Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Discuss: Can A Good Movie Ever Be Made From A Video Game?

by Oliver Lyttelton
July 12, 2012 11:03 AM
  • |

After a few years that have seen studios deciding to focus on trying to make movies out of board games, it looks, from the last couple of days, as though video games are cycling back around as the hot source material. Monday saw Michael Fassbender announced as the star and producer of a film based on Ubisoft's hugely popular "Assassin's Creed" franchise, while yesterday a movie based on the long-running "Deus Ex" series was set up at CBS Films, Sony's "God Of War" film got new writers, and Dreamworks' "Need For Speed" got a firm 2014 release date.

All this on top of the announcement a month or so back that "Chronicle" director Josh Trank was developing a "Shadow Of The Colossus" film, based on the seminal Playstation 2 game of the same name, and with 3D game-derived horror sequels "Resident Evil: Retribution" and "Silent Hill: Revelation" gearing up for release in the fall, with both films set to unveil footage at Comic-Con. And there are even more projects in development, and all told, it seems games are officially hot again in the movie world.

It's almost brave, given the track record of games-to-movies so far. They have been almost universally critically reviled, with the highest Rotten Tomatoes score to date (for what that's worth) being for 2001's flop CGI feature "Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within," with a less-than-rousing 43%. The biggest worldwide box office hit in the genre was "Prince Of Persia: The Sands Of Time," with $335 million worldwide, and that's a film generally deemed to have been a flop ("Lara Croft: Tomb Raider" is the biggest domestic grosser, with $131 million). Only the surprisingly resilient "Resident Evil" series has managed to sustain a successful franchise -- thanks to a 3D boost, the fourth installment took nearly $300 million worldwide -- but no film in the series has yet taken more than $60 million domestically.

And that's just the top end -- from "Super Mario Brothers" to "Max Payne," there are plenty of movies based on games that died at the box office. So are all these new projects destined to be as badly received and financially disappointing as their predecessors? Can a video game adaptation ever be successful? More importantly, can one ever be good?.

Of course, the two questions probably have more in common than one thinks. While, like all bad movies, the likes of "Hitman" and "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider" have their defenders, they weren't just rejected by fans, but by audiences too -- the sequel to the latter halved its gross for follow-up 'The Cradle Of Life,' suggesting that many of those who saw the first one really, really didn't like it. Without a single film stepping apart from the herd to legitimize the genre, as Richard Donner's "Superman" or Tim Burton's "Batman" did for comic books back in the day, people are justifiably wary of seeing these things.

From our point of view, there's a couple of other major issues that limit video game adaptations from being much good. The first is the nature of the source material. From the emergence of the form in the late 1970s, games have taken serious inspiration from either sports or movies, and it's the latter that has taken particular precedence as the technology has improved. Even the most acclaimed games are generally inspired by movies, rather than something independent -- take Rockstar Studios, who've made billions of dollars from their open world games "Grand Theft Auto," "Red Dead Redemption" and "L.A. Noire." All three are immaculate, detailed games of real artistry, but they're also derivative riffs on, and homages to, the crime movie, the Western, and the detective genre, respectively.

And even selling points, like the bullet-time gimmick of "Max Payne" for instance, might feel fresh in a game, but in that case, and many others, it was something inspired by a movie ("The Matrix"), and when taken back to the big screen, it felt like just another violent cop actioner. This is not to say that Hollywood is a beacon of originality themselves, but aside from the brand name, and perhaps a star they like, the filmgoing audience aren't given any reason that they should go and see the film.     

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    


  • Braedon Lashley | June 1, 2013 3:58 PMReply

    They should make a game from the taken movie because it was a popular movie and the movie had a good mix of hand to hand combat and shooting skill.

  • Kate | July 12, 2012 7:51 PMReply

    I'm a little surprised by the assumptions around the net (and here) that Fassbender's involvement as a producer somehow raises the chances that this will be a quality adaptation. He isn't really "picky" and will do a project for cash. As a fan, I question his ability to spot a good script.

