- By Drew Taylor
- |
- November 13, 2012 1:44 PM
- |
- 50 Comments
Steven Spielberg directing a biopic on Abraham Lincoln, even one that concerns the President's last four months in his second term, is something that positively oozes with endless possibilities. This is, after all, a filmmaker who has turned his virtuosic eye onto past historical injustices like the Holocaust ("Schindler's List") and the aftermath of the Munich Olympics massacre ("Munich"), who has always had a keen interest in the African American experience ("The Color Purple," "Amistad"). Imagine what he could do with the actual Civil War! Well, it turns out, very little. "Lincoln," for all its technical accomplishment, fine performances, and intricate script work, is something of a lifeless bore. It's in desperate need and short supply of the very Spielberg-ian dazzle that it was assumed he would bring to the project.
Recent Comments
R.I.P. - J.G. >>> He didn't starr in "Hemingway & Gellhorn" but in
Writing this off as "mommy porn" is so easy. Just another label for something that has
The CinemaScore was A-, so "the people" liked it. The critics, I think, canonized
Armie Hammer - Respect +
Oh boy, so I guess it's another lame Adam Sandler film that will also star whatever lame
"And to that Alan B, who suggested I am trying to "brush off slavery," are you
this is fucking horrible, ruined my day. thinking of him singing "dirty work" fucking
The entire movie I could tell that they were going to have superman kill zod in the end, what
The entire movie I could tell that they were going to have superman kill zod in the end, what
If superman didnt kill zoid then he would continue killing becuase it's not like zoid could be