Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Bringing Balance To The Force? 5 Directions The New 'Star Wars' Films Could Go

Features
by Oliver Lyttelton
October 31, 2012 10:59 AM
31 Comments
  • |

3. Ignore The Books, Ignore Grandpa Luke & Han, Create A New Story Set After The End Of 'Return Of The Jedi'
The two ideas above are the most obvious, but let's not forget that Disney aren't just saying that they want to make Episodes VII, VIII and IX, they want to make a "Star Wars" movie every two or three years for the foreseeable future. That means they'd have to move away from Luke, Leia and co. at some point, and you might as well do that sooner rather than later. After all, it's a big fictional universe out there. And the last word on what Lucas was planning as a continuation on the franchise was a live-action TV series, set around the fringes of the universe after the end of 'Revenge Of The Sith,' with Rick McCallum saying in an interview that the series would have involved "the Empire slowly building up its power base around the galaxy, what happens in Coruscant, which is the major capital, and it’s [about] a group of underground bosses who live there and control drugs, prostitution." It's not likely to follow that exact path (and that TV show, already written, could feasibly appear somewhere, but it’s doubtful even ABC could handle it), but it's entirely possible that they may try and follow a similar tangent. One could pick up with a new set of characters in the aftermath of the defeat of the Empire, allowing more creative freedom, with a smaller shadow cast from the original trilogy. You could focus on a new Jedi, a bounty hunter, something entirely different -- and that's certainly likely to attract the younger, hungrier names that would make fans happier, people who'd want to put their own stamp on the franchise. Let's call it "The Bourne Legacy" take on Episode VII -- new characters, possibly a new tone, dealing with the political and social repercussions of the shift in power, but maintaining plot ties to the original movies in the background. Hell, if you wanted to bring in someone from the original cast in a supporting role (in a sort of J.J. Abrams/Leonard Nimoy kind of way), maybe you could do that to appease fans that need some familiar signifiers or faces.

4. Go Way Into the Future, With All New Characters; Essentially Carte Blanche To Start Again
As the opening crawl famously had it, the "Star Wars" films are set, "A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away." That gives you plenty of leeway, even if you take it literally, so why should Episode VII and beyond focus on the aftermath of the original trilogy? The 2006 comic series "Star Wars: Legacy," for instance, is set 130 years after the conclusion of the original trilogy, with Cade Skywalker, a distant relative of Luke, facing off against a new aspirant Sith lord. And why not stop there? The basic mythology -- Jedis, Sith, Jawas, Ewoks, all of it -- is solid enough to maintain a continuity, so why not set a new film a thousand years in the future? Let a new filmmaker remake the universe in their own fashion, and turn the whole thing on its head. Surely that's the most interesting approach, and the one most likely to land intriguing creative figures to shepherd the new movies. And having squandered goodwill so severely with the prequel trilogy, the new films could use an exciting name to get people back on board. Of course, this is the riskier approach. It's creating new on top of old, without characters or even necessarily iconographic ties to the original movies. And frankly, if Lucas has written these outlines, we suspect that it's not the way the films are going to go, at least at first. But to us, it feels like the most exciting and creatively satisfying approach.

5. Don't Go Forward, Go Back
Yeah, Lucas has said that he's outlined Episodes VII, VIII and IX (and then at other times said he’d never thought of any further story). But how literal is he being? Does that mean an exact continuation of where we left off with 'Return Of The Jedi'? Or does it simply mean "more 'Star Wars' movies?" Because if it's the latter, who's to say that we can't delve further into the background? The prequel trilogy might have disappointed, but in a way it's because they hewed far too closely to the original films -- the unnecessary backstory of Darth Vader, appearances from young Chewbacca, etc. Why not set the film during the original trilogy, with other rebel groups fighting against the Empire? Or follow the story of the popular-among-fans "Clone Wars" animated series, and pick up on that conflict? Or go smaller scale, and track smugglers and pirates and gangsters, like the mooted TV series, a darker take which would make an aging fanbase happy? Or you could go back even further, following the lead of the "Old Republic" video games, set thousands of years before "The Phantom Menace," and which have proven to be a rich and resilient setting. The great benefit of what Lucas has created -- and probably the reason that Disney paid $4 billion for his company -- is the depth and richness of his universe, so why not go a longer, longer time ago, in a galaxy further away?

