Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

10 Actors Hollywood Tried And Failed To Make Happen

by The Playlist Staff
July 31, 2013 1:21 PM
  • |
Actors That Hollywood Tried to make Happen and failed

This week, a small-scale indie Australian surfing movie called “Drift,” which details two surfing brothers struggling to overcome their debt-ridden backgrounds and avoid a descent into criminality, opens in limited release. It shares almost nothing in common with the Biggest-Movie-Of-All-Time “Avatar” except its star, Sam Worthington, who in fact plays third lead here behind two largely unknown Aussie actors as the brothers. If it seems like a far cry from Pandora for Worthington, well, that’s because it is. Nothing to do with the quality of the film, but just in terms of the whisper-quiet buzz it’s getting, which Worthington’s presence alone should have beefed up if his stock in Hollywood meant anything at all. Yet despite a concerted effort that happened back there, Worthington just hasn’t ever become a bankable studio lead, and so here we are.

It’s hardly the first time (and won't be the last) Hollywood has decided that a certain actor is gonna be huge and has done all it can to make that happen, and yet it hasn’t. It’s kind of strange and a little unfair that in a town where we’re regularly assured that every waiter is an actor waiting for his break, some never get a shot while others get more than one, even if audiences don’t embrace them the first time out. But it also shows how strange an echo-box tinseltown can be—sometimes all that needs to happen is that Studio X hears Studio Y loves This Guy for their next big star, and Studio X then has to cast him, and so on. Then a few years later This Guy has six movies coming out, and is on every magazine cover, and audiences, unless they fall in love with him instantly, feel a little aggrieved that they’re so forcefully being sold an unknown quantity.

The circumstances differ, but the phenomenon is the same, so we’ve taken a look at the careers of 10 actors who, despite repeated attempts, We The Audience in our fickle magnificence have simply not deemed worthy of the A-list.

Ryan Reynolds

Ryan Reynolds
Attempts At The Big Time: "Blade Trinity" (2004), "The Amityville Horror" (2005), "Just Friends" (2005), "Definitely Maybe" (2008), "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" (2009), "The Proposal" (2009), "Buried" (2010), "Green Lantern" (2011), "The Change-Up" (2011), "Safe House" (2012), "R.I.P.D." (2013)

Where Did It All Go Wrong? The archetypal example on this list, Reynolds has been tapped as a potential megastar for close to a decade, and every so often looks to have made the leap... nearly. The Canadian actor's been acting since he was a teenager and his ABC sitcom "Two Guys And A Girl" in 1998 helped land him his first lead role in college-com "National Lampoon's Van Wilder" in 2002. It was a charismatic and funny turn, and he soon started cropping up elsewhere—proving to be the highlight of the otherwise execrable "Blade Trinity" and finally getting a studio lead in "The Amityville Horror."

And so he entered his bankable phase, thanks to some modestly successful comedies like "Waiting..." and "Just Friends" that performed well on video, even if more expensive prospects like 'Smokin' Aces" and "Definitely Maybe" didn't land. 2009 proved Reynolds' biggest year yet; a showy turn in "X-Men Origins: Wolverine," an acclaimed supporting part in indie "Adventureland," and most crucially, a giant rom-com hit opposite Sandra Bullock in "The Proposal." He seemed to have arrived in a big way, and lined up a trio of promising prospects—one-man-show indie "Buried," R-rated comedy "The Change-Up" and superhero tentpole "Green Lantern." But the Reynolds train was held up when all three underperformed massively, the latter two in the same summer of 2011. By that point, however, Reynolds was already signed to a couple of other projects and the first of these, "Safe House," proved to be a solid hit, saving the actor's bacon for a moment.

RIPD, Ryan Reynolds

It was the second of the pair, however, that may prove fatal: "R.I.P.D.," the "Men In Black"-esque supernatural action-comedy was once one of Universal's big summer hopes, but by the time of release, they seemed to have given up on it (knowing, as the rest of us do now, that the film was lousy), and it absolutely bombed, now destined to take a place in the all-time flop hall of fame. Worse, Reynolds was also the lead in animation "Turbo" the same weekend, which underperformed as well. Strictly speaking, neither was directly Reynolds' fault—"Turbo" suffered from animation fatigue in the market, while Universal had no faith in "R.I.P.D" whatsoever. But studio executives have already cooled on offering Reynolds tentpole leads—he bowed out of the "Highlander" remake a while back and "Deadpool" is never, ever gonna happen.

To his credit, he's course-correcting, looking to work with interesting filmmakers like Atom Egoyan, Marjane Satrapi, Anna Fleck and Ryan Boden, and Tarsem on upcoming projects. And we hope it works out as Reynolds is a likable presence, popular in comedies and can be very strong in smaller roles. But short of a Matthew McConaughey-like turnaround (and let's not forget, much of this would have applied to him a few years back and now he's the lead in Christopher Nolan's new film), we suspect it's going to be a long time before Hollywood tries to push him as a major box-office draw again.

Any Thoughts? Reynolds told Details Magazine in 2011: "I'm in a very lucky and fortunate place... I remembered walking down that very same street maybe 10 years ago, just shrouded in a sea of abject failure. I had, like, a stick with a handkerchief with some dry, stale bread in it and that was all."

