Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

The Hughes Brothers Batman Movie w/ Clint Eastwood That Was Never Made (Did You Know?)

News
by Tambay A. Obenson
July 2, 2014 3:02 PM
8 Comments
  • |

While we wait eagerly to find out what the Hughes Brothers (Albert and Allen) are each going to do next (whether individually, or together)…

Did you know that, before Chris Nolan rebooted the Batman franchise, the brothers were offered the opportunity to adapt Frank Miller’s comic-noir classic "The Dark Knight Returns"?

The kicker? They wanted Clint Eastwood to play Bruce Wayne! Imagine that – Dirty Harry in a Batman suit.

No surprise that studio executives didn’t immediately take to the idea, and the project was eventually shelved!

I think I actually would've liked to see what they had in mind, because, quite frankly, it couldn’t have been any worse than the piece of sh*t that was Joel Schumacher’s "Batman And Robin" in 1997, which starred George Clooney as the caped crusader.

The age thing comes into question, when one considers Eastwood in the role. "The Dark Knight Returns," which I haven’t read, is said to tell the story of Bruce Wayne, who at 55 years old, returns from retirement to fight crime and faces opposition from the Gotham City police force and the United States government. Eastwood still would have been a little old for the role. He's 84 years old this year; though I’m not sure when the above idea was being kicked around. Obviously it was before Nolan’s first crack at the franchise, which happened in 2005. So this would've all taken place probably some time between their most recent film at the time, "From Hell" (released in 2001) and 2005, making Clint about 70 years old then! A 70-year-old Battie, played by the squinty-eyed Eastwood, a grumpy old curmudgeon like the character he played in "Gran Torino"?

Sure, why not? I would've entertained that idea. I can imagine an aging, tough, devil-may-care Batman, reluctantly coming out of retirement to clean up the streets of Gotham. Clint certainly has shown that he has the temperament; he certainly has the height, and the build, somewhat. Plus, the scowl… and more; directed by the Hughes Brothers, who would've brought their indie-minded gritty style to the project.

I’d have been curious to see that.

You?

Over at the Complex magazine website, you'll find a list of 7 movies the Hughes Brothers almost made before "Book of Eli," including the above project, as well as "Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides," "Lone Ranger" and more. See the full list here.

News
  • |

More: Alan Hughes, Albert Hughes, Did You Know?

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

8 Comments

  • Batman Voice | July 6, 2014 2:35 AMReply

    What does my voice sound like in a freaking comic book.

  • afronerd | July 4, 2014 4:48 AMReply

    Eastwood could still play Batman if the suits decided to start a whole different alternative Batman franchise with Batman Beyond. This would not conflict with the new interpretation if they are considering Affleck for the next franchise. In Batman Beyond, Eastwood would actually be age appropriate as an aged Batman mentoring futuristic protege. Perfect!

  • Marie | July 3, 2014 2:20 PMReply

    I don't think Eastwood has the acting ability, physique nor voice to be Batman. With all due respect to the Hugheses, it's a poor choice.

  • troublemaker | July 2, 2014 9:25 PMReply

    I don't think Clint Eastwood would have made a great Batman because of the obvious that Clint at 70 looked too old. Also, Batman's voice is crucial when he's in the Batman suit. I don't think Clint's voice would be too convincing as Batman because of his voice being so recognized as the voice of Dirty Harry. It would be Dirty Harry in a Batman suit!

  • RANDOM COMMENTARY | July 2, 2014 5:58 PMReply

    This is great and all and it would have been better if you commented on this FOUR YEARS AGO.

  • Kevin | July 2, 2014 3:47 PMReply

    I know Zack Snyder is doing the Batman vs Superman film now, but I would have LOVED to seen him adapt The Dark Knight Returns with Clint Eastwood. He's been wanting to do a direct adaptation of that comic for many years now (which he's been vocal about in the past), and having Clint play Bruce would have been incredible.

  • Alan | July 2, 2014 3:17 PMReply

    What is your source for Batman's age in "Dark Knight Returns" being 55? He looked older than that in the book, to me. In any case, Clint would have done a bang-up job. Stuntmen would have done the heavy lifting, but Clint has the gravitas to pull off DKR Batman. I would have loved to have seen it.

  • alex | July 2, 2014 8:28 PM

    Its a known fact that bruce is 55 years old in TDKR. I cant believe you just asked that question. Thats insane

Follow Shadow and Act

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Now Taking Your Questions for S&A Column ...
  • "Many Documentary Films Have Been Shot ...
  • 2014 IFP Project Forum Slate Includes ...
  • Apparently The Fat Lady Hasn't Sung ...
  • Ahead of 'Finding Fela's' Release, Watch ...
  • Watch the First Full Trailer for Justin ...
  • Nick Cannon Is Teaming Up w/ Syfy to ...
  • Third 'Best Man' Movie Gets a Title, ...
  • Tessa ThompsonInterview: Tessa Thompson Talks Emotionally ...
  • Watch Spike Lee Unravel His Slave Ancestry ...