Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

5 Things You May Not Know About 'Return Of The Jedi' & How It Could Have Been Much Cooler

Features
by Drew Taylor
May 24, 2013 1:57 PM
25 Comments
  • |

Yoda
No Yoda
Some fascinating "Star Wars"-related documents that were recently released showed that Lucas’ original conception of the Force, even going into ‘Return of the Jedi,’ was that it was something that any mortal could tap into. “Like yoga,” Lucas explained, some people were just better at utilizing that ability than others. (Clearly Lucas changed his mind; in the prequels it’s treated more like a blood disorder than a spiritual ability.) This is a pretty interesting detail, and leads to the larger issue of Yoda in the third film. Originally, Luke was not going to make the return trip to Dagobah, and in pure narrative terms, it makes very little sense that he would break away from the chaos erupting across the galaxy to commune with a little green Muppet. If Yoda wasn’t a part of ‘Jedi,’ it would have deepened the mystery to the character and suggested, as Lucas did previously, that Luke had already tapped into his yoga-like Force abilities; he didn’t need his old master and he was ready to kick ass all on his own. At the time though, director Richard Marquand fought for its inclusion, stressing that “that audiences would feel cheated if there was no scene with Yoda because the importance of Luke's return to Yoda to complete his training.” Lucas also felt that Yoda needed to reiterate that Darth Vader was, in fact, Luke’s father, because he consulted with a child psychologist who deemed that children thinking that Vader had lied to Luke could be potentially damaging. Because filmmakers should obviously take script notes from head-shrinkers.

David Lynch
Directed By… David Lynch?
Eventual 'Jedi' director Richard Marquand did a workmanlike job on the film, juggling complex visual effects, multiple storylines and the constant creative interference by George Lucas. But the movie could have gone down an entirely different path, directorially, one that would have been much, much more interesting. Lucas’ first choice for the gig was David Lynch, who had just come off the critical and commercial success of “The Elephant Man.” Lynch, who would go on to make his own space saga in the wildly divisive “Dune,” recounted the meeting in 2010. “I was asked by George to talk to him about directing ‘Return of the Jedi.’ I had next to zero interest, but I always admired George. He’s a guy who does what he loves. And I do what I love,” Lynch said. “The difference is what George loves makes hundreds of millions of dollars.” 

Lynch was issued a special key and given a map, and when he went to Lucas’ office he was shown illustrations of “Wookies” (probably Ewoks) and “other creatures,” which gave Lynch a headache. Lucas then took Lynch for a joyride in his Ferrari and they ate a restaurant that exclusively sold salads. “That’s when I got almost a migraine headache, and I could hardly wait to get home,” Lynch said. The director then “crawled into a phone booth” and called his agent, telling him, “No way can I do this. No way!” Lynch felt that Lucas should direct it and officially took himself out of the running the following day. Lucas had also offered the job to David Cronenberg, who noted: “Then it was called ‘Revenge of the Jedi.’”

Do you think these additions, changes, or substitutions would have actually made "Return of the Jedi" cooler? Do you enjoy ‘Jedi’ more as a fascinating game of what-if than an actual movie? Sound off below, and may the Force be with you. 

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

25 Comments

  • Griefo | May 27, 2013 6:45 PMReply

    When Lynch Met Lucas - http://vimeo.com/52553756

  • Scully | May 25, 2013 7:23 PMReply

    So do a rewrite, Drew, produce it and put in the theaters.

  • nightgoat72 | May 24, 2013 8:24 PMReply

    Those would not have been cooler at all. "Cooler" like all the dull, depressing post-Nolan Hollywood cinema these days, more like. Why does everyone equate joy, fun, and triumph with "uncool" these days? How fucking hipster.

  • nightgoat72 | May 26, 2013 7:57 PM

    That doesn't even make sense. I'm saying this article is hipster, not the movies.