Taylor Kitsch

Taylor Kitsch
Attempts At The Big Time: "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" (2009), "John Carter" (2012), "Battleship" (2012), "Savages" (2012)

Where Did It All Go Wrong: Poor Taylor Kitsch has, despite only a handful of credits to his name, become something of a byword for this kind of actor, after Hollywood stacked a lot of chips on him last summer, most of which they failed to recoup. The Canadian former model had a few movie credits to his name—teen comedy “John Tucker Must Die," "The Craft"-with-bros thriller "The Covenant" and the infamous "Snakes On A Plane"—when he was cast as running back Tim Riggins in the TV translation of "Friday Night Lights." The series was a huge critical hit and Kitsch was an immediate standout, brooding and charismatic. A few seasons in, the actor got his first big movie role—an extended cameo as fan favorite character Gambit in "X-Men Origins: Wolverine." It proved to be a less auspicious start than he might have hoped, but despite the movie being terrible, the role was small enough that it didn't harm Kitsch's rep too much.

Indeed, quite the reverse: soon afterwards, Kitsch was cast as the title character in Andrew Stanton's "John Carter," a much-anticipated Disney tentpole. And once that wrapped, the actor also landed the lead role in another $200 million megamovie, "Battleship." Both shot as long as two years in advance of release, meaning Kitsch had a lot of hype in the run-up to their releases in the spring of 2012 (barely two months apart), hype that only increased when he won a sought-after lead in Oliver Stone's "Savages."He was either going to be Hollywood's next big star, or a spectacular cautionary tale... The buzz around "John Carter" turned poisonous as release neared, and that was borne out when the hugely expensive film took a nine-figure write-down after severely underperforming.

Taylor Kitsch, John Carter

"Battleship" may have seemed a safer prospect, but when it was released, in the aftermath of the behemoth "The Avengers" and accompanied by awful reviews, it too was a major dud, also losing north of $100 million for its studio. Again, neither failure can be laid squarely at Kitsch's feet, but he certainly didn't boost their box office in a way that a more established star might have. "Savages" performed a little better, relatively speaking. The far cheaper film made nearly $50 million but it didn't suggest that Kitsch had gathered any kind of following, and besides, it was too little too late and his name was already tainted. After a decade that saw the biggest movies dominated by the off-beat charms of Johnny Depp and Robert Downey Jr., Kitsch was just a little too bland, or at least the characters he was given were.

Wisely, or perhaps by necessity, the actor's steering clear of further tentpoles for the moment. He's reteaming with "Battleship" helmer Peter Berg for awards candidate "Lone Survivor," he'll be at TIFF with Don McKellar's "The Grand Seduction," and is playing a gay rights activist in Ryan Murphy's HBO movie "The Normal Heart." In other words, he's taking the baby steps into features that he skipped the first time around, and hopefully showing off some more of the acting chops his TV stint had us all convinced of, back when.

Any Thoughts? With the two blockbuster failures in the past, Kitsch was finding a silver lining as he told the AP: "Maybe it's a blessing in disguise that [it] died, and I'm not tied to these things for the next 10 years. I'm free to do whatever I want now. If I want to do something in January, February, March, April, I don't have to go through two studios to be greenlit."

Colin Farrell

Colin Farrell
Attempts At The Big Time: "American Outlaws" (2001), "Hart's War" (2002), "Minority Report" (2002), "The Recruit" (2003), "Daredevil" (2003), "SWAT" (2003), "Alexander" (2004), "Miami Vice" (2006), "Fright Night" (2011), "Total Recall" (2012), "Dead Man Down" (2013)

Where Did It All Go Wrong? Farrell's a rarity in that he's had not one, but two shots at the big leagues, from bright young thing to comeback kid, and despite some fine performances over the years, broader audiences have consistently failed to respond to him when he's been anointed a tentpole lead. The Irish actor broke out aged 24 in Joel Schumacher's "Tigerland," giving an intense performance that promised big things. And big things soon arrived: while early leads "American Outlaws" and "Hart's War" whimpered, he convincingly squared off against Tom Cruise in Steven Spielberg's "Minority Report," and carried solo show "Phone Booth" impressively, and the film became a modest hit. Things seemed to be ticking along decently. "Daredevil" and "S.W.A.T." both made some coin, albeit not as much as he was perhaps hoping. But Farrell then headlined a pair of hugely expensive tentpoles, in "Alexander" and "Miami Vice," and both flopped.

The actor, who'd been having substance abuse issues, wasn't licked yet, though; he cleaned up, regrouped, and returned with a strong performance in the storming "In Bruges" that reminded everybody why they'd been so excited about him in the first place. A few other smaller gigs followed, some of which worked, some didn't, and a financially disappointing return to bigger fare with Peter Weir's "The Way Back" was mitigated by an against-type, combover-wearing cameo in comedy hit "Horrible Bosses." But since then, things have been bleaker with a couple of major summer flops in "Fright Night" and "Total Recall," which made less money than the twenty-years-earlier Paul Verhoeven original.

