Review: 'Only God Forgives'
5 Doomed Romance Leonardo DiCaprio Movi ...
Wes Anderson's 5 Best Commercials
Can 'World War Z' Break Even?
Steve Soderbergh On Cinema, Studios, Mor ...
Recap: 'The King Of Comedy' 30th Anniversary ...
Excl: Lake Bell Joins 'Million Dollar Ar ...
10 Essential Cinematic Antiheroes"It's not exactly a little, intimate drama. I'm working on 'Avatar 2' and 'Avatar 3.' I was talking the other day with Peter Jackson and said, 'You had it easy dude. You had the books when you did the second and third 'Lord of the Rings.' I have to create my own books in my head and extract a script from it. I'm deep into it and I'm living in Pandora right now," he told Play Goes Strong. "There is that start up torque where you feel it's coming to you. Then you build up momentum. That's when it gets fun. The characters talk and it's writing itself. I'm almost there right now. It's building fast."
"As for a release date, that will be determined by when I get the script out," he adds, saying he doesn't feel the pressure of living up to any expectations.
However, having recently moved to New Zealand where he plans to shoot the sequels, there is still a lot riding on the followups, and not just the fate of a potential mega franchise. Disney is planning a major theme park attraction based on the movie as well, with Cameron said to be directly involved with the Imagineers in bringing it to life. But the $2.7 billion dollar question is: what is the real excitement level for these follow-ups?
Part of the mammoth success of "Avatar" was that it was a once-in-a-lifetime event, a movie that was largely sold on it's technological leaps as much as anything else. And while reviews were mostly positive, one could argue its presence in the pop culture world hasn't quite lasted. While it serves as a shorthand for blockbuster potential, an (anecdotal, anyway) argument could be made that Pandora lunchboxes probably aren't moving as fast as "Star Wars" or "Lord Of The Rings" products, nor does there seem to be as vocal a fanbase as those films either.
But perhaps we're just too far away. Maybe once the sequels become more firmed up, the fanbase will being to firm up and make themselves heard. Or maybe "Avatar" is a phenomenon that would be foolish to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on to try to repeat. What do you think? Can "Avatar" swing back and better than ever? Or should Cameron drop it and move onto something else like his forever-developing "Battle Angel"? [via Bleeding Cool]
16 Comments
Mark | March 19, 2013 3:36 PM
Cameron has already made two of the greatest sequels ever made. Never underestimate him. Can't wait for Avatar 2 and 3.
Aksel | March 19, 2013 6:44 AM
I'm pretty sure that everyone will go see these movies just to appreciate what Cameron has to bring technology-wise.
It's true that the stories that he chooses to tell are not that compelling but the man sure knows how to translate them onto the big screen.
Kiki | March 19, 2013 3:51 AM
I wasn't aware Avatar had a fanbase to begin with. It was one of the worst films I've ever seen and I'm still angry at James Cameron for those three hours of my life I'll never see again. So many great scripts/ideas never make it to the big screen and we're going to get Pocahontas-in-Space-Dressed-Up-Like-Smurfs 2 and 3. Gah.
Get Real | March 19, 2013 3:35 AM
Fuck no.
Glass | March 18, 2013 11:00 PM
The answer is: It doesn't matter what the film blog commenting community thinks about the Avatar squeakquels. For the most part, Avatar was shat upon by them from the time it was even announced, and it still became the biggest movie of all time. I think this will be a slightly-lesser cousin of that situation.
Alan B | March 18, 2013 7:49 PM
Cameron is a GOD. The dude can take original material and turn it into a more viable franchise than a comicbook series, and he's done that repeatedly. The prevailing internet attitude is like "I don't know, I mean he has made the highest grossing film TWICE, but I still don't know about him." Why would anyone - ever - bet against him? Like, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever ...
bohmer | March 18, 2013 7:41 PM
it's so not necessary...but like the fucking hobbit, i'll be there.
WILL | March 18, 2013 5:18 PM
Of course we do, Avatar was fantastic. It was a proper movie.
CB | March 18, 2013 5:03 PM
Sure I'm interested. I'm not gonna pretend that Avatar wasn't a thrilling cinematic experience.
murtada | March 18, 2013 4:38 PM
I don't think we need sequels to that story...