- By Kevin Jagernauth
- |
- May 19, 2011 12:22 PM
- |
- 14 Comments
Why is "Drive" -- a seemingly trivial affair about a stuntman and part-time getaway driver, played by Ryan Gosling, pulled into deep and bloody waters on the neon-and-streetlight lit streets of L.A. -- even at Cannes, let alone in competition? It's not merely because of the bloody-but-brilliant background of director Nicolas Winding Refn, whose films (the "Pusher" trilogy, "Bronson," "Valhalla Rising") have demonstrated both an eye for composition and a taste for the jugular. It's not merely because of the film's cinematic roots, with the production seemingly crafted as a clear tribute to '80s-era Michael Mann and other synthesizer-and-faux-leather action-crime stories. Rather, you can make a case that "Drive" is here because action cinema and genre cinema are too important -- and too exciting, enthralling and, yes, artful when well made -- to be merely dismissed as suitable only for hacks to make and dolts to watch. French enthusiasm for American crime cinema from the '40s and '50s gave us the vocabulary and value set to truly appreciate film noir -- and anyone who can truly appreciate film noir will appreciate "Drive."
Recent Comments
@JSNPAVA: I wasn't a huge fan of Thor as a whole, but I think Thor's general character arc
LOL.
I read it and it was dull. Had no idea so much was based off of Harry Potter/Buffy until
Does anyone else think this sounds remarkably close to jj's answer before he accepted the job?
you contradict yourself alot especially with michael shannon criticism you say he had a deep rooted
And let me get this clear: you STILL wrote that it was a "stunning show of bad taste" for
I apologise. I assumed that people at The Playlist had different opinions. It turns out many have
Congratulations! I didn't write that part.
The movie was lacking any sort of real estate scheme by Lex Luthor and is therefore terrible.
Christ, my post had NOTHING to do with comics. In fact, the ONLY comic that featured in my post was