Total Recall, Colin Farrell

Films more in his wheelhouse didn't perform much better either, with "Seven Psychopaths" and "Dead Man Down" both failing to find much of a theatrical audience. Ultimately, Farrell is not dissimilar to Jude Law; like him, Farrell's really a character actor in the hot bod of a leading man, whose finest hours have come in smaller-scale fare like "The New World," "Ondine" or "A Home At The End Of The World." But while Law's now found his place, mostly happy to play second fiddle to Robert Downey Jr. or take meatier character parts for noted filmmakers like Steven Soderbergh or Joe Wright, Farrell—who never really established a new persona once he shook off the hellraiser mantle—is still being pushed as a headliner. He was to star in the since canceled "Arthur & Lancelot" for Warner Bros., and has "Winter's Tale" on the way from the studio. But unless the latter proves an unexpected smash, expect to see less of that sort of thing and more like his upcoming supporting turns in "Saving Mr. Banks" and "Miss Julie." And to be honest, that may be for the best.

Any Thoughts? On the eve of the release of "Total Recall," Farrell told The Observer: "I'd done a certain amount of big budget films that didn't perform that well. Consequently, there weren't that many big films that were coming knocking for me. I was probably due an arse kicking. I really was... I can't say that I sat down and said, 'Right, I am going to reinvest.' I know from talking to some friends and different people that it looks as though I've tried to redesign my career, but it's not really like that."

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    


  • EB | April 26, 2014 2:12 AMReply

    The word "tentpole" is used 8 times in this article.

  • B.B. | April 8, 2014 1:45 PMReply

    Some interesting points brought up but really, now. These actors you deem 'failed' are to me under-the-radar actors who have done cool but obscure movies. Your mention of Clive Owen is ridiculous - his performances in Sin City and Closer were great.

  • Troy | February 22, 2014 1:48 AMReply

    Some of these guys are still young enough "to make happen"

  • Jay | December 26, 2013 6:59 PMReply

    Add Shia Labeouf to that list, his career is non-existent nowadays after he left Transformers.

  • Cheistophet Orseth | December 25, 2013 9:11 PMReply

    I do not agree with at least some of these actors on this list.

  • carmeisha eans | December 15, 2013 4:07 PMReply

    I want to play a part

  • James | December 12, 2013 10:37 PMReply

    I am surprised you mentioned Taylor Lautner but not Kellan Lutz.

  • Alex | December 12, 2013 10:24 PMReply

    You missed Hayden Christensen and Armie Hammer, and I like several of the other actors here, and that includes Sam Worthington and Josh Hartnett. I like Lucky Number Slevin, very much as a matter of fact, and I hope he makes a comeback. I believe, and I was talking about it with a friend who is insane about action films and the lack of young action stars, that Taylor Lautner is perfect, tailor made for that position. He is a natural athlete, he is in amazing shape, and has no big acting skills, so, tailor made! Just give the kid a chance, he is still very young. As for Alex Pettyfer, he is being punished for speaking frankly. He is good looking, he is a good actor and has screen presence; he just needs a better publicist, that's all, and a manager who can take care of him; after all, isn't that what managers are for? I like Ryan Reynolds better when he is not doing comedies, like Safe House and Buried. Never thought a film like Buried would keep me intersted from beginning to end, and he's the only actor onscreen. And come on! John Carter is not a masterpiece, but there are SO many bad films, I really don't get why this one in particular was so cursed. I am sure Taylor Kitsch will be back as well.

  • chrissy | December 9, 2013 4:51 PMReply

    Erm...Speaking as an Actress who is currently working on a job that pays equity minimum, this article is a crock! For the most part these Actors are HUGE stars...Not everybody is going to have Brad Pitt's career and why should they, they are all different actors bringing different things to the industry. Just because an actor isnt on a path to "leading man" does not mean theyve failed to make it happen. Everyone has their own path and all of them are young enough/hot enough/popular enough to still make some extremely successful movies. In anycase they have all had successes, made a bucket load of money and are in the public eye.
    If you are calling these people failures then what the hell are the rest of us!!!!! Get real.

  • Werner Kyne | November 29, 2013 10:38 PMReply

    I feel it is justified to add Russell Crowe to the list.
    Started small in NZ/OZ got big quick in Hollywood quite early and then fizzled ever since.
    Everything after The Insider was just going through the payday motions and his Superman cameo did not impress - though the suit of armour was badass, just not on a not very tall, 50 year old greying guy with a paunch.
    He is not a man who is ageing well.
    I hear his Noah gig may go straight to DVD, as a few of his recent films have.
    If only Mel stayed in Australia - he'd still be at the top of his game, and Crowe irrelevant.

  • Sal | November 29, 2013 8:51 PMReply

    Sam Worthington, yes.
    How about another Aussie in Myles Pollard?
    Graduated from same class as Worthington and was instantly a success, where the other was not.
    Pollard now just doing small DSLR shot features and online shorts, plus some pokey TV here and there.
    But of course he is not yet listed here and Worthington is, so perhaps all is not lost for Pollard just yet.