Thoughts? Do any of these ideas sound appealing? Have your own ideas? Sound off below on where you think the direction of the new “Star Wars” films should go.
 

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

31 Comments

  • PS | November 10, 2012 11:10 AMReply

    And please. Stop it with that Nolan bs.

  • PS | November 10, 2012 11:09 AMReply

    Geez. I love the Star Wars movies (the original ones and the new ones), books and comics, but really all of these options to continue the movies are horrible. And as great as a continuation with the original cast would be, looking at current pictures of Ford, Hamill and Fisher makes me realize that too much time has passed. They all look terrible and havent't aged well. I don't want some retirement home escapees take the lead in the new Star Wars movies. I loved the idea of the TV show that shows the establishment of the Empire with new characters. I hope that one still happens. Not so interested in the movies as the potential of being disappointed is massive.

  • dkjd | November 7, 2012 11:13 PMReply

    Pls, continue the story after Teh Return of the Jedi with the original cast... and let Nolan direct it.

  • commonprosperity.org | November 5, 2012 8:11 PMReply

    Great gfeature.

  • DJH | November 5, 2012 7:18 PMReply

    I would love to see the X-Wing Series brought to the big screen in a trilogy!!!

  • sergiodasneves | November 5, 2012 2:54 PMReply

    I say: Listen to the fans, for once. There are a lot of good ideas out there.

  • Sarah | November 5, 2012 3:26 AMReply

    good choices.

  • Stephen | November 4, 2012 11:50 PMReply

    I think it would be interesting to make films on the backstories of some of the main supporting characters who are very popular like boba fett and darth maul and similar to what they are doing with the avengers have the stories come together in one film

  • J. G. | November 4, 2012 4:44 PMReply

    Here's an idea: make Star Wars into the WWII of its own universe. Therefore, you could have "Star Wars: Saving Private Oobi Watsit," or whatever, like Saving Private Ryan, but in space, or something along those lines. Lots of WWII movies involve the setting, premise, and ideas of WWII genre, but do not even show Hitler or any of the famous people who made WWII happen and go the way it did. So, Star Wars could do something similar and have characters and stories that never cross paths so much with the original cast.

  • nightgoat72 | November 3, 2012 8:59 PMReply

    I always thought an Old Republic trilogy seemed most logical.

  • heather | November 3, 2012 3:57 PMReply

    Bring in the daughter Jaina

  • Q | November 2, 2012 10:41 AMReply

    Guillermo del Toro

  • BMCD | November 2, 2012 12:10 AMReply

    I know it might be too much because he's directing the star trek franchise, but JJ Abrams is Steven Speilberg Jr. But, I realize that that's too much to ask. Check out Conan's parody clips of how different directors would direct Star Wars, the Michael Moore one is the best.

  • J.G. | November 4, 2012 4:47 PM

    Why do so many people like that new Star Trek movie? I'm not arguing with you particularly, because you are welcome to your opinion, but am I really the only one who thought that Star Trek movie from 2011 was utter and complete un-watchable crap? I couldn't stand it.

  • Star Fan | November 1, 2012 7:20 PMReply

    NO WAY can you put Mark Hammil, Carrie Fischer and Harrison Ford as leads in this movie now. How the hell is that option #1 and "most exciting". Mark Hammil particularly looks awful, none of them CLOSE to what they looked in the 70's when it was first filmed. Seriously?

  • DG | November 1, 2012 6:57 PMReply

    They should let Haneke direct the new trilogy. He's into sci-fi after all

  • neil | February 2, 2013 6:12 AM

    you do realize what aging is right?

  • Neil | February 2, 2013 6:11 AM

    you do realize what aging is right?

