One fair minded citizen wrote on here
People don't want historical accuracy, they want actors
Make the sequel already! Desperate for
It now. First one was great, I'm sure this one will be
I've seen 82. Some pretty interesting choices, and even more interesting exclusions. No In the
Actually, it's anti-feminists who deserve to be suspected of fascism, no matter what Rush
where is the trailer? I just see some images
Not only the casting is screwed up and inaccurate, but the movie looks corny.This is a 100 million
not like this list is of any significance. but i won't give them 5 extra page loads to read it.
Well said! Let the movie be focused on the story vs historical accuracies. There are no movies that
I am indifferent to what people are calling white washing or the cast. This is a moot point to me.
Tyler Perry's hairline sure looks hard and fake. better get some CGI on that, might ruin the
Great question. Having seen both, I'd have to say Keaton was the better of the two. Both are
Clockwork Orange seems even MORE odd.
Orgazmo maybe for how NOT to write a comedy.
The fundamental problem with this statement is that this never happens to white people. Are we going
She forgot mutliple immaculate insert shots.
I respect Scott, and I genuinely hope that this is a good movie. But Christian Bale's GQ ready
Leonardo DiCaprio is one of the best actor in Hollywood in my personal opinion. He is the style icon
Eyes Wide Shut seems like an odd inclusion until you remember the scenes in the costume shop with
Why should real African history be hijacked with non-historic myths ending with a foul George
Ridley Scott is full of it with a sh before it
Any fool with an internet connection can see what