  • Paul Muller | November 29, 2013 3:55 PMReply

    My Name is paul.I will love to share my testimony to all the people in the forum cos i never thought i will have my girlfriend back and she means so much to me..The girl i want to get marry to left me 4 weeks to our wedding for another man..,When i called her she never picked my calls,She deleted me on her facebook and she changed her facebook status from engage to Single…when i went to her place of work she told her boss she never want to see me..I lost my job as a result of this cos i cant get myself anymore,my life was upside down and everything did not go smooth with my life…I tried all i could do to have her back to all did not work out until i met a Man when i Travel to Africa to execute some business have been developing some years back..I told him my problem and all have passed through in getting her back and how i lost my job…he told me he gonna help me…i don’t believe that in the first place.but he swore he will help me out and he told me the reason why my girlfriend left me and also told me some hidden secrets.i was amazed when i heard that from him..he said he will cast a spell for me and i will see the results in the next couple of days..then i travel back to Germany the following day and i called him when i got home and he said he’s busy casting those spells and he has bought all the materials needed for the spells,he said am gonna see positive results in the next 2 days that is Thursday.My girlfriend called me at exactly 12:35pm on Thursday and apologies for all she had done ..she said,she never knew what she’s doing and her sudden behavior was not intentional and she promised not to do that was like am dreaming when i heard that from her and when we ended the call,i called the man and told him my my girl friend called and he said i haven’t seen anything yet… he said i will also get my job back in 3 days time..and when its Sunday,they called me at my place of work that i should resume work on Monday and they gonna compensate me for the time limit i have spent at home without working..My life is back into shape,i have my girlfriend back and we are happily married now with a baby boy and i have my job back too.This man is really powerful..if we have up to 20 people like him in the world,the world would have been a better place..he has also helped many of my friends to solve many problems and they are all happy now..Am posting this to the forum for anybody that is interested in meeting the man for can mail him to priest_gbenga.magic_temple(at)priest(dot)com, I cant give out his number cos he told me he don’t want to be disturbed by many people across the world..he said his email is okay and he also have a web site if you want to visit him there’ he will replied to any emails asap..hope he helped u out too..good luck.

  • noname | November 29, 2013 3:10 AMReply

    i won BET award 2013. sorry, i won't say my name here, for some security reason. all thanks to mother esango who made it possible with her powerful magic spell she did for me. my album is blazing all over the world and i have a lot of fans here and there. thank mother.
    you can contact her on esangoshrine(AT)gmail . com

  • meeks | November 29, 2013 3:08 AMReply

    Hi everyone i will never forget the help the Mother Esango Shrine render to me in my marital life. i have been married for 4 years now and my husband and i love each other very dearly . after 3 years of our marriage my husband suddenly change he was having an affair with a lady outside,i notice it then i was praying for divine intervention the thing became more serious i told my pastor about it we prayed but nothing happen. my husband just came home one day he pick up his things and left me and the kids to his mistress outside at this time i was confuse not knowing what to do again because i have lost my husband and my marriage too. i was just checking my mails in the office when i saw someone sharing her testimony on how the Mother Esango help her out with her marital problems so i contacted the email of Mother Esango. I told her my problem and i was told to be calm that i have come to the right place that i should fill some information concerning my self i did after some time she called me again congratulating me that my problems will be solve within 13days. She told me what went wrong with my husband and how it happen. that they will restored my marriage but i will make a free donation to their Shrine anything my heart told me. to my greatest surprise my husband came to my office begging me on his knees that i should find a place in my heart to forgive him i quickly ask him up that i have forgiven him.friends your case is not too hard why don't you give Mother Esango a try she powerful and kind. i know she will also bring back your husband. i promise to keep sharing her good work any time i'm on the internet. when ever i come across a forum like this, i always share the testimony. contact her via or visit her website

  • Moniqu | November 28, 2013 2:59 AMReply

    I really like Colin Farrell but I think I'd like to see him as a bad guy. He looks and seems like he would make a very good QUIET and sexy villain. I definitely like him as an actor but he does need to expand his character types. Perhaps he would be good in a romantic comedy. ?? If he has done one then forgive me. lol

  • Daniel Mann | November 26, 2013 2:02 AMReply

    This great information , you need your imdb.

  • Stampece | November 9, 2013 1:25 AMReply

    Ever see a movie made before 1990?

  • ken lang | November 3, 2013 8:41 PMReply

    (underscore does not show up on my email even though I typed it in right after ken.)

    I just now read this column. Were there previous editions? Because I'd like to know if Travis Fimmel ever appeared here.

  • Allie | November 3, 2013 2:24 AMReply

    Sean Bean, Alec Baldwin, and Rutger Hauer.

  • jon | October 25, 2013 12:52 PMReply

    Where the hell is Pia Zadora?

  • you | October 1, 2013 6:07 PMReply


  • Direct movie | September 25, 2013 1:47 AMReply

    You will really love this!! I foud a website where you can download HD movies in high speed, No regisrations needed and its 100% free. its

  • Direct movie | September 24, 2013 2:36 AMReply

    You will really love this!! I foud a website where you can download HD movies in high speed, No regisrations needed and its 100% free. its

  • Direct movie | September 18, 2013 1:07 AMReply

    You will really love this Playlist website! It is so good!

  • fran | September 11, 2013 3:39 PMReply

    Umm.. I'm pretty sure they've made it they have all starred in big Hollywood movies movies and are probably filthy rich!

  • Anonymous | August 18, 2013 2:32 AMReply

    WHO GIVES A SHIT? THEY ARE STILL FILTHY RICH!!!!!! Millionaires!! Even if you make it, or you don't, you'll still become rich!!

