Review: 'Only God Forgives'
5 Doomed Romance Leonardo DiCaprio Movi ...
Wes Anderson's 5 Best Commercials
Can 'World War Z' Break Even?
Steve Soderbergh On Cinema, Studios, Mor ...
Recap: 'The King Of Comedy' 30th Anniversary ...
Excl: Lake Bell Joins 'Million Dollar Ar ...
10 Essential Cinematic Antiheroes"Margaret's" path to the big screen was famously tortured, with a prolonged editorial period that was punctuated by multiple lawsuits and several high profile filmmakers stepping in and trying to assist Lonergan in reaching his big screen goal (among them two filmmakers who are now dead: Sydney Pollack and Anthony Minghella, which is just one of many reminders of how long this thing took to get finished). The last director to try and shape "Margaret" was Martin Scorsese, who helped craft a version that was even longer than the one eventually released by Fox Searchlight last fall (we're not sure how closely that version resembles this home video release – let the speculation begin).
The film is a difficult one, for sure, with a kind of novelistic sprawl, but found a number of high profile champions around the time critics were putting out their annual top ten lists (including our own). This led to a mini-movement for critics and Academy voters to actually get copies of the film (Fox Searchlight wasn't sending out screeners), something identified, on Twitter at least, as being a part of Team Margaret. That might not have led to any Academy Award nominations but it did increase the film's profile, and in part led to several screenings at New York's Film Society of Lincoln Center, hosted by Lonergan.
Of course, since "Margaret" seems to carry with it an air of undesirability, the film will only be available through Amazon. Presumably this means that it won't be available through iTunes or Netflix, which is a real shame for a film that desperately deserves to be seen by more people. We were terrified it wouldn't even get a Blu-ray release, so we're excited and relieved about that, this extra half-hour-plus of footage is the cherry on top. What will this new version of "Margaret" hold? Extra Mark Ruffalo, perhaps? A considerably more focused third act? We'll have to wait and see on July 10th, when "Margaret" comes out on DVD and Blu-ray.
Why 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Suggests J.J. Abrams Needs To Leave His Mystery Box Alone For A While
8 Comments
Dingle | July 3, 2012 5:55 PM
Can't wait. I thought it was a flawed masterpiece. Best film for a long, long time. A real film. Not for the stupid, certainly.
Replicator | May 24, 2012 1:32 AM
This page contains information on dvd that is totally appreciative as well as correct. Thanks for sharing it. I often search such pages with best information.
http://www.summittechnology.com.au
Replicator | May 24, 2012 1:32 AM
This page contains information on dvd that is totally appreciative as well as correct. Thanks for sharing it. I often search such pages with best information.
Replicator
JD | May 15, 2012 4:22 PM
The (very long) script is even sloppier than the film, which leads me to believe this will simply be more of the same. I didn't miss anything from the script when I saw the film. In fact, I wish they'd cut more -- and I say that as a big fan of You Can Count on Me and Lonergan's plays.
Kevin | May 15, 2012 4:09 PM
I was not a fan of the theatrical version of "Margaret" -- you could tell it really needed room for the last act to work. Very excited to see what the 3+ hour version will do to the story and pace.
Mike | May 15, 2012 3:43 PM
It'll be interesting to see if this tightens things & makes it flow better, the theatrical cut had some extraordinary elements but felt like the premises for 3 or more films kind of shoehorned together, so it's still hard to imagine it'd be all pulled together with this. That said, Paquin gave probably the best performance by an actress I saw last year & Ruffalo was excellent as well in the pivotal but small role. Damon's role is rather awkward & he's wasted, double that for Matthew Broderick.