- By Christopher Campbell
- |
- February 16, 2012
It’s very hard not to like “Undefeated,” the underdog sports film that is currently also considered the underdog among the 2012 Oscar nominees in the feature documentary category. I’m not exactly sure why it’s thought to be a long shot, though, since it is a gorgeously shot, expertly edited and very accessible movie with a familiar narrative and appealing characters. Also it’s got distributor backing from Harvey Weinstein (not that he’s ever bagged an Oscar for a doc before, as far as I can recall). Is it the crowd-pleasing quality that has people thinking it’s not serious enough to win? Or, is it truly a dark horse because it deserves to be, since it’s not anywhere near as significant an achievement in nonfiction filmmaking as the other four contenders?
Recent Comments
Jamie Babbit who played Julia is a successful director--"But I'm a Cheerleader" and
the dark knight
When the Day Breaks was not a Hungarian production, it is Canadian... and by two animators who are
The funniest thing is that satire seems to be something that teenage girls (judging by most of the
What is the picture at the very top movie called
And that`s why he asked Goodwin if she believes that it exists better version of herself somewhere
Agree is over rated. There were some fantastic docs this year and it would be hard to argue that
"The Town" with Jeremy Renner was a clever bank movie. Love it!
Public Enemy
Thanks for the kind words Christopher! I do still want to see Bullhead and Undefeated! Both look