  • Anonymous | August 18, 2013 2:30 AMReply

    WHO GIVES A SHIT? THEY ARE FILTHY RICH EITHER WAY!!!!!!!!! Millionaires!!!!! Either you make it, or not, you will still become rich!!

  • acting | August 16, 2013 9:34 AMReply

    do you want to be an actor do you got all it takes contact amaka igwe studios today for more information on registration our email is amakaigweproductions at gmail dot com or call the M.D +2348100936562

  • John | August 14, 2013 8:05 AMReply

    Some of the actors on this list - namely Colin Farrell and Ryan Reynolds - don't really belong under the title 'tried and made it fail to happen'. Next to Farrell's name you've listed 11 movies in 10 years, with half of them being profitable. His problem - along with most box office flops - is that he has this ability to pick scripts which are destined to fail.

    I can usually immediately tell whether or not a film is going to make a significant return by reading a synopsis and looking at the title, and I'm pretty sure a lot of other people can. But it doesn't matter who you are, if you are offered a huge budget box office film you're not going to turn it down. What puzzles me is how the studios sign off on some of them.

  • verss | August 11, 2013 3:12 AMReply

    I saw Josh Hartnett in London at a play "Rain Man" (character Charlie Babbitt) and was amazing,also he's surprising in "Mozart and the Whale"(character with Asperger's syndrome ) and in movies as August and Lucky Number Slevin really excellent performances

  • Billy The Kid | August 8, 2013 11:50 PMReply

    GERARD BUTLER. enough said.

  • H.M Barnett | August 8, 2013 10:26 PMReply

    Very obscure one but Chris Klein? He opened with 2 biggies-"Election" & "American Pie" which were critical & box office successes with great buzz & are still fondly recalled. I know sadly that his drinking was definitely involved in his downturn. I wish him well and hope he is able to move on from his troubled past. Saw that he's listed on some episodes of "Wilfred" currently...the show with Elijah Wood (who may be another guy good for this list?).

  • Zac | August 7, 2013 4:35 AMReply

    Alex Pettyfer shouldn't feel too flattered about the Lee Daniels gig as Daniels only hires attractive white young guys so he can have them flopping around in wet see-thru underwear. Pettyfer's role will most likely be a similarly fetishized, sexualized role consisting of him skinny-dipping frequently and/or dancing in a towel.

  • Chris | August 6, 2013 7:42 AMReply

    Mediocre or outright poor scripts haven't helped these performers but the main problem is that alot of the guys(and gal) on the list aren't or weren't really charismatic or talented enough to rise above the material which is exactly what makes a movie star.

    Back in the 90s before he became the consistent box office draw of today alot of Denzel Washington's attempted star vehicles were in pictures that aside from flopping or underperforming also weren't worthy of his talent (HEART CONDITION, RICOCHET etc) and yet from movie to movie he always remained a watchable presence. You never harboured doubts that Denzel would get to the level ppl were pegging for him despite the failures.

  • Emerson | August 5, 2013 10:12 PMReply

    I agree with a lot of this list, but I also agree with most of the names in the comments as being eligible for the list. Is it possible that the real issue is that "movie star" in the classic Hollywood sense is gone? That they existed in an era where the studios built them and marketed them through a very limited number of essentially captive marketing outlets. Once the star/studio system broke down, the public was still inclined to follow the world of the stars that had been created, and met new stars in their films, so the cycle continued. With the explosion of other avenues for media and marketing, controlling the image and attention is much more difficult. I think exploring whether or not there has been a single new "bankable" star in the last 20 years shows that it's not inherently these actors faults. We, the audience, have changed. We haven't really allowed any new star to join the "we'll show up just because they are in it" firmament - because we don't think that way anymore. It doesn't matter who they are. Even historically "bankable" stars have to be careful not to step too far out of what we want from them if the money is going to roll in. When even Will Smith can flop massively, it seems the greater point is there may never again be true movie stars and they should stop trying to make them and focus on the quality of the project, the script and the talent - and quit trying to ensure the fame of an actor is enough to cover any and all other failings in the process.

  • Jeff | August 5, 2013 6:01 PMReply

    Nicholas Hoult should be added to this one day.

  • Bash | August 4, 2013 11:48 PMReply

    Paul Bettany?

  • MishuPishu | August 3, 2013 8:04 PMReply

    My wife and I were just talking about how this happened to Alec Baldwin back in the early 90's. He seemed poised for this leap into leading man territory as a steely-eyed tough guy but it just never took off. It's nice to see him reinvent himself as a comedic actor all these years later.

  • eddie | August 3, 2013 4:03 PMReply

    This article is so ridiculous. Who told you being considered A-list is everything? That doesn't mean being talented or genuine or having a good personality. It just means being a box office hit and we know even lousy actors can do that. Sylverster Stallone is one, morons. Adam Sandler, the Twilight kids, Schwartzenegger are examples too. The Playlist wants lousy controversy, not real journalism. PATHETIC. Shame on you.

  • daisy | August 3, 2013 3:49 PMReply

    Robert Pattinson deserve to be in this list. Outside that crappy franchise he hasn't had one hit. It's flop after flop, even pushing him as the lead to attract women. It's not working. Now he is just a supporting actor in obscure B-films.