  • BB1970 | May 25, 2013 2:01 PM

    So, by your definition, as Empire has a downbeat ending, it's "hipster"?
    I guess you're cinema preferences don't go further than an episode of Barney the Purple Dinosaur.

  • BB1970 | May 25, 2013 2:01 PM

    So, by your definition, as Empire has a downbeat ending, it's "hipster"?
    I guess you're cinema preferences don't go further than an episode of Barney the Purple Dinosaur.

  • BB1970 | May 25, 2013 2:01 PM

    So, by your definition, as Empire has a downbeat ending, it's "hipster"?
    I guess you're cinema preferences don't go further than an episode of Barney the Purple Dinosaur.

  • JD | May 24, 2013 6:32 PMReply

    1. The Ewoks were not space lizards. They were originally going to be Wookies. IT'S RIGHT THERE IN THE DAVID LYNCH QOUTE. In Lucas's first treatment for Star Wars, he had the Empire's ground forces fighting Wookies while the Rebels attacked the Death Star. It's also the reason for the Wookie battle in Revenge Of The Sith. During pre-production Lucas concluded they wouldn't be able to find enough tall people to play Wookies, but he already knew a lot of midget and dwarf performers from making the first two Star Wars films. So he, in his words, "Cut the Wookies in half and called them Ewoks." (There's a hint of the original concept in the final film when Chewbacca, along with two Ewoks, swings onto the Walker and takes over the controls.)

    (Also: the Ewoks are the Viet Cong. The Rebels are also the Viet Cong, but most people didn't get it. Remember that Lucas and John Milius came up with the original story for APOCALYPSE NOW.)

    2. Those Gary Kurtz qoutes have long ago been thoroughly exposed as having very little to with reality. Kurtz was remembering most of it wrong and making up the rest. His garbled descriptions of various chapters where Leia is queen of the universe and Luke's kids are turning to the dark side or whatever have no confirmation from anyone else connected to the original Star Wars trilogy.

    3. That being said, I would have liked to have seen David Lynch or David Cronenberg's vision of a Star Wars movie.

  • Starway2001 | May 24, 2013 5:30 PMReply

    Wow, this article is just dripping in contempt.

  • Starway2001 | May 24, 2013 5:30 PMReply

    Wow, this article is just dripping in contempt.

  • Starway2001 | May 24, 2013 5:30 PMReply

    Wow, this article is just dripping in contempt.

  • jojo | May 24, 2013 4:30 PMReply

    the first film's* ending

  • Jojo | May 24, 2013 4:29 PMReply

    Return of the Jedi does suffer from tonal inconsistency, not just relative to the other movies, but in the movie itself.

    Maybe.. No sentient life on the planet Endor. The Empire chooses it because it is remote and has no sentient life, so no hassle. The Rebels launch a ground force led by Han Solo, while Leia remains with Ackbar. Han leads a badass true-to-life combat scenario on the ground with actual rebel troops with real faces and emotions, risking their lives big time for the cause we've been following for three movies. He repays Leia's devotion by leading a successful and awesome badass battle, and instead of being weirdly emasculated, instead segways from rogue to hero by showing how far he's come as a leader. The film ends not with a teddy bear jamboree, but with a scene reminiscent of the first ending, not with the principal characters dancing to jub-jub, but with Leia ready to piece things back together in the galaxy with General Solo by her side as the Rebel Alliance celebrates. And Luke walks into the sunset.

    The on the ground in Endor stuff is what messed the movie up. It's not a bad movie, but it could have been so much better. It's Lucas's baby, so with change in the man, so changes the work, but if he had been as hands off as he had been with Empire and let the people who made that movie excel work their magic here.. who knows?

