John Singleton
Twenty years ago,
John Singleton became both the first African-American and the youngest person in history to earn an Academy Award nomination for Best Director. The filmmaker picked up the Oscar nod (as well as another for the screenplay) for his scintillating, powerful directorial debut "
Boyz n the Hood," all at the tender age of 24. Indeed, when the film premiered at
Cannes the previous year, the USC grad was only 23, and his South Central-set film remains an amazingly assured, thrilling and exciting piece of work to this day. And yet Singleton's never lived up to the promise suggested by it. Follow-up "
Poetic Justice" was something of a disappointment, but "
Higher Learning" was a minor bounce-back. And 1997 period drama "
Rosewood" remains the director's second best film, even if it tanked at the box office. But since then, it's been harder to get enthused about a new Singleton film, with the filmmaker becoming a sort of nameless action director-for-hire. Some of those films ("
Four Brothers") have a certain ludicrous pulpy charm. Some ("
Shaft," "
2 Fast 2 Furious") really don't. Only 2001's "
Baby Boy," a spiritual sequel to "Boyz n the Hood," suggested the Singleton of old was still going, and that was eleven years ago. Instead, we got a six-year gap after "Four Brothers," broken only by last year's "
Abduction," a truly dreadful
Taylor Lautner vehicle that would mark a career nadir for anyone who made it, let alone Singleton. It may be that Singleton, like many filmmakers with distinct storytelling voices, is finding it trickier to get more personal projects set up in the studio system. He was
in the running recently for biopics of both
N.W.A. and
Tupac, but lost out on both cases. But maybe it's time, as
Spike Lee did this year with "
Red Hook Summer," for Singleton to go back to his roots again for something lower-budget, rather than taking the next C-level action programmer that comes across his desk.
Mike Newell
Hardly a cinephile favorite, it's easy to forget the quality of some of
Mike Newell's work in the 1990s. Newell started off in the golden age of British TV drama, where acclaimed dramatists like
David Hare, David Edgar and
John Osborne would produce work for the long-since defunct "
Play For Today" slot. But he really started to turn heads in the mid-1980s with "
Dance With A Stranger," the
Miranda Richardson-starring biopic of Ruth Ellis, the last woman in Britain to be given the death penalty, which won him an award for best young director at
Cannes. Some solid work in the U.K. followed for the rest of the decade until "
Enchanted April" (one of
Harvey Weinstein's first successes with
Miramax) kicked off a pretty terrific run of work in the 1990s: charming family comedy "
Into The West," rom-com classic "
Four Weddings and a Funeral," the undervalued "
An Awfully Big Adventure," and, best of all, "
Donnie Brasco," in our view one of the best modern-day mob pictures. Newell showed a diversity, skill with actors and tonal assurance that boded well for what more was to come. Unfortunately, that didn't happen. "
Pushing Tin" felt like a minor misfire, and thought he helmed one of the better Harry Potter entries with '
Goblet Of Fire,' the work of the last decade has been pretty dismal. Treacly romance "
Mona Lisa Smile," the disastrous
Gabriel Garcia Marquez adaptation "
Love In the Time of Cholera," the half-assed blockbuster "
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time," and, this year, an uninspired, by-the-numbers take on
Dickens' "
Great Expectations" has seen the helmer on a run of middling to terrible pictures. Newell's seen as a safe pair of hands, but in the worst possible way; there's a complacency and a disinterest in his recent films, unrecognizable as from the man behind "Donnie Brasco." Maybe the upcoming Cold War peace summit film "
Reykjavik,"
with Michael Douglas as Ronald Reagan and
Christoph Waltz as Gorbachev, will turn things around, but we're not holding our breath.
Fernando Meirelles
All the directors on this list have made films we like, but perhaps only
John Singleton can claim to have made one of the best films of its respective decade.
Fernando Meirelles can make that claim too; his firecracker debut "
City of God" (co-directed with
Katia Lund) came out of nowhere, an astonishingly made favela-set crime tale of staggering scope and skill, weaning magnificent performances out of a young, mostly non-professional cast, and doing so with a vibrancy and filmmaking proficiency that suggested the arrival of a major director. And things were almost as promising with the director's follow-up, "
The Constant Gardener," a quieter, very different film, but one with many of the qualities of its predecessor, and featuring truly great performances from
Ralph Fiennes and
Rachel Weisz (who won an Oscar for her trouble). But Meirelles' success rate has plummeted with his two subsequent films. An adaptation of
Jose Saramago's "
Blindness," set in a world where the entire population start to lose their sight, was always going to be a tricky one to get right. But this time, Mereilles' style worked against him, making it hard to latch onto the film, not least because of an overly allegorical and grubby script. Still, the film's a masterpiece compared to follow-up "
360," an international spin on "
La Ronde" by "
Frost/Nixon" writer
Peter Morgan, which premiered on the festival circuit last year and swiftly imploded. It looked attractive at least, but a screenplay that alternated between being smug and pat and a throw-anything-at-the-wall-and-see-what-sticks visual approach added up to something of a disaster. Meirelles has since been
plotting a biopic of Aristotle Onassis, but it missed its mooted 2012 shooting date, so far at least. It doesn't immediately sound like the right tonic, though. We feel that Meirelles needs to hook up with a really top-flight screenwriter, or even reunite with Lund, in order to regain his mojo.