  • BPositive | August 9, 2013 11:36 PM

    Remember Me and Water for Elephants earned more than three times their budgets!

    Cronenberg's Cosmopolis starring Robert Pattinson was warmly applauded at Cannes.
    It appeared on 25 Top 5 BEST FILM 2012 lists and on 69 Top 10 lists.

  • Dalovely | August 5, 2013 9:59 PM

    Agree. He has only received attention because he and ex, Kristen Stewart are forever Robsten. His acting is very bland because he has no range. I suspect we will here about a reunion with his ex because that brand Robsten is all he can ever really sell.

  • BRUBANK | August 3, 2013 4:04 PM

    He was godawful in the godawful Cosmopolis, one of the worst films I've ever seen. Go away! Nobody wants you anymore.

  • kobain | August 3, 2013 3:55 PM

    Yeah Pattinson's 15 minuts is over. He was proven unsuccessful as lead actor and is a C-list name now. Good riddance by the way. He is godawful. And fugly.

  • Amanda | August 3, 2013 2:49 PMReply

    Gerald Butler should be on this list. Consider every movie he's made after 300. Even Michael Fassbender who had a tiny role in 300 has surpassed him by miles...

  • Sal | November 29, 2013 10:27 PM

    Jesus, enough already!!!

  • Amanda | August 3, 2013 2:48 PMReply

    Gerald Butler should be on this list. Consider every movie he's made after 300. Even Michael Fassbender who had a tiny role in 300 has surpassed him by miles...

  • Amanda | August 3, 2013 2:48 PMReply

    Gerald Butler should be on this list. Consider every movie he's made after 300. Even Michael Fassbender who had a tiny role in 300 has surpassed him by miles...

  • Amanda | August 3, 2013 2:47 PMReply

    Gerald Butler should be on this list. Consider every movie he's made after 300. Even Michael Fassbender who had a tiny role in 300 has surpassed him by miles...

  • pots | August 16, 2013 5:08 AM

    Obviously a GB one-nighter/throw away

  • pots | August 16, 2013 5:08 AM

    Obviously a GB one-nighter/throw away

  • trey | August 15, 2013 12:18 AM

    We fucking got it the first time.

  • FILMBUFF | August 3, 2013 2:26 PMReply

    Of course I realize the injustice of this list being predominately white male, but I was also struck by the fact that half the actors on this list are not Americans. Meanwhile three of the five American actors listed got their big breaks back in the 1990s. The trend too hire foreign actors to play Americans in big film roles is not an accident. Its all part of the economic war on Americans also known as globalization. Hollywood union busts by outsourcing TV & film production to other countries such as Canada, or Right to Work Southern American states. They hire non-American talent to prevent donations to the Democratic Party.

  • steve | April 7, 2014 10:58 PM


  • Julian | August 3, 2013 3:16 AMReply

    urgh.....and now I need to add my edits..."jawline"....and "good" in the final sentence.

  • Julian | August 3, 2013 3:14 AMReply

    Here's something ACTORS view. Had it occurred to you that lack of talent has nothing to do with the "bankability" of these guys, and that they just had the bad luck, or bad agent, to have picked DUD movies. I do not go to a movie to gush over the "lead", I want to be told a story and believe that he is part of it. Reynolds has GREAT comic talent and an engaging personality in non-comic roles maybe he just picked movies that were not going to do much for him. The main problem in the whole industry now is just what you have been talking about, movies being touted on WHO is there rather than about the actor, watch the actor, and try to ignore the fact that most of the film is rehashed, plot-less, bilge. There was a time when a movie about IDEAS sold, now it has to have whizzbangs every 10 seconds or the audience falls asleep. That says nothing about the quality of the acting, just the quality of the audience.....when the jawling outweighs the talent......give up on the about now would be a food time.

  • LuLo3280 | August 3, 2013 2:43 AMReply

    Umm what about Jaleel White? Hello???

  • Alex | August 3, 2013 2:22 AMReply

    For some reason. Gretchen Mol is the only one of these people I find attractive.

    Anyway, I swear the Avatar guy always looks like he's been computer-rendered to me, no matter what thing of his I'm watching. Skeet Ulrich got a bad rap because he played a Johnny Depp-esque role in Scream. I don't think you can call any of these actors failures, we certainly know who most of them are and a few of them probably made some decent cash.

  • This is Mean | August 2, 2013 7:53 PMReply

    Not only is this mean, it isn't how acting careers work. Way to go, IndieWire. I'm going to write an article about articles you tried and failed to make happen. Dicks.

  • Jerry Hoffman | August 2, 2013 3:34 PMReply

    This is an interesting and obvious list. One has to come across from it and think - some of these actors are non-American and Caucasian. It is difficult to be the leading man type and sale a big budget film. I wonder if the opportunity is giving to minorities a 1/3 of the time as the Caucasian received and what will the results be. I just wonder if America is tire of watching a certain leading man type - read, boring. Because, in the past, the leads were very interesting on film. Maybe is time to diversify, not for the sake of diversifying to satisfy a particular quote in a racial harmony sense, but, to branch out in style of film making. I'm interested to see what will happen in the upcoming years in the film industry, where, the mentioned actors, even Johnny Depp in Lone Ranger is not a guarantee in big returns. Will they prop up more of the same kind of actors in the pool or take risk of interesting choices.