  • daniel | May 24, 2013 3:48 PMReply

    Revenge of the Jedi:
    1) Luke and Liea go to save Han. When they get to Jabba's palace, Boba Fett calls Vader and says "Hey buddy. Just like you thought, your son showed up to save his friend, so come get him, which is pretty much what you spent all of Empire trying to do, and this is a trap."
    2) Vader and the Empire attack, blowing the hell out of everything to get at Luke, including Jabba. As a bonus, Jabba is an actual character played by a person, not a huge, crummy puppet.
    3) Leia and Han escape, but only by Luke using some Dark Sideish choking action on say, Boba Fett. Leia sees this, Han doesn't, they just barely get away, but Luke is captured by Vader.
    4) Han and Leia, are now the defacto leaders of the Rebellion. Han wants to save his best friend Luke from Vader, Leia wants to defeat the Emperor and save the galaxy.
    5) Vader says "Hey Luke, the Emperor is going to kill your friends. He also knows, just like i said in Empire, that you can kill him. So why don't you do that, and you save Han and Leia, and we rule the blah blah as father et cetera."
    6) Luke kills the Emperor, now totally falling down the dark path.
    7) Vader is totally pumped, and now rules the Empire.
    8) Now Leia, Han and the Rebels have no choice but take the fight to the Empire, and maybe save Luke in the process. Liea expresses serious doubts: he's changed. Han: he's my best friend, I have to save him.
    9) the Rebels attack, and Vader says "Luke, I've totally reconsidered the not-killing-your-friends idea at this point."
    10) Luke tries to make things right, and has to make the choice between saving Han or saving Leia. He saves Leia, and gets to Han just in time to see him fighting Vader.
    11) Vader kills Han in front of Luke, an echo of him killing Obi Wan in front of him. Leia heart breaks in half, Luke freaks out, attacks Vader. Han, dying, uses the Force to do one small but emotionally resonant thing -- something that helps Luke fight him.
    12) Luke kills Vader, destroying the symbol of his own self-doubt, the Rebels are saved. But his best friend is dead, and Leia in total Guinevere form, can never be with Luke (and hells no they arent brother and sister for christs sake). She goes off to live in sadness, leaving Lando , who has governed things before, to run the new Republic.
    13) Luke, brokenhearted, walks off into the twin sunset of the desert -- just like Obi Wan Kenobi did after he blew it.
    14) Everybody cries, sees the movie six times.

    to quote William Hurt in History of Violence: "HOW DO YOU &$%%# THAT UP??"

  • That Kid | May 24, 2013 9:37 PM

    If only we could return to 1983...

  • Sean | May 24, 2013 3:45 PMReply

    Also I think that the death of Han Solo would have either clouded or been diminished by the deaths of Yoda and Vadar.

  • Sean | May 24, 2013 3:41 PMReply

    These 5 fact articles are usually without opinion and bias, but it seems as though Drew decided that this one needed his critical and important input.

  • swell | May 24, 2013 3:21 PMReply

    Kevin, send Drew a nice christmas present this year... after his recent run, it appears the site has a new lead dickbag to hammer on.

  • Bender | May 24, 2013 2:57 PMReply

    5 more ways to nag about something that is allready perfect the way it is!

  • Dan S | May 24, 2013 3:25 PM

    Sure, it's "perfect." That's why Lucas has made alterations to it since it was originally released.

  • Steve | May 24, 2013 2:55 PMReply

    Dang i saw that movie seven times when it came out, they must have done something right!!
    Also guys in lizards suits would have looked worse!!!

  • Matt | May 24, 2013 2:48 PMReply

    Yes, David Lynch directing Jedi would have been interesting. However, it would have also been a disaster.

  • YO DUH | May 24, 2013 2:43 PMReply

    Uh, you already shat on Jedi earlier. Once per day not doin' it for you anymore?

  • James | May 24, 2013 2:30 PMReply

    I've also read in multiple places that Lucas wanted Spielberg to direct "Jedi". However the fact that Lucas makes his films non-union/outside the DGA made that impossible.

  • David | May 24, 2013 2:26 PMReply

    Janet Leigh dies in psycho?you spoiling bastards!maybe Lucas could go back and fuck with that movie aswell

Email Updates