5 Doomed Romance Leonardo DiCaprio Movi ...
Wes Anderson's 5 Best Commercials
Can 'World War Z' Break Even?
Steve Soderbergh On Cinema, Studios, Mor ...
Recap: 'The King Of Comedy' 30th Anniversary ...
Excl: Lake Bell Joins 'Million Dollar Ar ...
10 Essential Cinematic Antiheroes"Oh yeah, I'm not doing it," he told MTV. "They're filming [the '300' sequel] right now. I wish them the best, but it didn't [work out]. It wasn't really my thing." No word on exactly what he didn't like about the new movie, but we guess his "thing" these days is appearing in inspirational third world dramas ("Machine Gun Preacher"), inspirational surfing movies ("Chasing Mavericks") and inspirational soccer dramedies ("Playing For Keeps"). Maybe this movie wasn't inspirational enough.
Anyway, it will soldier on without him (though we wonder if this means Headey won't be popping up either). Starring Sullivan Stapleton, Eva Green, Rodrigo Santoro, Callan Mulvey and Jack O'Connell, the exact plot details are being kept under wraps, but it seems it will go the side-quel route, with the narrative cutting in and out of the events of "300." But it seems the story can continue, whether or not Butler appears.
Noam Murro ("Smart People") is at the helm of this one, and whatever it turns out to be, we'll see the results on August 2, 2013.
Why 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Suggests J.J. Abrams Needs To Leave His Mystery Box Alone For A While
4 Comments
Alex | August 22, 2012 3:39 PM
Or maybe he just realized how cheesy the first movie was?
weetiger3 | August 22, 2012 2:41 PM
No, it's not a "complete shock". There was no way in hell he was going to put himself through the same grueling regimen to get into the same kind of physical shape (as he did for 300) for what would amount to a cameo.