Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

From Script To Screen: Your Guide To All The Deleted/Missing Scenes In 'The Master'

by Cory Everett
January 9, 2013 12:04 PM
  • |
Master S2S: Header

With the book now closed on 2012 films and awards season in full swing, we thought this would be a good opportunity to dive a little deeper into one of our favorite films of last year, Paul Thomas Anderson’s most recent opus, “The Master.” Though not your typical awards bait, the film has nonetheless managed to rack up an impressive number of accolades including the title of Best Film of 2012 by Sight & Sound, Rolling Stone and the Village Voice among others.

The production had a long (and well documented) road to the screen but we’ve yet to really dig into exactly how much the film changed from that rough draft we read back in 2010 to the version that landed in theaters this past September. The Weinstein Company recently posted the WGA nominated script on their FYC site and though it bears only a few noticeable differences from the earlier draft we reviewed back in 2010, it is significantly different from what ended up onscreen. Since “Punch-Drunk Love,” Anderson has become a more confident storyteller, allowing his films to evolve as he’s making them. Joaquin Phoenix described the process back in September saying, "Paul will write many, many scenes that won’t make it into the movie," adding that Anderson doesn't worry about continuity, is open to improvisation and often scenes that might take up one-eighth of a page can shoot for a day and a half.

Though many have noted how much of the footage from the teasers & trailers didn’t make it into the final film -- an intentional move by Anderson and editor Leslie Jones to give of the flavor of the film without actually spoiling it -- the screenplay also takes significant detours from the final film with entire deleted sequences, subplots and dialogue that radically alter the DNA of the piece. And while the film is ultimately a more compelling effort, it’s fascinating to compare the two versions. We would guess only about 60% of what’s on the page ended up onscreen so if you’re at all curious, the screenplay is definitely worth reading as a literary companion to the cinematic offering. While some moments in the screenplay now seem extraneous, by excising certain scenes Anderson has changed the nature of various relationships between the characters and obscured certain aspects of the story that were made clearer in the text as you’ll see below. Since we already highlighted many of the overt Scientology connections in our script review, we won't dwell on them here. Needless to say they are there if you're looking for them, many were scaled back for the final cut.

We’ve broken down the script into sections to note the film’s biggest deviations from the text and needless to say, there will be major spoilers so you should only read on after you’ve seen the film. Before we dig into the big changes, we thought would be worth pointing out that in the screenplay Freddie Sutton (not Quell) is described as being 28 years old (as opposed to the 38 year old Phoenix) and Peggy (Amy Adams) is called Mary Sue though we’ve referred to her here as Peggy to avoid confusion.

Master S2S: Gone To China
One of the most striking sections of the film is the opening 10 minutes featuring Freddie on the beach at the close of WWII, drinking his special brew out of a coconut, humping a sandwoman and explaining to his shipmates how to get rid of crabs. The first thing you'll notice when opening the screenplay is that absolutely none of this is in the script. Instead, the screenplay opens directly with Freddie being given a psychological exam by an army doctor in a scene similar (though not identical) to the one in the film.

After this, in the script, Freddie escapes from the hospital leaving a note that says “I’VE GONE TO CHINA. SEE YOU AGAIN SOMETIME. THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP.” This moment can be glimpsed in a deleted scene from the film and helped to thematically tie The Master’s choice of song at the end of the film, “(I'd Like To Get You On A) Slow Boat To China,” back to this moment. Subsequently Freddie visits a gambling club and gets mugged outside before we finally arrive with him at his job at the department store and the text matches back up with the film.

  • |

More: Paul Thomas Anderson, The Master

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    


  • ben | January 23, 2013 10:59 AMReply

    Does anyone know what the scene from the trailer with Freddie holding the gun is from?

  • reader | January 10, 2013 2:21 PMReply

    The article forgets to mention the wonderful monologue the Master delivers to Freddie in their final "break-up" scene. The one about sharing a past life during the Prussian war. Great, great stuff. IMHO, the script is far better than the film, which peters out right after the Window-to-the-Wall sequence. The third act could've used the suspense that the script had -- and the NYC stuff would've been a nice addition as well. It's too bad. I wanted to like the film, but I only liked about 2/3rds of it. And I saw it 3 times in the theater on 65mm.

  • rudy | January 9, 2013 9:56 PMReply

    I was bummed that Freddie did not say what I thought was the best line in the script which went something like: "This is booze, there are secrets in liquor".

    also I really loved the Cousin Bob sequence, as a New Yorker I was a bit bummed out that P.T Anderson didnt really get a chance to shoot in NY. I would of liked to have seen how he would of tackled making NYC look like 1951 and just the sheer bliss of finally seeing how Anderson and Mikai would of lensed it. I also loved that line Cousin Bob said: "I've been licking pussy all summer". It was to be shot in the Village and would have featured two girls that resemble Barbra Steisiand.

    - also I remember a great line in There Will Be Blood that had Daniel saying in the scene were he witnesses his fake brother's inebriated state with disgust, Daniel mentions something to effect of his cock being dead and rambles a bit about that and how H.W is not is biological son.

  • p-dub | January 10, 2013 12:02 PM

    1) The line about their being secrets in the booze is in the film.

    2) Are you referring to the script for There Will Be Blood because those lines certainly aren't in the film? In the sequence where he sees his "brother" getting drunk and asking for money, Daniel doesn't say a word. He just watches in the corner, dwelling in his anger.

  • Noany | January 9, 2013 1:39 PMReply

    hmmm. this isn't exactly related BUT: Has anyone noticed that in the soundtrack the bit of dialogue during the song sung by Madiesen Beaty that the male who speaks sounds kinda like Jeremy Renner??? He was the first choice for Freddie and worked before it fell off and then Phoenix came in... Can anyone else hear this?

  • Michael | January 9, 2013 1:31 PMReply

    Great article. Thanks for all the effort in putting this together.

  • yer | January 9, 2013 12:27 PMReply

    The final film is so much better. The script had a lot more cheesy genre elements at play like the Hardy boy chase for gold with his cousin and the paranoid chase after he retrieves the Master's box. Anderson made a great decision to not separate the The Master and Freddy for more than what was necessary as well as making Freddy not quit his alcoholism.

Email Updates