He continues "You want to have a temper tantrum. You want to just say, from time to time, like, 'I've fucking had it.' But you can't say that because everyone really is counting on you to get them up that hill." Perhaps cautious that David O Russell, who's had a famous on-set blow-up or two, is in the room (Russell responds with good humor, wryly saying, "Speak for yourself, Quentin," when the director tells the room, "We all get frustrated"), the moderator asks if Tarantino ever has had a tantrum. "I haven't had a temper tantrum," the director responds, "not yet. You know, it's like, I can't really have a temper tantrum and still be a boss that's respected, at least as far as I'm concerned. But, you know, at some point, though, people got to know that there's a penalty for fucking up."
2. Tarantino didn't want a three-hour "Django Unchained" either.
Stories of post-production on "Django Unchained" have detailed a desperate battle to cut the film down to a 2 hour 45 minute running time, with some suggesting that Harvey Weinstein was pressuring Tarantino to edit the picture. The director totally denies the charge saying, "If he treated me that way, I wouldn't be working with him for twenty years."
He also suggests that he wants a shorter film too, but that it just takes some time to make it work, normally with a test screening involved. "I didn't want a three-hour movie, either. When you're cutting it down, at that moment in time, before you watch it with an audience, you know it's too long, but you can't imagine taking anything out. So then you watch it with an audience, and then all of a sudden -- 'Oh, wow, that is kind of boring now!' or 'No, this is not as suspenseful by the time we got to it as it needs to be.' But you can only go so far in the Avid room on your own. At some point, you have to watch it with an audience... And then you watch the movie and 15 minutes are gone by noon the next day!"
Again, QT isn't known for self-doubt, but when asked if he ever feared he'd never make it, he did have with an uncharacteristically vulnerable response. "I didn't entertain that thought [of failure]," he said. "If I did, I'd probably own a video store right now, and it'd be out of business right now, and I don't know what the hell I'd be doing. I just figured I couldn't have a fallback plan, 'cause I couldn't allow myself to fall back. All or nothing. There's directing and there's wanting to direct without ever having directed before, and they're two different dudes. And the thing about wanting to be a director, and wanting this to be your artform... Aside from getting a 16mm camera, or Super 8 camera, and making something, which is definitely within your power, and even more within people's power now, to test out these theories. But in the '80s, when I was a young guy, there was no proof of it at all. You could act, and see if there's something there. If you want to write, you can get a piece of paper, and see if there's something there. But if you want to direct, actually direct a feature film, and you've never done anything, it's all theory. So at 3 in the morning, from time to time, you wonder 'Is this a mistake?' You think you might have it, but you don't know. I'm talking about before I literally did anything. This mountain you're trying to climb, before you even know you're a mountain climber." Aspiring filmmakers, take note.