5 Doomed Romance Leonardo DiCaprio Movi ...
Wes Anderson's 5 Best Commercials
Can 'World War Z' Break Even?
Steve Soderbergh On Cinema, Studios, Mor ...
Recap: 'The King Of Comedy' 30th Anniversary ...
Excl: Lake Bell Joins 'Million Dollar Ar ...
10 Essential Cinematic Antiheroes
![]()
The LA Times reports that talks are underway between CW and the reps for the Hollywood version of "Battle Royale" to bring the movie to the small screen in an English-language show. In case you're not aware, "Battle Royale" -- which came well before Suzanne Collins' books or the subsequent movies -- tells the story of forty-two school children who are brought to an island and are entered in a three-day fight for survival where only one person emerges victorious. Sound familiar?
The idea of an American remake of this property always seemed a bit ludicrous, if only given that the outrageous, no-holds-barred nature of the original simply wouldn't fly (or would be lost in translation) at a major studio, let alone a TV network that counts "Gossip Girl," "Vampire Diaries" and "Dr. Drew's Lifechangers" among its programming. But before fans of Kinji Fukasaku's film get too up in arms, apparently the original author of "Battle Royale," Koushun Takami, who wrote the book on which the film is based, has to give his approval before any of this can happen. But with the project in various forms of development since 2006 when New Line snatched the rights, clearly suits still want to see this happen.
So, we'll see how this turns out, but CW is hedging their bets with the similarly-themed "The Selection" also brewing as a potential new show on the network. So either way, you're getting a kids-hunting-kids TV show on the CW probably at some point in the near future. Hooray!
6 Comments
jon | August 5, 2012 12:41 AM
It should be made by HBO or Showtime. Putting it on the CW will only make it suck. Battle Royals is far superior to Hunger Games. Most people who like hunger games more never read the battle royale novel, which came out before the movie. You get a background story of almost everyone student. Its much better than the movie. Which is why it would make a great Tv show. They could focus on characters backgrounds. Something the hunger games didn't really do. It manily focused on Katniss.
Arch | July 27, 2012 2:12 PM
If people keep talking about Battle Royal when talking about Hunger games, I might end up seeing this Hunger game thingy ! That said there's just no way a CW TV show could reach half the nihilistic/depressive atmosphere of the movie original. They clearly want to grab that "franchise" and turn it into a Hunger games rip-off... again, specially now that everybody has heard about Battle royal.
Alish | July 27, 2012 12:07 AM
I prefer BR but you two share a valid point.
A. | July 26, 2012 8:12 PM
I prefer The Hunger Games....I cared more for the characters and the story was far more interesting to me. Also, Jennifer Lawrence kicked ass as Katniss Everdeen.
alish | July 26, 2012 7:01 PM
Did anybody like HG more than BR?