- By Todd Gilchrist
- |
- March 27, 2013 12:56 PM
- |
- 1 Comment
It’s tough to say if I would be as generous with my praise of “G.I. Joe: Retaliation” if I weren’t such a big fan of its director, Jon M. Chu, but given the mechanical one-dimensionality of most big-budget franchise films, the sequel earns its critical bona fides simply by being made by a director who has sincere affection for the source material. Although its delay from the summer of 2012 to spring 2013 spawned rumors of a troubled production, extensive reshoots, and a last-minute effort to squeeze the now-hot Channing Tatum into more scenes, Chu’s follow-up is remarkably cohesive – a fun, sweeping and yet understated sequel that should whet the appetites of action fans without overdosing them on pop confectionaries before the summer buffet truly starts.
Recent Comments
Marvel is destroying DC. As a kid growing up I loved all of the DC characters more than Marvel. But
Whoa whoa whoa, no mention of Vincent Gallo and Angelica Huston on the set of Buffalo '66??
Since you maintain that MOS introduced the terraforming as an ELE (rightfully so), I would love
Get full album for free here: zippyshare.com/v/54354406/file.html
I think those who appreciate the compassionate spirit and/or know the humbling history of
Yeah, I found that comparison to Django to be particularly clueless & I haven't even seen
VKATNYTE, So are you just gonna bitch out everyone who doesn't agree with you? You are about as
I'd really appreciate it if those of you who haven't seen the film would please not
I listened to this podcast - in double time - so I missed this part: "the film is 75 per cent
No one is bothered because it makes sense to this film. Obviously it would've been out of place