March 06, 2006
AOL to sell shows online

AOL to sell shows online

By Kenneth Li

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Time Warner Inc.'s AOL plans to sell programing on its Web site by the middle of this year, a top executive said, as it hastens to secure a place in the market for video-on-demand over the Internet.

The market for online media is booming after Apple Computer Inc. began offering shows for sale on its popular iTunes digital music and videos service last year.

The expansion of AOL's video service, which will combine free and pay-per-download shows from established programmers and user-created video clips, aims to address complaints about the rigid pricing structure and the mix of available programing on iTunes.

AOL to sell shows online

By Kenneth Li

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Time Warner Inc.'s AOL plans to sell programing on its Web site by the middle of this year, a top executive said, as it hastens to secure a place in the market for video-on-demand over the Internet.

The market for online media is booming after Apple Computer Inc. began offering shows for sale on its popular iTunes digital music and videos service last year.

The expansion of AOL's video service, which will combine free and pay-per-download shows from established programmers and user-created video clips, aims to address complaints about the rigid pricing structure and the mix of available programing on iTunes.


It also puts the Dulles, Virginia unit in competition with Yahoo Inc., which this week said it planned to scale back on creating original programing, and Google Inc..

The service will sell Time Warner-owned shows and those created by other programmers and networks, the company said, declining to name partners.

"We've been in discussion for months with every major cable and broadcast network," Kevin Conroy, executive vice president of AOL Media Networks told Reuters.

The video store will appear gradually and is a part of a redesign of an existing video on-demand service on AOL.com, its free Web site.

Ahead of the revamped video offering, AOL will this month introduce In2TV, a site that will carry more than 4,800 free vintage TV shows, mostly from the Warner Brothers archive.

The expanded service is also likely to sell videos on a subscription basis as early as next year to complement its pay- per-download and free video service.

"The whole idea is to give consumers choice," Conroy said in an interview. "I want to make it seamless and easy."

The shows can be viewed on PCs and other devices in the home, using Intel Corp.'s Viiv technology. It will also be viewable on portable media players that use Microsoft Corp. software.

One analyst was skeptical of the pay per download business model AOL plans to employ and said it would face stiff competition against lower cost alternatives, such as EchoStar System Corp.'s PocketDish system.


The PocketDish lets viewers move recorded shows from their living room digital video recorders to a portable media device.

"I'm still skeptical of the size of an individual download model, as (digital video recorder) technology is growing," Richard Greenfield, an analyst at Pali Research said.

AOL's system "needs to evolve to a traditional advertising model, rather than a pay per download model."

AOL's plans to sell videos is part of a broader plan this year to make playing and searching for online videos a cornerstone to the company's turnaround.

In December, it purchased video search engine technology firm Truveo, which uses a technology it calls "Visual Crawling" to locate video files and information on Web pages, finding video text-based search engines miss. "Our goal for 2006 is to deliver as good an experience for video search as consumers have come to expect in text search," Conroy said.

Conroy said AOL plans to share its technology with Google, as part of an earlier deal in which Google pledged to take a 5 percent stake in AOL.

AOL has spent the last few years offering more of its programing for free to boost online advertising as its dial-up modem access is in decline. It currently has about 19.5 million subscribers, down from a high of about 26 million in 2002.

Posted by steve.rosenbaum at 09:12PM on Mar 6, 2006
Comments
Post a Comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Name
Email
URL
Comments


Remember personal info?