Thoughts? Surely, you must have some directors in mind who, maybe shouldn't fire their agent exactly, but perhaps should take a hard look at the projects they're taking on and asking themselves why the recent ones haven't worked. Yes, there are a million myriad factors at play when directing a film and lots can go wrong with even the best filmmakers in the world, but placing a closer eye on the material and hopefully not taking the gig just based on a paycheck (though, we get it, that's a reality for many freelancers), can hopefully ensure the final product is something everyone can at least be reasonably proud of.
20 Comments
Michael Scully | November 13, 2012 12:44 PM
It isn't "Hollywood" and it isn't the agents. Roger Donaldson, a man always forgotten when good directors are mentioned could turn coal in to a diamond. We are our own saviors. Stop talking about the motion picture business as if it were anything else than another field of battle where personal responsibility is the rule. If these men failed, they â¦.ed up. BTW, in the reverse, would someone mind telling me why the Iraq bomb defuser movie won anything? Also, the comments on Spielberg are true for the most part, except that Lincoln is rather good. Pompously yours, MJS
ali | November 10, 2012 11:22 AM
I agree about M. Night Shyamalan. He needs a serious career change.
Spielberg should stop directing and just produce.
Mitchell | November 9, 2012 1:45 PM
Stephen Frears, M. Night Shyamalan, Rob Reiner, Lawrence Kasdan, Alex Proyas, Andrew Niccol and I think most would disagree but I wasn't a fan of "The Grey", so Joe Carnahan.
james | November 9, 2012 8:43 AM
Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck... should fire his Hollywood agent. As should Gela Babluani, and all the other European directors who get sucked into the machine, and end up making a f*cking pudding that sinks their careers.
Aksel | November 9, 2012 6:44 AM
Spielberg.. Definetely Spielberg.. I'm still waiting to see an interesting movie from him.. His last good effort was Schindler's List.. Just because your name is Spielberg doesn't mean you can get a free pass for all the A.I's - War Horse's (ok, maybe "Catch me if you can" can be the exception)
Angela | November 9, 2012 1:39 AM
I agree with Spike Lee. I'd also add Jane Campion; personally, I thought The Piano was excellent, though it's definitely a movie that demands a particular taste, but since then, she really hasn't done a whole lont.
YUP | November 8, 2012 8:39 PM
Fernando Merielles and Dana Carvey, separated at birth?
George | November 8, 2012 7:17 PM
Shaft 2000 remake may be a linear action thriller. It sure gave us one of many great Jeffrey Wright performances. Also had Sam Jackson foul mouth mode. I wouldn't minded a sequel
Marko | November 8, 2012 4:18 PM
Just watch. One of these guys is going to wind up directing the new Star Wars film.
DJ | November 8, 2012 3:47 PM
Only reason Spike Lee isn't on here is because he continues to be prolific with his output; but that's his Catch-22: in his obsession to be 'culturally' relevant, his works have become tone deaf, uneven and in some cases, like Red Hook Summer, dreadful. But he still seems to tweet a lot to retain a good chunk of loyalty from fans, so maybe he's onto something.
And don't forget to add Kevin Smith, Hal Hartley, Jim Jarmusch (pick your decades old indie filmmaker) to the list.
Pedro | November 8, 2012 2:45 PM
This list ends up having really two certified talents, namely Mike Newell and Fernando Meirelles. Though "Blindness" had it's issues, it was a film that featured strong performances from Julianne Moore and Mark Rufallo (and it succeeded in building a very bleak portrait of humanity). Mike Newell's films though not achieving brilliance, have always been good showcases for the performers, even if sometimes they feel standard and uninspired ("Prince of Persia" being the more immediate case).
Rizzo | November 8, 2012 2:43 PM
I would go with Jim Sheridan who went from directing great tales like My Left Foot, The Boxer and In America, to making that 50 Cent biopic and Dream House. That should get anyone fired.
Francisco | November 8, 2012 2:36 PM
David Gordon Green.