Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Counterpoint Review: 'Tron: Legacy' Is A Masterclass In Poor Storytelling

by Gabe Toro
December 9, 2010 5:03 AM
15 Comments
  • |


We ran our first review "Tron: Legacy" yesterday, here's another take on the film.

Tron: Legacy” begins with Sam Flynn (Garrett Hedlund), who has no real character traits that exist outside of a Hollywood pitch meeting. He skydives and motorcycles and hates authority, and occasionally says things like, “It’s on” or “This isn’t happening” or “You have to trust me!” He’s a millionaire, but by choice, he lives alone, with a dog, in a moody garage by the river.

He inherited Encom from his father, Kevin Flynn (you may remember him from “Tron,” but probably not), but he’s ceded the company to Bruce Boxleitner since he feels bad that Boxleitner hasn’t been in a respectable film in about two decades. In kind, Boxleitner has let a bunch of buzzword-savvy yuppies undermine his own authority by daring to make decisions like creating software and not giving it away. But Boxleitner need not worry, since the most important event in the film is about to happen to him: his beeper’s about to vibrate.


Perhaps because he’s holding out hope that Kevin (Jeff Bridges) isn’t dead after his mysterious disappearance of ’89 (or because he’s always been in love with Kevin -- it’s just really hard to explain what a beeper is doing in this movie), Boxleitner interrupts Sam’s Pop-A-Wheelie-Against-The-Man routine to give him the news: the page came from inside Flynn’s Arcade. See, Kevin was a tech genius, but that emerged from being a gaming nut, a gateway drug that led him to conquer, and then lose himself, in his own tech world. Which partially explains paging Bruce Boxleitner.

Sam takes a break from flipping off Big Business to investigate, finding in the dusty arcade the ability to jump into the world his father created twentysomething years ago. He immediately arrives in the middle of “the grid” that creepy young CGI Kevin described to his son before his disappearance. It’s a terrifying place, where beautiful women strip his clothes off, people fight each other with glowing Frisbees, a Bowie/Chaplin/Brundlefly combo runs the Party District and, no matter where you are, Daft Punk is always jamming out. “Tron” director Steven Lisberger seemed like he was trying to warn the world about tech-based thinking, but Joseph Kosinski seems like he’s as big a videogame fan as the elder Flynn himself. Less Godard, more Galaga.

So this gaming world seems pretty neat, until Sam realizes that his dad created an Avatar™ that has developed a mind of its own. Apparently he intends to hold endless Frisbee gladiator matches and motorcycle races with “programs” designed to look and act like people. This doesn’t seem very evil until he tries to kill Sam. Though this Kevin-alike, named C.L.U., seems to have control of an entire army (of sports fans) at his disposal, he selects the method least likely to kill the protagonist of any movie: death by motorcycle race!

Sam escapes thanks to Olivia Wilde, who seems to be playing… well, what is she? She takes Sam to Kevin, who now looks like a blissed out, potheaded Obi-Wan Kenobi. He drops some science on his son for no discernible reason if only to excuse the seeming randomness of this world, before telling him that he created Olivia Wilde. Good job, Pothead Obi-Wan. She reads Jules Verne and looks good in leather, but when Sam says he dropped out of college, she can’t stop laughing. She celebrates more than a few things inappropriately, seems confused about human emotions, and asks Sam, idly, what the Sun is like, and how to explain it.

After dinner in the computer world (where did they get a roasted pig?) Sam says he wants to make a dash back to society. There’s a timetable, so he has to rush, and he wants Dad to come with him. Dad wants to bring Olivia Wilde. Can you blame him? But again… what is she? Is she machine? Is she a computer program? Is she human? Kevin seems super proud of creating her, and reveals she’s got some sort of Unobtanium™ in her or something but… what exactly has he been doing with her for twentysomething years? Dad creates Babeotron 2000 and lives alone with her, off the grid, until she grows into a full figured woman. And then Dad smiles when Sam and Olivia Wilde grow close. It’s a Freudian nightmare is what we’re trying to say.

And then Kevin drops the bombshell -- he didn’t send that page. Because it’s 2010, no one knows how to send a page anymore. Especially not to Bruce Boxleitner. And thus, the plot point the year’s biggest movie hinges on -- our villain has spent two decades trying to find his enemy in the computer world, only to place his hopes on the genius plan of sending Bruce Boxleitner a page. In 2010. That way, Sam would answer it, go to his dad, and bring his father out of hiding. You wonder if that guy who unleashed snakes on a commercial flight that one time thought of this.

At this point, the action kicks into high gear. Which means a couple of white people inexplicably bust out kung fu moves against an army of Daft Punks, an old mentor figure with limitless ability quite literally does an extended Obi-Wan impersonation, and the audience realizes that this is a world of pitch black darkness with only three primary neon colors, meaning you can kiss your chance to see any more interesting visuals goodbye. Waves upon waves of villains attack, but they’re dressed pretty much exactly the same. Oh, and Tron shows up. You know, the title character. Still not sure who he is, or what he does, or how he alters the final outcome. Perhaps we’ll look for some “Tron: Legacy” spoilers regarding Tron in the original “Tron.”