  • Yetti Gold | November 1, 2012 9:45 AMReply

    Dear Disney and LucasFilm,

    Congratulations! You now possess the power of the force and with it comes a great deal of responsibility. So here's what you're going to do:

    STEP 1 - you're going to set the new films (Episode 7, 8 and 9) 30 years after episode 6 (Jedi) and you're going to have the FULL original cast back playing themselves as older people. DID YOU HEAR ME? You are going to cast Harrison Ford as Han Freaking solo, Mark Hamill as Luke Skywalker, Carrie Fisher as Leia, Billy Dee Williams as Lando and even Denis Lawson back as Wedge Antilles. HERE'S THE CATCH: THEY DON'T HAVE TO BE THE MAIN CHARACTERS. They are older now and you can use them as side characters revolving around NEW lead characters. We don't care what new characters take over leading roles but you HAVE to bring back the old cast for this all to be LEGIT and to come FULL circle. PLEASE don't cast new actors in these roles and don't CGI faces to make them look like the actors 30 years ago (Like in Tron Legacy) PLEASE!!! You can even kill them off in the first scene, just don't replace them.

    STEP 2 - DON'T LISTEN TO ANYTHING GEORGE LUCAS SAYS! You paid him $4 Billion so tell him to shut up take his money and go make Radioland Murders Part 2! Put somebody in charge of directing who knows what we want. WE WANT EMPIRE STRIKES BACK ON CRACK. That means ACTING, ACTING, ACTING, ACTING, CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT, DRAMA, DEATH!!!!!

    STEP 3 - Whatever you did to make AVENGERS as good as it was, do the same for STAR WARS! I feel the force is strong with you and your company can pull this off. The prequels were the worst films EVER MADE! They showed us just how evil the dark side of the force can be when it seduced George Lucas and took over his ability to distinguish right from wrong! Please redeem the Star Wars Universe. DO OR DO NOT...THERE IS NO TRY

    Sincerely,

    Geeks

  • Dan M | November 3, 2012 10:43 PM

    I hope that the opinion of "geeks" like you is never once considered by Disney. Your comment that the prequels were "the worst films EVER MADE!" is probably the most ridiculous film evaluation ever made, one made no less stupid by the fact that it's repeated ad nauseum by melodramatic geeks like you.

  • keith | November 1, 2012 9:29 AMReply

    I love the idea of telling the story of Yoda! I don't think going into the future after Return Of The Jedi sounds too interesting no matter what they do.

  • Kim | November 1, 2012 8:51 AMReply

    I always thought it would be a cool story to tell about how the lightsaber was invented. That and the Jedi order's history would be neat. Maybe that's more book type stuff, but I haven't read any of the books or multitude of media out there, which maybe explains it.

  • triguous | October 31, 2012 10:14 PMReply

    I'd like to see the new trilogy tell the story of the adult twin children of Han and Leia. One a man, the other a woman, one's arc mirroring Luke's path, the other's mirroring Anakin's path (just not as shitty) & with a new central villain.

  • Connor | October 31, 2012 7:06 PMReply

    Agreed. Option 4 seems like the most logical step to take with the franchise.

  • matt | October 31, 2012 4:17 PMReply

    I like option #4 the best

  • OverHere | October 31, 2012 11:41 AMReply

    The only option is direct sequels with the children of Han, Leia, and Luke. There's a powerful bit of storytelling in there, where you have the children of these heroes having to rise up to save the universe.

  • Sandoucheky | October 31, 2012 6:03 PM

    LOL NERD

  • bastila | October 31, 2012 11:04 AMReply

    Billie Dean Williams? Seriously? Am I missing an in-joke here?

  • jason | October 31, 2012 12:05 PM

    god fucking dammit, playlist.

  • Jeremy | October 31, 2012 11:51 AM

    Lol thought it was just me.

  • spassky | October 31, 2012 11:25 AM

    Thank you. Agreed. Indiewire just jettisoned their geek cred with that one.

Email Updates