  • MandiLikesFilms | August 4, 2013 11:46 AM

    Will studios continue pushing the same thing that's not working OR try to reflect societal demographics on screen and give us a wider range of movie stars?
    If only they'd spend as much time looking for the Michael B Jordans of the world instead of the square-jawed white guy who wise-cracks and is on a solo mission to save the world...

  • Xas | August 2, 2013 11:47 AMReply

    Colin Farrell is a good character actor, don't get me wrong, but all his big Hollywood productions failed in expectations, the same thing happens with Ryan Reynolds -His performance in Buried is imo underrated-. Reynolds and Farrell are two steps up of the list. They have chance to reinvent their career.

    About the other names of the list:
    Taylor Kitsch: He's mostly a bland actor -And yes, I saw all his "good" performances-. I still remember the lousy People's article called him: "The next Brad Pitt" lol
    Sam Worthington: I give him chops for Somersault, The Debt and Last Night, but anyone else, ugh. But aside Farrell and Reynolds, he's the only one with a big chance of comeback.
    Alex Pettyfer: Personally i'm glad. Maybe his destiny will be starring low budget erotic films like Martin Hewitt did after "Endless Love"
    Taylor Lautner: While I think he's a lousy actor, maybe we should wait how Tracks will perform.

    And maybe we should add other names:

    Hayden Christensen: The perfect example of this phenomenon.
    Orlando Bloom: Even his "succesful films" weren't exactly HIS films
    Jessica Biel: The female Hayden Christensen. At this stage, her career is being "Mrs. Justin Timberlake"
    Kate Bosworth: She's mostly known for her relationships than her work
    Julia Ormond: At least Mol and her are succesful character actresses.
    Katie Holmes: Right now, Michelle Williams is the most respected actress from Dawson's Creek.
    Jessica Alba: Albeit her performance in "The Killer Inside Me" is great, her career is lackluster at best.

    And I have doubts to put Rachel McAdams on the list: She's "Mean Girls", "Red Eye" and "The Vow", but her career felt on expectations, especially after "Morning Glory". But maybe "A Most Wanted Man" is her comeback role

    The best part of this is that nothing is written in stone yet for some names and they can have a second opportunity or have the opportunity to be character actors:

    Channing Tatum: Before 2012, he was on roll of this phenomenon, but then five consecutive box office hits and even critical acclaim took him on stardom.
    Jake Gyllenhaal: With "End of Watch" and his theater work in 2012 he's having a second wind.
    Garrett Hendlund: Excellent choice going to the indie route first like Ryan Gosling and Joseph Gordon-Levitt did
    Julia Ormond: Like Gretchen Mol, she's better as character actress.

  • lifeisaboxof | August 3, 2013 4:11 PM

    Agree about Hedlund. He was spectacular in ON THE ROAD, a very difficult role he nailed completely. He owned that film and people who saw him only in Tron Legacy is completely wrong and bad informed about this actor. He is working with The Coen Brothers in the next film also. One of the most talented actors of his generation for me.

  • Xas | August 2, 2013 11:49 AM

    Oh, I forgot Kirsten Dunst in the career rennaisance after 2010.

  • sne | August 2, 2013 11:41 AMReply

    So no matter your acting chops, you only get a push if you are white. Well Danzel and Will are truly special for what they've done.

  • Ignacio Balbuena | August 2, 2013 11:14 AMReply

    I just wanna mention that 'Blade'', was directed by Stephen Norrington, Blade 2 was directed by Del Toro. Both are great, though.

  • Sadie | August 2, 2013 5:51 AMReply

    Jason Statham has earned his place on this list!

  • Ams | October 12, 2013 3:11 PM

    Jason's great at what he does. It's his domain. When asked if he would ever try a romantic comedy, he said he'd leave that to Hugh Grant. He said you have to play to your strengths. Love him.

  • Erica | August 3, 2013 9:53 AM

    I think that Jason is profitable for Hollywood because of the type of movies he makes but despite the profit it does not necessarily mean he is GOOD actor. In fact, you don' t have to be to make a movie that somehow appeals to the population. I do not think Will Smith is a great actor but he has shown that he can bring in the bucks this is why he is more present in movies than other actors like Colin Farrell whom I think has not done well for Hollywood but has the stuff as an actor---FAR more than Will Smith but this is my opinion, of course.

  • Lisa | August 1, 2013 11:22 PMReply

    Jason Ritter is a gem and relatively unknown as an actor. I've seen him in so so to not so good projects and he still manages to stand out and do his thing (Joan of Arcadia, The Event, Peter and Vandy). He was fantastic in the movie Good Dick (2008).

  • Indie Wire jumps the shark | August 1, 2013 10:53 PMReply

    Thoughts? A once-promising blog has descended into utter shite. Maybe you should take a hard look at your own careers.

  • Steve | August 1, 2013 6:16 PMReply

    Adam Brody?

  • John | August 1, 2013 10:17 AMReply

    WHY ARE THERE NO WOMEN ON THIS LIST? Gretchen Mol is the only female actor you could think of, really?

    It's tremendously frustrating when the writers at Indiewire, who damn well know better, compile lists like this and only, or predominantly, choose male actors. Why do you do that, writers? Why?!