  • Zinjo | July 12, 2012 6:39 PMReply

    I believe it can, but the studios need to grow a pair and expect that even if the gamer fans hate the idea that it won't be faithful to their cherished game, they'll see it anyway if only to be able to trash it online. The game needs to be a starting point. The mine from which all great concepts are derived. DOOM would have been brilliant had they stuck with the cross genre of guys with guns trying to fight demons from Hell! Oh and loosing the gun-cam wouldn't hurt either... They had the opportunity to make "Aliens" with demons and pussied out. Aliens vs Predator (at least #2) was a brilliant cross over, taking place during the time of "Aliens" with 3 simultaneous sub-plots that could have easily been exploited in the film media. Instead we were "treated" to a cheesy gorefest that didn't even rate a good gore-porn... The gaming genre is all about interaction whereas film is about experience. In games you affect the world your character lives in, but in film you experience the voyage of the main character as a third person looking in. What makes a gamer jump, doesn't work on a cinema audience and vice versa. So to bind a screenwriter to the 2 Dimensional writing talents of a game designer is a sure fire recipe for failure and one would think that the Hollywood accountants would realize that by now. Alas, no so far...

  • Aidan Williams | July 12, 2012 6:26 PMReply

    I cant wait to see what Uncharted Drakes Fortune is going to be like, it should be awesome and i cant wait to see which actor is going to play Nathan Drake.

  • Mark | July 12, 2012 1:48 PMReply

    Mortal Kombat: Best Video Game Turned Movie PERIOD!

  • Kyle | July 12, 2012 1:04 PMReply

    What's happening with the Metal Gear Solid film?

  • Marc | July 12, 2012 12:34 PMReply

    Well,if the movie doesn't have the narrative structure of a video game (which is zilch),then it just might work.

  • MAL | July 12, 2012 12:28 PMReply

    Great article! I think your most salient point has to do with gamers not wanting a film version to stray from the source material. But, like books to film, we are talking a different medium and "adaptation" is a requirement of success. I am a fan of the Resident Evil series (one of the few games I played through was RE4) not because of its emotional and intellectual depth nor because it is exactly like the game (as you point out, it is not); rather, the films are relatively well made, I know I will be entertained, and my expectations are midling at best. (Similarly, if I want a really good hamburger, I won't go to McDonald's, but if I want fast, minimalist food to fill a hunger void it's a decent alternative.) I will admit, though, I was a huge fan of the first Silent Hill movie. The imaginative an horrifying world it adapted for film, the unending sense of dread, and the terrific production design overwhelmed (for me anyway) the fact I could not really discern a plot of any logic or weight. I was fascinated by the world in which it immersed me -- plot be damned!

  • Phoenix Wright | July 12, 2012 11:28 AMReply

    Two words: Ace Attorney.

  • Retardos Number 1 Forever | July 12, 2012 11:20 AMReply

    Granted, there has never really been one that worked on the big screen, but an argument can certainly be made that some games are as engrossing and ultimately more rewarding than some blockbuster hits. Take the game you mentioned, "Red Dead Redemption", it's storyline is strong and the gameplay and design are both stunning despite carrying heavy inspiration from westerns of old, and in the long run, there's an emotional payoff. I'd take that over watching another Transformers any day of the week. I do understand the argument though, and I agree - but maybe it's better to just leave the good games alone just as gamers pray that the good movies get left alone (because heaven knows games adapted from movies are equally terribly).

  • lookf4r | July 12, 2012 11:15 AMReply

    All video game movies suck because all the directors and writers have sucked. When someone with talent cares to make one of these films it will be good.

  • Benjamin Wright | July 12, 2012 11:14 AMReply

    Seriously, "Super Mario Bros." and "Street Fighter" were like my favorite movies when I was 5. I still watch them sometimes as well...

Email Updates