Speaking of spoilers, we were going to be cruel and spoil the end, but we don’t really know what happens. There’s a big laser show, and everything kind of melts into each other, and it’s a lot like looking into a lava lamp. We think the hero won, but maybe the villain did. The heroes wear blue, so we thought we were in the clear, until we realized both sides have characters that look and sound a lot like that guy from “Starman.” Maybe you’re supposed to find out in the spinoff cartoon, or a sequel, or a webisode or something. We should probably just blow up Bruce Boxleitner’s beeper, see if he knows. [D]

  • |

More: Films, Review, Tron: Legacy

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

15 Comments

  • Gemma | January 6, 2011 3:36 AMReply

    Interesting review...felt like a lot of whining but whatever. For those of you who haven't seen this movie I have to say it was entertaining, though nothing to be completely enthralled by...the visual effects and score were awesome and completely worth seeing in theaters.

    *Also, I was totally wondered the same thing 'goldfarb'...who was taking care of that dog!?

  • Simon | December 16, 2010 10:45 AMReply

    I for one think the review is both funny and spot on. The plot makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, and anyone who calls spoiler on this is probably the same guys who were like "Jesus dies in Passion of the Christ, SPOILER ALERT!!"

  • goldfarb | December 10, 2010 9:57 AMReply

    the one aspect of the film that I really wanted to know about was...who took care of his dog?

    oh and as for the quality of the review - yeah it's bad...but you've given us the spot-on "Sam’s Pop-A-Wheelie-Against-The-Man routine..." line...so thanks.

  • Kathleen Walsh | December 10, 2010 2:34 AMReply

    Gabe: my knight in shining armor, swoon!

    T19: How meta is it that you're reviewing my review of a comment on a review. What movie are we talking about anyway?!?!?!

  • Gabe Toro | December 10, 2010 12:59 AMReply

    If any of you had seen the movie, you'd realize I didn't spoil anything that wasn't evident in the first five minutes of the film. Or even the marketing. And to think, re: spoilers... if you can "spoil" a movie like "Tron Legacy," truly a visual experience and nothing more, then why bother even going to the movies in the first place?

    And T19, clean up your act, that's no way to talk to such a sweet lady.

  • T19 | December 10, 2010 12:45 AMReply

    Kathleen, fuck off. This IS a bad review. No one is hurt over Gabe's comedy routine featuring Tron spoilers, but if this site and it's writers take bad films to task, then so should the writing staff be called all out for bad reviews. I don't doubt you found it entertaining, because the entire thing was a desperate attempt to be snarky, self-important and above-it-all cool. What it didn't do was actually review the film. This was just lazy...and to think the headline calls the film a masterclass in poor storytelling when this review is a masterclass in how not to give a worthwhile film review.

  • Kathleen Walsh | December 10, 2010 12:31 AMReply

    Wow, people get REALLY mad about spoilers huh? It's a damn movie review, everything else is going to be spoiled for you beyond the end if you read to the end. Gabe, I found this review highly entertaining. Keep on fighting the good fight.

  • Aaron G | December 9, 2010 10:31 AMReply

    you're REALLY butthurt over people rightfully calling you out on this "review"? "whaaa, why don't you guys just tell me what to write"? really? why don't you actually WRITE A REVIEW OF THE MOVIE instead of this spoilerific synopsis of the entire plot?

    grow up and be a fucking man, toro. "whaa, i hate this movie, so i'm gonna ruin it for everyone else, whaaaaa." fucking bitch. it's bad enough you can't write an actual review (why don't you spend a few hours reading other movie critics so you can get an idea of what a movie review is) but then you have to ruin it for others by spoiling the movie. people like you just make me fucking sick and i'm tired of this kind of crap. you're just as bad as the assholes who talk in the movie theaters and act like general spoilt brats.

  • Jake | December 9, 2010 10:20 AMReply

    Gabe, disliking the film and giving it a pan is one thing, but the manner in which this review is constructed is both condescending and snarky as hell. It's an easy way out and equally lazy display of writing, especially considering the review that your piece serves as a counterpoint to. By no means is it effusive praise, but it at least takes the time to articulate their feelings on it without resorting to hyperbolic displays of pseudo-criticism.

    I'm a regular reader of this site, /Film, Ain't It Cool and Hollywood Elsewhere. To me, this site's a great middle ground of the fanboy-centric news that you'll see on /Film or AICN, with stronger commentary and the more high-brow musings of Jeff Wells' site. When I read the blustery, rage-induced things you post in those talkbacks, it feels like a put-on. Here also, it feels like a put-on.

    You're obviously successful enough and have a strong point of view to not care or listen to my half-assed lecture, but all I'm saying is that while this type of review may generate knee-jerk discussion or some web hits, I feel like you lose a ton of credibility. Be better than that, man.

  • Gabe Toro | December 9, 2010 9:58 AMReply

    I'm sorry. Why don't you guys remind me what I should talk about in regards to this movie.

  • Armando Silva | December 9, 2010 9:52 AMReply

    I've got to be honest, this is a bad review. I don't know if TRON is good or not, but this is just stupid and childish.

  • anon | December 9, 2010 8:18 AMReply

    a 'review' is usually more than sarcastic retelling of plot, asshat.

  • starway2001 | December 9, 2010 7:07 AMReply

    We get it. You hate all things Tron.

  • Alan | December 9, 2010 6:13 AMReply

    WORST REVIEW EVER!

  • gerry c. | December 9, 2010 5:15 AMReply

    Spoiler Alert, dude.

Email Updates