- By Jessica Kiang
- |
- September 1, 2012 11:52 AM
- |
- 3 Comments
“Parade’s End” has already proven divisive. It’s been widely praised by the punditry, but many viewers have expressed frustration with its wilfully muddled structure (apparently a hangover from the even more chronologically confusing books), in which events separated by years and sometimes countries crash together as though occupying contiguous spaces. It doesn’t help, say these critics, that these events then unfold with a minimum of helpful backstory, and little contextualisation, so we drop in mid-conversation or catch mere glimpses of relevant newspaper headlines or have to tell simply by the fact that this minor character is talking to this other minor character, that Something Is Up. It’s challenging for the viewer, and within the genre of the costume drama, which is frequently reduced to who-is-shagging-whom-oh-look-at-that-pretty-hat throughlines, that can be offputting.
Recent Comments
The thing I like about DC heroes, including Superman, Batman and the Justice League, is their
These still frames are fantastic. Ejiofor reflects pure agony.
So... it´s the same movie we have already saw 500 times (the awkward, silly and naive chosen one,
was pretty excited about a new dc universin for film and potential justice league, after watching
Really interesting Ken, thanksâ!â I think that you would be really interested in some recent
FFS, Zod committed suicide by Superman.
"Has the author of this post even researched the movie?" Of course, you , Mason, know
Get over it. This is a remake of Solomon Northup's story. McQueen isn't even the first
Oh, and you know all 300,000,000 of us Americans? And where are you from? Possibly one of the
Totally dissapointed by this. Could have been great but instead was obnoxious CGI garbage. I guess