  • Erica | August 3, 2013 9:55 AM

    You are SO right!! I think Vera Farmiga is just amazing and Maggie Gyllenhaal--she was BRILLIANT in Sherry Baby.

  • Indie Wire jumps the shark | August 1, 2013 10:55 PM

    Because women don't rile up their knee-jerk feelings of inadequacy the way other young men do.

  • James | August 1, 2013 12:06 PM

    Yes, why are there no women on this list focusing on failure?! Women can fail as well as men. I demand to have an equal number of women added to the list to show how easily actresses can fail to connect with an audience. That will definitely represent a step forward for women.

  • M | August 1, 2013 9:12 AMReply

    Where's the terrible terrible ASHTON KUTCHER?! Just Married, Cheaper by the Dozen, A Lot Like Love, The Guardian, What Happens in Vegas, Valentine's Day, Killers, No Strings Attached and New Year's Eve! And Kathryn Heigl for suuuuuuuure! Milla Jovovich, Jessica Biel, Russell Brand (love him but his films are never a hit), Katie Holmes, Megan Fox, Jessica Alba, Sienna Miller and Kate Bosworth!

  • Daniel Delago | August 1, 2013 7:38 AMReply

    Whatever happened to Gretchen Mol? She was good in a quirky rom-com titled, 'The Shape of Things' also starring Rachel Weisz. Interesting how Weisz's acting career skyrocketed and hers never took off. I think Brad Pitt said it best, "Fame is a bitch, man."

  • Alan B | August 1, 2013 9:14 AM

    You two are aware of a little channel called HBO and a series called 'Boardwalk Empire', right? Scorsese ring any bells?

  • bob hawk | August 1, 2013 7:58 AM

    I think the first time I was really aware of Mol was in the Off Broadway production of Neil LaBute's THE SHAPE OF THINGS, holding her own with the rest of the excellent actors (Weisz, Paul Rudd and Fred Weller) who also did the film version. The last time I saw Mol (within the past year) was again Off B'way -- managing to maintain her dignity and cred in a woefully underdeveloped play.

  • Ella | August 1, 2013 7:00 AMReply

    The fact that they are acting at all means they are successful. Not everyone has to be Johnny Depp. Colin Farrell is v successful and Taylor Lautner hasn't had time to prove himself yet/ He's 21..

  • Xas | August 2, 2013 11:26 AM

    Not everyone has to be Johnny Depp. Oh please Ella. The object of this article is exactly what you saying. Which actors were promoted as big star and failed. Even if you ask many of them, they would want the same.

  • bob hawk | August 1, 2013 6:02 AMReply

    This is a stupefyingly stupid article -- rambling all over the place, from constantly employed actors with large bodies of works to some who have barely entered puberty (metaphorically, of course) in their careers. And who can say which of them even WANT to be "stars" in the conventional industry/studio sense? How can you even put Colin Farrell and Taylor Lautner under the same umbrella? And what's with the token female, Gretchen Mol? Absurd. Skeet Ulrich, whose career has been rich and diverse, if erratic, put it best: "Whatever labels are being pinned on me have nothing to do with me." I think in some cases these actors' careers have suffered because of bad management, but, as stated above, how can any of us presume to know what the motivations and goals are of these individuals?

  • Indie Wire jumps the shark | August 1, 2013 10:59 PM

    Your writing and critical thinking skills far exceed the author's.

  • CrombyMouse | August 1, 2013 2:49 AMReply

    You can not count Hedlund for example because he had only one shot for stardom (which is Tron) which was not good but it was not so bad and there's a potential. Since he picks up interesting projects - On the Road (in which he was good), Llewyn Davis and upcoming Mojave and film with Amy Adams. I put my money for him.

    Farrell and Owen are also no good choice. The played various roles films of various quality to be honest but still they are both good actors.

    I would also add Gerald Butler to this list.

    As for Worthington, Kitsch, Walker, Lautner - they are all just terrible actors. The paradox with Worthington that he turned out to be B-class actor who has a contract to star in most profitable project ever. So he'll receive he's next chance soon.

    But my main objection to this artcle is that I don't see the point. Maybe some actors are just don't want to be "stars". Ryan Gosling, for instance, had all the cards to do it after "The Notebook" but prefered to go indie.

  • brycedavid | July 31, 2013 11:34 PMReply

    Where's Eric Bana? Seriously he has had more high profile projects with big directors which flatlined than anyone on the list.

    The lack of actresses on the list is also suspect.

  • Danh | August 1, 2013 12:12 AM

    Are you serious. Did you see Munich? The guy was f'ing incredible in it. And he actually made a believable Hector in "Troy". He was criminally underused in Star Trek.

  • Daniel | July 31, 2013 11:30 PMReply

    Great list.

  • Pretty White Actor #6439 | July 31, 2013 10:46 PMReply

    What a diverse array of actors who really stand out from the crowd. I'm shocked that Hollywood is treating them like they're all bland and interchangeable 18-34 year old pretty white actors.

  • Helluva | August 2, 2013 9:49 AM


  • JD | July 31, 2013 9:57 PMReply

    How was Oliver Stone's ALEXANDER in any way shape or form a "tentpole"? It was an Oliver Stone movie.

Email Updates