Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Tina Gordon Chism's 'We The Peeples' Gets A New Title + First Look Photo

News
by Tambay A. Obenson
February 19, 2013 10:40 AM
6 Comments
  • |

It looks like the marketing machine has began spinning for Tina Gordon Chism's We The Peeples, which stars Craig RobinsonDavid Alan GrierKerry WashingtonS. Epatha Merkerson, Melvin Van PeeblesDiahann Carroll, and Kali Hawk.

Finally, we'll get to see this, after more than 2 years since we first reported in on the old S&A site. We thought it would be released in 2012, but Lionsgate, in late 2011, announced that the film wouldn't be released until March 29th2013, which took all of us by surprise. 

About 4 months after that announcement, it was pushed back to another 2 months to May 10, 2013, which is where it currently stands. Let's hope Lionsgate doesn't change the release date again.

Produced by Tyler Perry, Stephanie Allain (also director of the Los Angeles Film Festival) and Paul Hall, the film centers on Robinson's character, a young man enduring the weekend from hell when he surprises his girlfriend by showing up to meet her parents.

The full synopsis for We The Peeples reads:

Wade Walker is eager to propose to his girlfriend, Grace Peeples. But after a year of living together, the beautiful, successful Grace is still cagey about introducing average guy Wade to her ambitious, upper crust family. So when Grace leaves for an annual reunion at her parents’ swanky Sag Harbor compound, Wade decides to crash the gathering, charm his soon-to-be in-laws and slip a ring on Grace’s finger. However Wade's plans go hilariously awry when he meets the high-powered, seemingly picture-perfect family who’ll do whatever it takes to keep up appearances. Wade soon finds himself caught in a web of white lies and comic dysfunction, and realizes that his only hope of ever marrying Grace means a take-no-prisoners face-off with Judge Peeples, Grace’s disapproving dad who won’t accept anything less than the very best for his favorite daughter.

Somewhat similar class struggles we saw in Jumping the Broom.

Chism, who both wrote and directed the film, makes her feature directorial debut with this movie, although it now looks like Lionsgate will be releasing it with a new title.

Previously titled Tyler Perry Presents We The Peeples, it'll now be called Tyler Perry Presents Peeples.

I really loathe this kind of branding. I suppose the hope is that with Perry's name in the title, the film will attract Perry's base, in addition to those who probably would have seen it anyway (who aren't in Perry's base), because they are drawn to the story and cast.

Although Perry's branding could in fact turn audiences away, because, even if the film is completely unlike anything Tyler Perry's ever done, his name in the title could suggest to audiences that it's a film very much of Perry's style and substance.

They see the title with his name on it, and assume that it's a Tyler Perry film, even though it's not, and Chism's name (as well as those of the other 2 producers, and what they bring to the project) will get buried.

But with May not-so far away, we should see a first trailer for the film very soon.

All we have at the moment is the newly-released photo above, courtesy of EW.

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

6 Comments

  • urbanauteur | February 19, 2013 4:07 PMReply

    This movie sounds like a "perverted/comedic/adaptation" of Steven l Carter's "The Emperor of Ocean Park" meet's Nathan Hare's "The Black Anglo-Saxons" with a twist of Colson Whitehead's "Sag Harbor"...imho

  • Donella | February 19, 2013 11:43 AMReply

    Tyler Perry's brand was a plus to movie sales until he tarnished his brand.

  • Nadell | February 19, 2013 11:30 AMReply

    Will Perry stop 'presenting' er'thang? Sheesh! While I do understand stamping his name is some sort of a seal and it grows his base and makes folks aware of the Perry brand and thus garners a greater crowd and one that would not be so inclined if Perry were not attached - but it is becoming soo....I thought the title initially was fine - now it just seems ill-fitted.
    But he is proud of his ownership and he has every right to be.
    I think folks will want to see this film regardless of a name attachment...

  • Troy | February 20, 2013 12:29 AM

    I have an interest in the talent but come on. Guess Who's Not Supposed to be Coming to Dinner? Daddy issues.

  • ALM | February 19, 2013 11:02 AMReply

    I actually like the original movie title better. I also agree with you on the fact that Chism's contribution is being overshadowed by the phrasing of the title. They really lucked out. Kerry Washington's star status has grown exponentially since they shot this movie. Her leading roles can only help the momentum of this film.

  • saadiyah | February 19, 2013 6:27 PM

    I am only contemplating seeing this because I am in LOVE with Kerry Washington. Right now I'd go see anything she's in! However having Tyler Perry attached to it in any way, shape, or form is a turn off for me. I'll have to wait to see some previews of the movie.

Follow Shadow and Act

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Now Taking Your Questions for S&A Column ...
  • "Many Documentary Films Have Been Shot ...
  • 2014 IFP Project Forum Slate Includes ...
  • Ahead of 'Finding Fela's' Release, Watch ...
  • Third 'Best Man' Movie Gets a Title, ...
  • Tessa ThompsonInterview: Tessa Thompson Talks Emotionally ...
  • TV One Gets Into Original Movies. Will ...
  • Shemar Moore is Returning to 'The Young ...
  • A Trip Down Memory Lane w/ 1970s Actress ...
  • Regina King Joins 'American Crime' Cast, ...