caught. I hope this young woman gets the help she needs; these fake attacks and kidnappings cross all ethnic lines.

  • lauren | October 24, 2012 6:05 PMReply

    Sad and interesting, because when I first read about it for some reason the Tawana Brawley fabrication came to mind... So tragic that mental illness is too often suffered in silence.

  • Charles Judson | October 24, 2012 3:56 PMReply

    "What did it feel like, for her, to be a black woman in America?" Instead of worrying about her Media diet, I would more ponder the likely possibility that as a 20-year-old she's at the age various forms of depression begin to appear or ramp up. I haven't seen it clarified that she's also a mother, but if she is, untreated depression at her age, combined with a baby is often a disastrous recipe. Especially in the South and the Black Community. Both in which depression is seen as as sign of weakness than something that can be treated, and the "baby blues" is still seen as a minor road bump that many believe (erroneously) all mothers go through. If there is injustice, it's likely in the blindness we exhibit to this and its impact. I applaud your wanting to dissect this issue, but I'll bluntly have to say this reads more like artistic navel gazing filtered through the limited lenses of race, politics and media and not a carefully thought out examination of Moffitt's own life, mental health, and the broader implications for black women. Two important statistics. Twelve percent of women will suffer clinical depression at some point in their life. Suicide is the third leading cause of death among those 15-24. If you scroll down to the bottom of this page you'll see a map that shows a disturbing concentration of depression in the South: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5938a2.htm Does the focus on mental health render all the other pressures of being a 20-year-old black woman in the South moot? No. However, if we're going to analyze the media, if we're going to bring them in, we'd be better off targeting how depression is covered for folks of color, especially for black women. For whom, just take being black out of the equation, are already twice as likely to suffer from depression as men. More importantly, this might be the story of a woman in crisis who showed all the symptoms and could have been helped. Yet, if we focus on the racial implications, we miss the chance to educate black families on the importance of understanding, recognizing and treating depression and other mental illnesses, to instead lay blame at the feet of problems that exist, but could have played only a partial, maybe even non-existent, role.

  • Winston | October 24, 2012 3:40 PMReply

    Hero? What are you talking about? The police are going where the evidence is pointing them, and you want to do all that you can to dispute it. Maybe she did what they said she did. Where's YOUR evidence?

  • GT | October 24, 2012 5:10 PM

    Winston, please read the post again. Slowly, thoroughly...

  • Donella | October 24, 2012 2:48 PMReply

    Could the perpetrators have worn gloves, then pressed her fingers onto the toothpaste tube?

  • AshleyP | October 24, 2012 4:30 PM

    Did she FIRST report that she was forced to touch/hold these items? Was she conscious the entire time? That would be a big part of her story that may have been left out. Who knows, this entire story is odd.

  • tracy | October 24, 2012 1:54 PMReply

    In a strange coincidence, the anniversary of Kathy Change's self-immolation was Oct 22nd:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathy_Change

Follow Shadow and Act

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Cannes 2013 - ADFF Announces 1st Recipients ...
  • Cannes 2013 - Morgan Freeman, Diane ...
  • Egypt's Ismailia International Film ...
  • Cannes 2013 - South Africa & Kenya Film ...
  • Sequel To South African Sports Doc 'Streetkids ...
  • First Look Clips At Forest Whitaker ...
  • Watch New Full Trailer For Trinidadian-Made ...
  • City Life Film Project Initiative Aims ...
  • Film Africa (London's Largest African ...
  • Weekend B.O. May 17-19 (What's A Di ...